Senin, 27 Mei 2013

The Art House: A New Column Dedicated to Movie Posters, Art and Design

EDITOR’S NOTE: I first became a fan of Brandon Schaefer’s work when I stumbled upon this brilliantly evocative poster for Jean-Pierre Melville’s “Le Samouraï.” I automatically bought a print – I don’t even remember making the decision, my fingers just *did* it, as naturally as checking email or dismissing a pop-up. It arrived on the most beautifully textured paper, I carelessly slapped it on the wall of my dorm room, and that was that. I was a fan. Brandon’s work has only grown more impressive in the years since. From Woody Allen to Ingmar Bergman (do yourself a favor and click those links), it seemed as if his lucid but unusually lush style could articulate the most beautiful part of any film, regardless of the shape that beauty took.

Naturally, I wasn’t the only person who noticed this, and Brandon is now regularly hired by the likes of IFC and Oscilloscope to distill their films into a single image. He’ll kill me for saying this, but he’s become one of the most talented in the modern world of movie posters, and he’s on his way to becoming one of the most prominent. His one-sheet for “Wings of Desire” is probably my favorite poster ever, and the framed 24 x 36 print I have in my room was the first thing my girlfriend and I agreed would come with us when we move in together this summer. From Fake Criterion covers to Mondo and everything in between, we’re living in a golden age of cinephile graphic design , and I’m incredibly proud and excited to have Brandon writing about the increasingly compelling world of movie art. And perhaps he’ll create a few new things for us along the way…

Without further ado, welcome to The Art House. – David Ehrlich

Screen Shot 2013-03-27 at 1.37.39 AM

You know how the first episode of a TV show often feels slightly divorced from everything that follows? This will probably be like that. Except instead of Jon Hamm, you get me, and instead of “Mad Men,” you get the premiere of a bi-weekly column focused on film art. Don’t worry, you could’ve done worse. There’s a good chance, though, that if you’re reading this, you might actually care about the latter. It’s only natural: the last few years have seen a resurgence of interest in art for film, firmly carried forward on the back of an ever-expanding collector’s market (thanks, Mondo!). More than a decade of overly photoshopped floating heads has finally given way to a seemingly endless loop of unofficial works striving to put right what once went wrong.

But, this isn’t about that. Or at least not yet. While a space dedicated to film art would be remiss in not looking at contemporary pieces or trends, I’m hoping that the 9-5 that keeps me from living on the streets or joining a thuggish and immaculately coordinated gang of ne’er-do-well graphic designers will offer a larger perspective. Something that manages to be both entertaining and educational. Kind of like an old episode of “Doctor Who,” except the only thing here as weak as cardboard is my sense of humor.

Which is probably as good of an introduction as I’m bound to write for myself.

I’m a working stiff. A graphic designer who, as the saying goes, is no more well known than your average electrician. These days, I spend the bulk of my time on film related work, with posters paying a large part of my bills. Now, this would be the point where another designer might start waxing nostalgic about their childhood, dovetailing into a lengthy story of how their love affair with movie posters was destined to blossom into the life changing career now before them. You know, the graphic designer equivalent of that kid who played with an 8mm camera and grew up to be J.J. Abrams. No such luck here. The only posters you could get anywhere near calling my favorite growing up were for ‘The Rocketeer’ and ‘The NeverEnding Story II’.

pilot_1

One was (and still is) an incredibly well crafted piece of design that manages to make a film about a guy in a rocket-pack look even more thrilling than its already exciting premise. The other is what you hang on your wall if you’re six, love sweatpants and worship a white flying dog. What I do remember making an impression were the things I’d never covet, much less hang. One-sheets for “Child’s Play” and “The Shining” were just a few of the posters that managed to be surprisingly effective, even if they weren’t the most intrinsically detailed pieces around.

pilot_2

When art critics argue over whether or not graphic design has the power to change lives, I’m the hypothetical case study dragged out in support of “duh.” Not only did living in constant fear of pictures on large pieces of paper allow me to fill my word count in a column more than a decade later (did I mention I was so scared that I used to sleep within arm’s reach of a proton pack and/or a lightsaber?), but it instilled a unique, if odd, appreciation for what design can be: a big club with spikes capable of being wielded (thanks, James).

And that’s the type of work that fuels my engine: design that aims to make you look; work that says something, communicates honestly an idea or a tone or, in the case of film, a hint at what’s to come.

pilot_3

It doesn’t necessarily have to be conventionally attractive to do that, either. The poster for “…and Justice for All” calls out the hypocrisy of it’s own title; “Taxi Driver” presents an isolated man within the bustling, gritty streets of New York; “Dancer in the Dark” hints at Selma’s failing eyesight and the grim future that awaits.

Creating work that checks all of those boxes is a tall order, one I’ve tried to get better at hitting for some time. When I started in high school, I’d often wind up frustrated, figuring there was an easy way out if I just focused on making something look cool instead. This is what “cool” looked like in 2000.

grinch_sch

First attempt at a movie poster. October, 2000

To be fair, that’s probably more than anyone could possibly hope for out of a sweatpants-loving kid with no formal training. Try and expand upon that years later with a little schooling and something more highbrow than Ron Howard’s “The Grinch” and you get an exercise in straining the phrase “too much of a good thing” to it’s breaking point.

I’ll be brief: my last semesters of college were spent designing posters for class based off of Tim Burton’s “Big Fish”. The assigned method of research meant breaking down the film from hours to seconds into an easily digestible infographic to get a feel for mapping out narrative, with the final poster leading into “The Five Obstructions”. Again, for brevity’s sake, this meant revisiting the finished poster five times in five different ways assigned by an outside party. That was my thesis, and while I can’t really explain what exactly I was thinking when I made these (although I must’ve had a copy of “Fear and Loathing” lying around at the time), I can say that this is what burnt out looked like in 2006.

pilot_7

pilot_6

pilot_8

Five different posters for “Big Fish”. 2005-2006

After a string of odd jobs involving delivering furniture and failed attempts at filmmaking, I sat down in 2008 and got myself into the habit of creating posters in my spare time for fake film screenings. There wasn’t much of a plan behind it: a steady job went out the door with a crumbling economy, and making something felt like a more worthwhile way of spending my free time than six-hour “Call of Duty” marathons. Plus, any would-be armchair design critics were bound to be a lot less hurtful than 12-year-olds calling you unspeakably horrible things over the internet for being unable to shoot straight.

pilot_9

pilot_10

Blade Runner and M, Friday Night Film Series, 2008. The Dark Knight, Feb 2009.

A lot of those early posters were fairly simple. Growing up in New England and reading Walden one too many times can do things to a person, I guess. Had growing a neckbeard been in the cards, maybe I’d have spent more time drawing likenesses instead of trying to be un-fussy with the ordinary, or the obvious. Who knows. But the posters clicked with some people: circumstance landed my work in front of the right eyes, giving me the opportunity to work on smaller re-releases. Years passed, doors opened on wider reaching projects, and I can now do a year’s worth of “Big Fish” work in under 3 days. (But I won’t. God, I won’t.)

pilot_12

pilot_11

Orpheus re-release poster, France, 2010. Lawrence of Arabia 50th Anniversary, Sony, 2012. Kes re-release poster, 2011.

Woody Allen sarcastically said that 80% of success was showing up, but he has a point: had there been a sizeable group of talented individuals scribbling away at their own alternate film posters then as there is now, I doubt I would’ve gotten the chance to make this into a career. The community was barely existent back then, and just “showing up” meant that at least someone was bound to take note, if only for the novelty of it all at the time. I got lucky, and have been fortunate enough to go from making my own posters for fun to steadily working on things that get more use than sitting in a special spot at the corner closet of my parents house.

I can’t say whether or not any of this work has the blunt, impactful nature of a big, spiked club – that’s not my call to make. But the process of getting it put together should’ve birthed enough insight about design, history, and everything else in between for me to try and make this column a worthwhile read for the foreseeable future. Assuming anyone still knows how to read. I don’t. Why else make pictures for a living?

See more of Brandon’s work on his website.

Categories: Columns

Tags: Big Fish, Brandon schaefer, Kes, Movie posters, SeekandSpeak, The Art House, The dark knight

Minggu, 26 Mei 2013

Director’s Cut: Derek Cianfrance Talks ‘The Place Beyond the Pines’

Although he’s best known for directing the deeply dark and remarkably affecting “Blue Valentine,” director and screenwriter Derek Cianfrance got his start in the cinematic world through making documentaries about a variety of subjects. Whether it was catching up with degenerates or exploring the dark underbelly of society, he found plenty of stories worth telling in a more traditional form, including this month’s three-part drama, “The Place Beyond the Pines” which re-teams Cianfrance with his “Blue Valentine” star, Ryan Gosling. We recently caught up with Cianfrance to discuss filmmaking, the importance of the film “Creepshow” and the deeply rooted shame of Ryan Gosling.

Amanda Mae Meyncke: “The Place Beyond the Pines” seems at times like it’ll be heist movie, but then it’s three separate stories that get equal weight — it’s kind of an anthology. Horror movies are doing that a lot these days. Is that the future of film, all shorter stories tied together?

Derek Cianfrance: For 20 years I wanted to make a triptych, ever since I saw Abel Gance’s “Napoleon” in film school. When I saw that ending with the three screens going on at one time I wanted to make a movie that was three, and you know, “Blue Valentine” was a duet, so the next logical step was to make a triptych. The horror movie thing, the vignettes stories, you know “Creepshow?” I watched “Creepshow” more than any other movie in my life. So maybe “Creepshow” sunk itself into this movie somehow. I was interested in the one, the singularity of this movie, even though it is three different movies, I was interested in the consistency of making a single story out of those stories, how it would all unify into one. The one thing that was really crucial to me in this was the structure, and keeping it linear. There was lots of suggestions in the process of making this film, you know, putting it in a blender. And I’d seen [Alejandro González] Iñárritu do that, I’d seen [Quentin] Tarantino do that, all the way back to D.W. Griffith through “Star Wars,” has done the crosscut. I did it myself in “Blue Valentine,” but for this film, it was about lineage, it was about being haunted by your past, it was about legacy. I felt like it had to go in linear order. I don’t know what the future holds but I’m very excited that it is a fresh movie that audiences have the choice to go see something that isn’t simple a genre film or a heist film.

agenda-cine-films-2013-L-pf_wH2

AMM: One of the major themes is a deep disappointment and how it can affect what happens next in a person’s life, the sins of the fathers being passed down. The fathers and sons in this movie have strange relationships, and Bradley Cooper’s character is on both sides of that.

DC: To be a parent, you can understand it more. I interviewed a number of police officers and soldiers who had taken lives in the line of duty and who had an incredible difficulty ever relating to their home life again afterwards, the divorce rate amongst cops is huge. Avery’s a guy who grows up in this hierarchy in the city, he’s kind of royalty in this city, his father’s this powerful judge and he’s expected to assume that place that his father has set aside for him, but he wants to be his own man so what does he do? he becomes a cop, he’s never supposed to be a cop, he’s not really good at it. He has this one moment where he acts too eagerly, too full of ambition to become the hero cop, what does he do? He makes this mistake. I think he regrets it, the guy has a child, and Avery has a child, and you start thinking well, it’s not fair. It’s guilt, it’s a toxic shame that takes over him and he feels corrupted inside and he can’t deal with himself anymore, so what does he do? He deals with the corruption all around him instead of the corruption inside of him. I think it’s a very human thing, it’s part of the human condition if you’ve ever killed somebody. [pause] Which I haven’t. But my research shows.

AMM: This was your second time working with Ryan Gosling, He’s obviously a huge draw, he’s very popular right now. You de-pretty-fied him in this film, with the tattoos and the bleached hair. Took him out of his element, was he involved in the creation of this character?

DC: He is the guy. He becomes the guy. He called me up one day about six months before we started shooting, and he said “Hey D, let’s do the most tattoos in movie history.” I was like, “You wanna put tattoos on in this movie, huh?” And he says, “Yeah, I want a face tattoo.” And I said, “C’mon man, a face tattoo? That’s really extreme.”

AMM: “I’m trying to sell a movie here!”

DC: No, it’s just a lot to walk around with a face tattoo, and he said “No, face tattoos are the coolest, and this one’s gonna be a dagger and it’s gonna be dripping blood.” And I said “Okay if I was your parent right now, I’d tell you don’t get a tattoo, you’re gonna regret it, but you’re a big boy, you’re the guy, if you want a tattoo, get a tattoo.” Ao he got a tattoo for it. So we’re shooting the movie, first day of production and he comes up to me during lunch and he says “Hey D, can I talk to you for a second?” And then he said, “I think I went too far with the tattoo,” and I said “Well, that’s what happens when you get a tattoo, you regret it, and now you have to live with it. You’re not taking it off, it’s on you, every time you walk into a scene, it’s gonna be the first thing people see and it’s with you, you’re marked.” He was ashamed of it, and that shame played into his character, so when he’s holding the baby for the first time, he’s a marked man, he’s tarnished, he’s tainted, he’s stained, and here’s this baby that’s clean and he doesn’t feel good enough to hold it.

You know the scene when he walks into the baptism? He was never supposed to cry in that scene, Ryan walked in and there was Eva [Mendes] and the baby, and the whole City of Schenectady dressed nicely, and here comes Ryan, walking in with ripped t-shirt, just covered in tattoos and he sits down in a corner, and we’re shooting him, I noticed he was just trembling, just absolutely ashamed, in fear, regretful, and he started crying. I wanted to stop the cameras and give the guy a hug, but you couldn’t and that’s what I’m looking for when I’m making my films, I’m looking for when the acting stops and when the behavior begins. When actors make decisions like that… I”m so thankful that Ryan went as far as he did, cause it created who that guy was.

AMM: The title is intriguing, a very mysterious “Twin Peaks”-y title, it’s the indian name for the city of Schenectady, but I didn’t know that going in. I kept looking for the literal place beyond the pines, and there’s a few pivotal moments where events happen, life altering events are begun deep in the forest.

DC: I feel very close to that feeling of dread in my life, a lot of times I’m a very big worrier, if I didn’t have filmmaking to take my imagination away, my life would be a wreak. The place beyond the pines is imaginary. Yes, it is about Schenectady, but to me, it’s the place where [certain characters] get to at the end of the movie.

AMM: Do you see writing and directing as a way of working out issues in your own life? 

DC: Yes. [Long pause, smile.]

AMM: [laughs] Good answer!

DC: [smiles] There’s no elaboration on that.

AMM: You came from a strong documentary background, did that come into play with this film? With “Blue Velvet” it’s a little easier to see…

DC: “Blue Valentine.”

AMM: “Blue Valentine!” Sorry!

DC: When an actor does the script, I’m disappointed. I wanna be surprised, I want to find life. I want to capture life in living, breathing moments, so we never go in and do the script. I never say action, I never say cut, the actors do all the research, for instance, documentary background will go into place when Ryan walks in with all these tattoos, we’ve set up this whole situation, now he walks up, everyone in the church is either looking at him or ignoring him and he’s sitting in the back corner of the church and he’s trapped and he’s on camera and all he wants to do is run away but he has to stay there and that process of filmmaking creates that. There’s another moment where there’s like a four page dialogue scene after they rob their first bank, and Ben and Ryan are counting money, and the lines were something like, Ben says, “Well it’s not a million dollars yet, but if we do it a few more times it will be.” So we’re setting up to shoot that shot, and Ryan played “Dancing in the Dark” on the radio, just to get the mood going, and we got this beautiful moment with Ben with his shirt off, and Ryan with the dog, and cigarette smoke, and Bruce Springsteen, and I never thought Bruce Springsteen would be in the movie, and then all of a sudden, we did four hours of the rest of the dialogue, but that moment was the thing that felt alive. I’m always looking for life.

AMM: Directing puts you in close contact with your own limitations as an artist, did you find that to be true in making this film?

DC: My film professors always told me that as an artist, you must risk failure. I’ve tried to do that my whole life, tried to push to the point where I will fail. In making documentaries many years ago, I interviewed Danica Patrick, and I asked her “How do you drive so fast?” and she said “Well, ever since I was a little girl, I’d always know how fast I could go, I’d always drive as fast as I could, and I’d always push it a couple notches forward. I’d get to the point where I was really in danger of crashing, and that’s how I could continue to go fast.” So, to me, as a filmmaker, “Pines” played right above the speed I could go and I pushed up to that speed, that’s how you evolve. Especially about this film that’s about Darwinism, it’s about evolution, it’s about growth, personal growth. I had to do that.

Categories: Interviews

Tags: Blue valentine, Derek Cianfrance, Director's cut, Ryan gosling, The Place Beyond The Pines

Jumat, 24 Mei 2013

Exclusive Trailer: ‘Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters’

Film.com and MTV are happy to give you an exclusive look at the first trailer for “Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters” and boy, do these kids want this blanket something fierce.

In the sequel to 2010's “Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief,”  Percy (Logan Lerman) and all his demigod friends are back. After rescuing Zeus’ all-powerful lightning bolt in the series’ first installment, Percy and Co. (including Brandon T. Jackson, Alexandra Daddario, Douglas Smith and more, including “The Host”‘s Jake Abel as scowly demigod Luke) must recover a golden fleece, which will save their home, Camp Half-Blood, from the Bad Guys (and, one assumes, the shivers).

Check out the trailer, above, for all kinds of cool effects (fire! Swords! Intrigue! Adventure!), friendly teen competition (looks like Leven Rambin, as Clarisse La Rue, gives our favorite wallflower demigod a run for his money) and, of course, a desperate search for fleece.

“Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters” is set for release on August 16, 2013.

Categories: Trailers

Tags: Exclusive, Percy Jackson and the Sea of Monsters, Trailer

Kamis, 23 Mei 2013

Review: ‘The Brass Teapot’

The-Brass-Teapot-Prev

“Ughhhhhhh, why did we drink so much?” “Because it was free!”

So moans the adorable Gen Y couple living in a tiny (no, cozy!) rented house in a lovely Indiana town, where butterflies escort you on your bike ride to work. That is, if you are lucky enough to have work. “The Brass Teapot” introduces us to Alice (Juno Temple) can’t land a gig despite her springy interview outfits, and is saddled with university debt. John (Michael Angarano) is about to lose his telemarketing gig because he can’t force himself to smile while on the phone with a potential mark. To make matters worse, Alice’s old high school chum (“Gilmore Girl” Alexis Bledel) is rolling in the dough – not that Alice and John are the jealous type, but it’s just all so frustrating.

Alice and John are clearly good people in life and good people in love. They laugh, playfully conspire against square relatives, don’t hassle one another and are sex-positive. It would all be perfect if there was, you know, money to buy the food required to remain people, at all.

Due to circumstances that remain a bit murky throughout the remainder of the film (I smell scenes removed from the final cut) Alice comes in contact with an ancient brass teapot. With an indelible surface and a star of David, the wee objet d’art will “imprint” upon you and then spout $100 bills when you injure yourself. Let the masochistic comedy begin.

An energetically filmed series of truly entertaining sequences commences, and Ramaa Mosley’s debut feature quickly becomes a montage of cringe-comedy bits in which John and Alice singe and scrape one another to make the Benjamins. One involves a leather belt in the bedroom and I can safely say it is the cheeriest-yet-still-erotic lovemaking scene to hit screens in quite some time. Despite John and Alice truly “deserving” this good fortune, I don’t have to tell you that stories, particularly those rooted in fable and myth, have a way reminding us to be careful what we wish for.

As our heroes’ wealth increases, so does their greed and so does the danger. Two rather belligerent Hasidic Jews are on the trail of the teapot (creepily evoking the semiotics of a Jewish conspiracy of unearned wealth, but whatever) as well as a wise and heavily accented Chinese man foretelling doom for those that think they can outsmart the treacherous gewgaw.

As for the teapot itself, it starts to build a tolerance. Its payments decrease, and soon demand that John and Alice feast off the pain of others (bad, once they start clipping hobos with the car) as well as one another’s mental anguish (so here come the small penis size remarks.)

These scenes remain funny solely based on Temple and Angarano’s warm performances, which exude a refreshing unwillingness to be prude. Temple is sunny and lovable without falling into Deschanel traps, and her arc toward avarice is comical without being cartoonish. She’s a petite figure with a bold voice; her defiant shouts rooted in goldlust kill. I’m sure I won’t be the only one to compare Angarano to Sam Rockwell (indeed, didn’t Rockwell play the fictionalized version of Angarano in the ill-advised “Gentlemen Broncos?”) but this can only be meant as a compliment.

What doesn’t work is how the screenplay’s would-be traditional story beats leap frog one another. When you think you’ve reached the “dark moment,” things start to hum along again until our pair are reminded of their hubris. I don’t think this is a clever way of shaking up narrative forms, I think it is a case of lots of ideas from a script’s first draft evading excision during the rewrite stage. Also, why why why would John take the teapot onto “Antiques Roadshow?” There had to have been a less absurd way to get the word out.

Despite the numerous patchy moments “The Brass Teapot” by and large squeaks by as an enjoyable entertainment. Between the numerous scenes of Juno Temple in sleepwear, off-screen sound effects of someone “earning” their wages, a discussion if “Lord of the Rings” is literature and the presence of Alia Shawkat in a small role, there emerges a film too agreeable to fully dismiss.

SCORE: 6.0 / 10

Categories: Reviews

Tags: Alexis bledel, Alia Shawkat, Juno temple, Michael angarano, Review, The Brass Teapot

Selasa, 21 Mei 2013

Director’s Cut: Shane Carruth (‘Upstream Color’)

Upstream-Color-Still1-AmySeimetz-ShaneCarruth

Much like a Shane Carruth film, there are different ways to approach a Shane Carruth interview.

Do you focus on the technical aspects of this remarkable polymath? For 2004's time-traveling “Primer” he is credited as writer, director, producer, star, composer, production designer, casting director and editor. For “Upstream Color,” his newest emotional tour-de-force about free will, manipulation and the drive to find the source of the unexplainable, he is the writer, director, star, co-producer, composer, cinematographer, co-camera operator, co-editor and sound designer. Oh yeah, he’s the film’s distributor, too.

Or do you focus on Carruth’s stature in the independent film world? After 2004 he seemed like the Sundance equivalent of Harper Lee – a “one and done” filmmaker content to recede into legend.

Perhaps you focus on the nitty gritty of his stories? The quantum mechanics aspect of his films, replete with unanswered questions due to his intentionally elliptical style?

Despite my intentions to break the conversation into these three delineated acts I ended up on an unpredictable path in need of its own Wikipedia flowchart. Carruth’s demeanor is very warm, and open to just the sort of “heavy” conversation you may not have had since your college dorm. Despite a near-pointillist style of filmmaking, he speaks in stammers, half-phrases and questions to himself. (I left a few in where I thought they felt most poetic.) Considering Carruth has made one of the most vibrant and sharp pictures in quite some time (here is my review at ScreenCrush, here is Film.com’s review by Will Goss) I’m of the belief that he is a soaring genius who, for the sake of economics, lowered himself to spend time responding to my questions.

With that, then, here is the bulk of a conversation held unceremoniously in the hallway of a cozy Lower Manhattan publicist’s office. You’ll see that I open with a typically professional and unbiased salvo.

Jordan Hoffman: For selfish reasons, I thank you for making this movie. It’s refreshing to discuss a movie and not necessarily know the answer. I’ve been in two bar fights about it already – not fisticuffs, of course.

Shane Carruth: Sure.

JH: Conversations. I have one friend who can’t stand the film. I’m sure you can handle that.

SC: Understood, yeah.

JH: We got in a nice tussle and it’s exciting.

SC: It’s great to hear.

JH: There are some people who get hung up on the “what the hell is this” and need some handholding with the very plot. We saw this at the Sundance Q&A. Your movie is, for lack of a better term, a little weird, but, my gosh, you show the worm go out of the lady and into the pig … what more can you show?!?

SC: Exactly.

JH: Is it frustrating? Were you expecting that?

SC: I was expecting that. Whatever frustration I would have with that is a known quantity, going back to the writing. That’s just part of it. It necessarily has to be divisive because it is trying something new. Whether it is “good” or “bad” at doing what it is trying to do – at fulfilling its intentions – that’s almost not part of this because the intention is new. Or, hopefully new. Whatever. The ambition is not typical, let’s say. Because of that there will be people who come to it immediately, and they’ll judge it that way, or there will be people whose expectations haven’t been lined up properly, if I haven’t prepared them.

From the get go, it won’t give those people what they’re expecting. I’m somewhat amazed – well, not amazed – happy that the response has been as positive.

JH: You expected more people to say “Worm-pigs? I’m not buying it!”

SC: More or less.

JH: Or more people put off by the structure? The third act being almost entirely dialogue-free.

SC: Yeah, the number one thing I was worried about was, in the same way that “Primer” – and this is not a complaint at all, because I’m lucky anyone wants to watch that movie – but in the same way that “Primer” is sometimes reduced to being only a puzzle. It’s a puzzle to solve without anything underneath it, to some. And I was worried that this would become that – that people would only see the mechanical, or the weird genre elements.

JH: There is the fear of the gimmick aspect. Not that gimmick is always a bad thing, but, you know, you go to this guy’s movies to go “huh?”

SC: Yep.

JH: The most subversive thing David Lynch ever did was making “The Straight Story.” Great title, because it’s about a guy named Alvin Straight traveling in a straight line – but it is also a straightforward film from a man you never expected to make one. Do you see yourself ever wanting to “go straight” as it were?

SC: If I did, it wouldn’t be to subvert other things I’ve done. I do my best to never, ever think about a body of work or a career. This film is not a reaction to the last one. It’s the story in front of me now and I need to serve that.

JH: Well, despite the fact that we’ve never met and I don’t know much about you personally, that hasn’t stopped me from trying to psychoanalyze you.

I know you did work on a lengthy screenplay called “A Topiary,” you worked on it for years, did a lot of the design work, and you’ve commented that the movie is done in your head but you are the only one who can see it. “Upstream Color” is, at least in my opinion, all about breaking out of a cycle that is perpetuated by outside forces. So, is this your way of fighting the forces that prevented that film from happening?

SC: Huh. I never thought of that. Well. [long pause. and then quickly] I mean, who knows? It probably was informed by that. Maybe. It didn’t feel like that, I thought it was just a universal thing of. . .the way we build up our own narratives and identity and ways of thinking about everything. Whether religious or cosmic or whatever – that was the narrative that she [Amy Seimetz' character] was meant to be stuck in, then letting her grow a new one and letting her live that out, that was always the core of the idea. But. . .yeah. . . being affected by offscreen forces, the two ideas seem intertwined to me. That’s what I think personal identity is.

JH: Are you familiar with the author and neuroscientist Sam Harris?

SC: No.

JH: He recently wrote a book called “Free Will,” which, if my understanding is correct, argues that man does not have free will, but not because of any theological reasons. He looks at chemical reactions in the brain, the synapses either fire or don’t fire, and the result of all this is a chemical reaction, therefore humans may not be responsible for their actions, it is all chemical, all a result of environment, etc.

SC: Yes. Okay, I was just talking about this. This is, see, this is – not that, not that, not that – wow – what’s interesting about that, with non-linear dynamics and a swath of math you can start from order to chaos. You can get to unpredictably. So if that is true – even if we are the sum of physical neurons, something that can be reduced to math, even that math may not necessarily be predictable. You can make a case that there is a way for the math to work so that nobody but a God or a quantum computer could ever predict.

JH: A ghost in the machine, even in the numbers themselves.

SC: Yes, there we go.

JH: Some look at the first third of the “Upstream Color,” the most tactile part, and you can reduce it to a science fiction or horror story if you want. “The worms go in, they go in the pig, etc.” But it’s not that far out! Do you know about toxo –

SC: Toxoplasmosis, yes. I know about it, but from interviews. Though I definitely read a little about it. There’s a lot of things I realize that I accumulated in my head. I wasn’t trying to use them as plot devices, but I know they informed me – just knowing that there can be a process in the natural world, just outside our experience, that is counterintuitive in some way. Like the parasites who burrow in wasps and ants.

JH: There are many examples. The best one is the cat and mouse one because it conjures “Tom and Jerry” cartoons. The parasite that breeds and wants to return to the intestines of a cat, but is excreted and picked up and inside a mouse, which is able to tell mice not to be afraid of cat urine, the thing mice are most afraid of, so the mouse is now hanging out in the kitchen and is just “hey, what’s up, cat?” and now the cat eats him.

SC: Yes. And to the mouse, he’s, I don’t imagine he’s. . .hmnnn. . .

JH: There’s probably a pleasure center being stroked. He’s probably the happiest mouse in town. He’s fulfilling his goal, right?

SC: Right. Well – heh, I can’t believe we’re talking about this, this is fun stuff – but I would think that that mouse, in the same way we would, he would feel that he is being affected from a distance. I think, anyway. 95% of him is telling him “danger, danger!” yet 5% of him is compelling him to do this thing. He would have to be conflicted. That’s why I go to this outside force.

Screen-Shot-2012-12-07-at-11.26.43-PM

JH: I have a friend who reads “Upstream Color” as a story about drug addiction. How do you react when people come to you with interpretations that seem viable but you may be thinking “well, hell, I was somewhere else.”

SC: That’s part of it. Viewing work, now, is a communal experience. Any film that exists that is thorough, you can’t give it to an audience of one and have that be effective communication. Communication involves an audience of many that have a conversation, put it through the ringer, filter it and then a sense of it coalesces. So if I am an author, my success is that end result.

JH: But you are the author with a capital A on this one. You are director, writer, cinematographer, star, composer, co-editor, etc. Film is a collaborative process, but on your films a little less so.

SC: Film is a collaborative process, absolutely, but I am a control freak. I need to make sure that all the ways that we can inform are pointed in the same direction.

JH: I read you don’t play any instruments, but music is so important in this film. If I may ask a basic question, how the heck to do you compose the score?

SC: Some of it is hunting and pecking. I have a MIDI keyboard, which I couldn’t, like, play you a song on, but. . .

JH: Could you find Middle C?

SC: I can. I know my chords, I know where I live, I know my neighborhoods. But I couldn’t perform for you.

JH: I hand you sheet music for J.S. Bach and it’s no way.

SC: When I was a kid I took piano lessons for a month or two and she would have me do my scales. When I went home I learned Scott Joplin’s “The Entertainer.” And I taught it to myself, and I was so proud that it was something I could play. I remember coming into class and I played it for her, and I was expecting praise – but she was unhappy. My technique was wrong. I wasn’t raising my wrists the right way. She said that I shouldn’t go learn a piece of music “wrong” because I would have bad habits. She was right, but it felt like, “hey, I was really liking that.”

JH: You reached the ends but you did it by your own means and The Man came and cracked down on you. It’s like self-distributing your own film, you aren’t allowed to do that.

SC: This is perfect. Patterns everywhere.

JH: Let me ask you a bold question, Shane, and this is the question that everyone asks behind your back but no one has the guts to ask. But I do.

SC: All right.

JH: You make “Primer” in Two-thousand and blah-blah-blah. You work hard on “A Topiary,” I don’t know if you are doing it with some sort of studio deal in place.

SC: Hey, this is the question people ask. “How were you living?”

JH: Well, people are nosy. Were you approached to do studio work? Or commercials? Or music videos? Have you done any of that?

SC: I haven’t done any of that.

JH: Approached to act in any films?

SC: No.

JH: But you act in both your films and you’re a handsome boy. You could probably get acting work.

SC: Oh, well. . .thank . . .well, I don’t even know if that’s true. No. No one’s ever – well, actually, that’s not true. . .

JH: Approached by other indie filmmakers looking to include you for some cred, maybe?

SC: Uh. Sometimes. . .yeah. . .and then there’s. . .look. . .here’s the thing. I don’t live in a world where things get offered to me. But you know, I don’t know anybody who does. And I know famous and well-to-do filmmakers and they don’t just get an email saying “hey, here’s an offer.” You have to put yourself out there to get the offer and that is a conversation that I didn’t really want to have.

JH: I would imagine Chrysler would want you to do an ad if you told them you were game.

SC: Sure. Why not? Well, they’d be worried that it would come back and there wouldn’t be a car in it.

JH: Hey, at the end of the day, you didn’t sell out. Good for you. Whether you stayed fed by living on a commune. . .

SC: More or less, I actually have. I don’t have a family to support. If I did, some other choice would have to’ve been made.

JH: If digital video existed when “Primer” was made, how different would it be? The story, not so much the aesthetics.

SC: The story would not be different. The rough edges would be less rough.

JH: I’m wondering if you would have scenes in there that you didn’t have because of budget or time – scenes like the girlfriend’s father offscreen, would you want to include them?

SC: No, those choices were made. It wasn’t “let’s not shoot that because film is expensive” or “we don’t have enough film.”

JH: Your writing process: you have the themes and then they become manifested in concrete ideas. What sort of self-censorship do you have? When you are playing with the idea and “well, it’s a pig” there’s got to be something of an internal dialogue. What’s that like?

SC: It’s tough. It’s one that continues to hit you. There were a few times when I had the camera and we were doing the pig surgery and I’m thinking “what are they letting me do? This is nuts!” And this is meant to be an emotional story but right now this is the weirdest thing imaginable. The only thing I can ever do is make a film that I can respond to. I could not make a romantic comedy for college girls. I wouldn’t know how that works. This is an aesthetic that I’m comfortable with.

JH: Are you the type of guy who gorges on films? On Blu-rays? Going to festivals?

SC: No. I used to be.

JH: Did that change when you started making films?

SC: No. A couple of years ago. It’s just decreased. I’m far less likely to hunt around. For me personally, it hasn’t been satisfying. I’ll watch every movie P.T. Anderson ever makes religiously, but I’m not in the game of hunting anymore. Of course, I say that and now I’ll probably get back into hunting some more.

JH: Is there something you would want people to see to “prepare,” in a way, for “Upstream Color?”

SC: I have never thought of this. [whispering to himself] What is this? [long pause] What is this? To prepare, or to find a similar ambition…? There’s gotta’ be something.

JH: Perhaps a non-narrative or experimental film?

SC: No, not at all. That’s the thing.

JH: Some B-movie sci-fi? For thought-control worms? I don’t really see you as a B-movie or “Mystery Science Theater” guy.

SC: No. Well, I enjoy those things. [on the question] I can’t get to this. I’m sorry.

JH: Some movies they say “you gotta see it more than once.” I saw “Upstream Color” twice and there was nothing in it plot-wise that I “got” more the second time. A few very minor things I caught.

SC: What was it?

JH: Somehow I spaced out on how they got the CDs of the sound effects. I think I just didn’t see the name on the mailbox.

SC: Oh, okay. Right.

JH: Hey, that one was on me, I just didn’t look, then when I saw it the second time it was right in my face. Do you want people to see it more than once?

SC: Yes. But I want them to want it.

JH: Not a chore.

SC: The experience you had is the experience I’m hoping for. I want the meaning to be veiled in some way, but I want there to be an emotional experience that happens in one viewing that is satisfying, and for the narrative to be satisfying. As far as the meaning, I’m hoping that it is thrifty enough and compelling enough and lyrical and musical enough that it isn’t a horrifying concept to revisit. My hope is that it’s another captive audience to engage with the exploration.

If I watch a story and I’m challenged by it – like “The Master” – if I’m challenged by the way it works I spend more time thinking about it. Why does it work? What’s happening? Why is that phone being delivered in the middle of the theater? There are naked dancers?

JH: Hey, listen man, we’re out of time, but those are the questions I have for you. I “get” this movie, but I can’t quite figure out the rocks in the pool. I have a vague sense, but I don’t know that I’ll ever really know them unless I hold a gun to your head.

SC: I’ll tell you.

JH: Do you want me to turn this recorder off?

SC: Yeah, turn it off and I’ll tell you. First you tell me what you think.

What followed was me giving Shane a halfway-there interpretation, then his definitive, concrete answer. After my, “oh, no shit!” response I commenced to pummel him with other little questions (was the early shot of her in the pool a flashforward? did the Thief and the Sampler and the Gardeners know one another?) until I was pulled out of the room.

“Upstream Color” starts its theatrical run on April 5th, followed by VOD and Blu-ray, then a life on the shelf of every true cineaste in the world.

Categories: Interviews

Tags: Director's cut, Interview, Jordan hoffman, Primer, Shane Carruth, The master, Upstream Color, Worms

Senin, 20 Mei 2013

‘Room 237′ and Four Other Films With Hidden Meanings

One of the many pleasures of watching movies is finding that gem you can’t get out of your head, which then inevitably leads to multiple viewings over the span of years to the point where you being to find meanings that may or may not have been intended by the filmmakers.

Few in the movie biz have inspired more obsessive viewing than Stanley Kubrick. “2001: A Space Odyssey,” ”A Clockwork Orange,” yes, even “Eyes Wide Shut” warrant multiple viewings and for many Kubrick fans the more layers you peel away the more hidden meanings you stumble upon—all of which are both completely legitimate and a litte bit nuts. (Contributing to this is the fact that Kubrick rarely went into great detail about his work in the few interviews he gave, effectively fueling the fire of crazed obsession .)

But out of the Kubrick filmography, the one film that seems to inspire the most (and most deranged) theories of meanings and subliminal messages is “The Shining.” This week sees the release of Rodney Asher’s “Room 237,” a documentary that highlights some of the most passionate of these “alternate” interpretations, the title referring to the room Dick Hallorann tells young Danny never to enter.

A visual essay of sorts, the film is almost entirely comprised of clips from “The Shining” with voiceovers done by the theorists explaining in great detail what they believe the film is about—ranging from the slaughter of the Native Americans to Kubrick’s admission that the Apollo 11 moon landing was a hoax and he was the one behind it.

But Kubrick films are hardly the only ones with “hidden meanings.” Here’s a few we came across that make us think about the movies a little deeper (and in some cases just scratch our heads).

Have you found a hidden meaning in a film? Put it in our comments section.

“2012? (Roland Emmerich)

dashiz

Known for his talents to create CGI-heavy doom and gloom films (which earned him the nickname “The Master of Disaster”), Roland Emmerich’s most recent catastrophe-focused blockbuster “2012,” which plays off the legendary Mayan calendar’s prediction of the end of the world, caused some to look into the incidents shown in the film as a premonition of an overthrown by the powers that be. On YouTube, The Vigilant Christian spends over a half hour breaking down the subliminal messages he found in the film, including the catastrophic images portrayed as a soon-to-be end to Christianity and the survivors being the dawn of a new world order.

“Donnie Darko” (Richard Kelley)

547031_3877860740865_163562339_n

Richard Kelly’s debut feature become an overnight cult phenomenon as its thrilling story about a teen (Jake Gyllenhaal) who has apocalyptic visions (and is tormented by a deranged bunny-man) caught on quick with younger audiences. One fan was so enamored by the film he began digging for Kelly’s inspirations and found the manuscript, The Philosophy of Time Travel, which he believes outlines the weird occurrences throughout the film. The fan insists that the film’s protagonist is not a strange teen with weird visions, but actually a martyr.

“…the movie accounts a natural phenomenon, a wormhole and the formation of a parallel universe, through the eyes of the most significantly affected human figure involved, Donnie Darko. By virtue of some sort of cosmic law, Donnie is set into motion on a path to restore the extremely fragic, turbulent Tangent Universe back to the normal Primary Universe… Through the eyes of (an assumed) schizophrenic, we can never really know for sure what Donnie experienced during those 28 days. What we know with confidence is that during his tenure as the Living Receiver, Donnie finally overcame his fears of death and loneliness…”

“Mulholland Drive” (David Lynch)

mulholland_drive_movie-207802

David Lynch has made a career creating highly interpretive films, and Mulholland Drive may be his magnum opus. Starring Naomi Watts as a perky aspiring actress who comes across a woman (Laura Harring) who has lost her memory, the two hunt throughout L.A. for clues to her identity. Alan Shaw‘s exhaustive look at the film has him believe that the film is Lynch’s homage to young wannabe starlets who travel to the bright lights of Hollywood only to have their dreams crushed.

“…it is important to view this film as an ode to those young women whose lives are destroyed during their pursuit of a Hollywood career. In fact, the film is explicitly dedicated to one such woman named Jennifer Syme, who had previously worked with David Lynch on some of his films. She was 29 when she was killed in a tragic car accident the same year the movie came out. Interestingly enough, I believe that the film is covertly dedicated to another young woman who also aspired to make it in Hollywood. That young woman died at the age of 22, at about a week from the day one year after David Lynch was born. The woman’s name was Elizabeth Short, although she was nicknamed Black Dahlia because of her arresting beauty and her stylish black hair. The real Elizabeth Short was called Betty by some as a shortened version of her name. I believe this is one of the many possible allusions which explains why there is a major character named Betty in Mulholland Drive… Betty, who is also Diane in Mulholland Drive, is not the only one with something in common with Black Dahlia. Rita, who is also Camilla in the movie, is also a very beautiful woman with an impressive mane of long black hair. Not only that, but like Black Dahlia, this second character’s life will also end with a murder.”

“Pink Floyd’s The Wall” (Alan Parker)

pink-floyd-the-wall

The epic 1979 concept album by Pink Floyd sparked even more interpretations when it was adapted into a film in 1982. This spooky look inside the life of a rock star turned dictator (named Pink Floyd), is accompanied by tracks from the album and scenes inspired by band member Roger Waters. For Bret Urick’s site Pink Floyd’s The Wall: A Complete Analysis, he looks at the movie through examination of every song featured and comes to the conclusion that the film’s meaning is about the need to break down walls of oppression.

“The Wall is about the golden mean and realizing that what you do affects others just as much as the things that are done to you; it’s about being an individual but not to the point of personal and social alienation; it’s about how a person can be so consumed with hatred that he becomes the very thing he hates; it’s about the danger of making gods of men; it’s about the importance of communication, the void of excess, the fullness of the little moments; and above all, it’s about personal, communal and social responsibility.”

Categories: No Categories

Tags: 2012, David lynch, Donnie darko, Jake gyllenhaal, Laura Harring, Mulhollad Drive, Naomi watts, Pink Floyd's The Wall, Richard Kelly, Rodney Ascher, Roger Waters, Roland emmerich, Room 237, Stanley Kubrick, The Shining

Minggu, 19 Mei 2013

Trailer: ‘The Wolverine’

[Via NextMovie] Yesterday, with much fanfare, we proudly presented the first teaser clip for the upcoming superhero blockbuster “The Wolverine.” And it was pretty much the most exciting 20 seconds of your entire life, right? Well, if you thought that was cool, then buckle up, because now thanks to YouTube, we’ve got the entire full-length international trailer for you.

And if you thought the first “Wolverine” tease was grim n’ gritty, wait until you get a load of this new angst.

Of course, hardcore Wolverine fans have been wondering just what angle star Hugh Jackman and director James Mangold were going to take on their loose adaptation of the classic 1982 Chris Claremont-Frank Miller comic that sent Logan to Japan to fight ninjas. And now we know the answer: Turns out Wolverine is seeking a way to become mortal and remove the “curse” of immortality forever.

Which… well, that’s one direction they could go with it, sure. Frankly, we kind of prefer our Wolverine to be a butt-kicking badass not a mopey emotional wreck; that’s why we were disappointed in the first one.

Still, this trailer does have some pretty sweet action going for it, including motorcycles riding on rooftops, a creepy woman ripping her own face off and, of course, those wonderful ninjas. So here’s hoping this film ends up being as cool as its hardcore fanbase wants it to be. Otherwise, well, let’s just say that Wolverine isn’t the only one ready to fly into a berserker rage.

Categories: Trailers

Tags: Hugh jackman, James Mangold, Japan, The Wolverine, Trailer, X-men

Jumat, 17 Mei 2013

The Out Take: Why Gay Filmmakers Aren’t Selling Out When They Make ‘Straight’ Films

toronto_in_the_house_still_-_h_2012

“The Out Take,” is a new bi-weekly column dedicated to queer cinema.

François Ozon’s first feature-length film, 1998’s “Sitcom,” has everything. Gay orgies, a bisexual Cameroonian gym teacher, wheelchair-bound sadomasochism, all sorts of incest, and that thing when your father brings home a little white rat and it turns your bourgeois family into a throbbing pile of “deviant” sexual activity. It’s brimming with transgressive lechery and gleeful camp, woven together by Ozon’s signature disregard for society’s rigid understanding of family, gender and sex. It was also unfairly and almost universally panned upon release.

Ozon’s fortunes have changed quite a bit since then. His new film, “In the House,” seems fairly tame in comparison, and he has become among France’s more internationally successful directors. Yet it seems an unlikely transition, even over the course of fifteen years. His other early features, “Criminal Lovers” and “Water Drops on Burning Rocks,” weren’t exactly adored by the critics. It wasn’t until 2000’s “Under the Sand” that he finally began to cross over to the mainstream of French auteur cinema. That film, perhaps more than incidentally, was also his first to deal exclusively with heterosexual characters.

I’m not going to try to argue that the international critical community, or even the French critical community, refused to take Ozon’s work seriously until it happened to be about straight people. Yet some of their language is suspect, one critic claiming that “Under the Sand” was the critical point at which the enfant terrible had “matured.” One wonders if Ozon knew this would happen.

Moreover, and this is especially true of the American context, it is not at all easy to get funding to make a queer film. Some filmmakers haven’t been able to make queer movies in years, finding a creative outlet on TV or online instead. Yet others compromise and tell straighter, less troublesome stories. On the one hand, they may get Oscar nominations and make a ton of money (“The Kids Are All Right” comes to mind, but so do entirely straight films by New Queer Cinema directors like “Good Will Hunting”). On the other, their more Hollywood work is often not as good as their earlier, more groundbreaking films.

The conundrum is this: as critics and audiences looking for LGBT cinema, how should we respond? Do these filmmakers “sell out,” or is it possible to find some middle ground between the NQC’s art house legacy and the demands of the (ever-increasingly gay friendly) wider audiences? Should we be upset by “The Kids Are All Right?” In the late 1990s, this was a real cause for concern. I’ve heard this complaint more recently, however, and today it’s off the mark.

First, it’s a good idea to get some ideas in order. As I explained last time, it’s impossible to pin down exactly what good queer cinema would even look like as a specific goal. Yet, now that I’m actually trying to make some sort of tangible argument, we need to come up with a way around that. Taking Ozon as a point of departure, I’d like to propose two thematic and stylistic tendencies of queer cinema coming out of the early 1990s.

I’ll start with camp. J. Bryan Lowder is now on Entry 9 of his expertly written and groundbreakingly theoretical Postcards from Camp over at Slate. The crucial distinction he makes in the beginning of his series is that of “camp” versus “campiness.” In his words:

“Campiness, as a style and sensibility, comprises a set of widely appreciated characteristics: frivolity, the celebration of the “so bad it’s good,” the overwrought, the histrionic, what Sontag calls “failed seriousness.” It’s standard midnight-screening fare. But these characteristics are not at all intrinsic to camp. In other words, camp is not the same thing as campy, and the latter, as a popular aesthetic, may well be fading into obscurity while the former, a “way of seeing the world,” soldiers on.”

Ozon has campiness in spades. The delightfully abrupt line dance in “Water Drops on Burning Rocks,” the enormous sexually-coded cucumbers in Sitcom and the entirety of his all-female musical romp “8 Women” prove this. He has company in the work of Pedro Almodóvar, Todd Haynes and Jamie Babbitt, just to name a few. Yet “camp” permeates his work as well, as it does for New Queer Cinema in the US and much of the international queer cinema of the last two decades.

Lowder explains “camp” in the context of Roland Barthes, a compelling argument that I don’t have time for here but in which you should immerse yourself, in his third entry. The gist, for our purposes, is the nuance. It isn’t simply the comedy of campiness, which is only one way of getting at camp. For example: camp in comedy is the bread and butter of early Almodóvar films, like the amateur back-up singing nuns in “Dark Habits.” Yet it also exists in tragedy. Almost every little detail of Patricia Clarkson’s drug addicted German actress in Lisa Cholodenko’s “High Art” can be read as camp, not least of which the refrain of her former collaborations with the now-dead Rainer Werner Fassbinder.

Camp resists. For Lowder, it resists the stereotypical and the obvious of genre and form. I’ll extend this one rhetorical step further. Camp resists the obvious and bland in culture as a whole, making it rebellious. It speaks to the individual alone, and when it makes a point further to speak to the LGBT individual, it’s a form of resistance. Ozon uses it in his early works for certain, as do many of the directors associated with New Queer Cinema.

The second element is a lot simpler. To crunch it down: sex. Yet, like with camp, there are two degrees. There’s the queer sex acts themselves, which you can find in everything from a simplistic gay romcom to complex and controversial films like “Poison” and “Sitcom.” The added layer is when sexuality is used not simply to show gay sex to audiences, but to drive home the fluid gender and sexuality of queer cinema. “Sitcom,” “Bad Education,” “High Art,” and other films drive wedges between our basic and unrelenting definitions of heterosexuality, homosexuality, and bisexuality. The sex itself is only part of the point.

Now that I’ve made a whole bunch of ridiculous claims about the traits of queer cinema and its art, let’s go back to talk of “selling out.” Campiness and lots of explicit sex are the window dressing on the deeper, more interesting elements of queer cinema. Theoretically, it’s therefore possible to make a queer film about straight people. “Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?” certainly accomplished as much. This turns out to be much less of a complicated problem than anticipated, especially when one looks at the actual films.

Let’s take a look at the parallel careers of Haynes and Van Sant. Haynes continued to use queerness in interesting ways, applying it to the Glam Rock era with “Velvet Goldmine” and Sirk’s melodramas with “Far from Heaven.” Both of these are explicitly LGBT films. Yet “I’m Not There” is another creative remix along these lines, queering the life of Bob Dylan by reflecting it off of Arthur Rimbaud and by casting Cate Blanchett as one of his incarnations. The film succeeds.

download (5)

In the end, however, I think the entire conversation may be completely irrelevant in a year or two. In the years since the arrival and then temporary wane of New Queer Cinema, we’ve seen a number of straight directors break open both Hollywood and the international art house in ways that allows for some middle ground. “Brokeback Mountain” and “Happy Together” complemented the growth of LGBT cinema, bringing us over the hill from fighting for representation to simply filming intriguing and artistic stories.

Ozon’s “In the House” manages to be camp in its writerly discourse and in its commentary on contemporary art, and sexually fluid in its re-appropriation of the domestic tensions that “Sitcom” borrowed from Pasolini’s “Teorema.” Cholodenko’s “The Kids Are All Right,” while problematic for a number of reasons, met Hollywood halfway and slipped in a few complex ideas that did stick.

The conclusion to B. Ruby Rich’s compendium on New Queer Cinema (which everyone should go read) points out a number of movies from 2011 and 2012 that twist both camp and gender fluidity in exciting new ways: “Codependent Lesbian Space Alien Seeks Same,” “Pariah,” “Tomboy,” “Keep the Lights On” and “Weekend” all push queer cinema forward. The notion of assimilation to a Hollywood norm is not yet obsolete, but a new renaissance in LGBT cinema (and trans cinema in particular, as Rich stresses), may help us move on from it.

Read the previous installment of The Out Take: “What is Queer Cinema?”

Categories: Columns

Tags: Camp, Daniel Walber, Francois Ozon, In the House, LGBT, Lisa Cholodenko, The kids are all right, The Out Take

Kamis, 16 Mei 2013

The Art House: Making the Movie Poster for ‘Simon Killer’

Screen-Shot-2013-03-27-at-1.37.39-AM1

We’re all looking for answers. For some people it’s spiritual, for others, it’s as simple as finding meaning in their lives. Graphic designers can be a little less subtle: we’re the ones trying to figure out how the person next to us designed something so jaw-droppingly fantastic that our entire career up until that point feels like one long, drawn out con. How can you blame us? In this business, when something comes along that knocks you on your rear, you’ve got two options: sulk in a corner, or brush yourself off and get educated. If this were 1600’s Massachusetts, I suppose you could just start accusing people of witchcraft before having them burnt at the stake for their display of divine (if inhuman) acts. You wouldn’t learn anything, but it’d be one less clever person on the planet. Thankfully, this is the 21st century, so we just send polite emails asking for pointers, instead.

Still, there are more pieces of work out there catalogued in books or by websites than there are explanations of how they came to be. It’s unsurprising, when you think about it: sitting down to construct a singular narrative out of a process that tends to have the hallmarks of a Lynchian nightmare is, well, a challenge. The details are often illogical on the surface and without much discerning order. I’d say that, at the risk or heresy, it’d be easier to just chalk everything up to “magic” and be done with it. But having been and still being one of those people that revels in learning how work is put together, it’d be silly of me to at least not try to delve into what goes into putting a poster together. No one’s demanding I be set up in flames or anything. Talking about how babies are born does feel like the next logical step for this column, though. So here we go.

Late last year I worked with IFCFilms on Antonio Campos’ “Simon Killer.” For the unacquainted, the film follows a recently graduated American traveling abroad whose relationships slowly bring to light his true, troubled nature. It’s an engaging, atmospheric picture that stays with you long after the credits have rolled. And when you’re putting together a poster, being able to get in that headspace, to live in that world, allows for a better synthesis of tone. These days, people seem to favor simple, witty solutions, but often it’s not about showing off how clever you are; the film itself comes first. Being able to drag a feeling out from the screen and onto a page can allow for that while bringing forward something more immersive, possibly even a bit more complex.

But I’m getting ahead of myself here.

Every job is different. Although, there’s a skeleton to the process that tends to be the same. You discuss themes, images, feelings, and ideas – the nuts and bolts of what you’re trying to communicate – with your partners in crime (in this case, Antonio and IFC). Some then head straight to the computer; I wind up scrawling notes and sketches into notebooks and onto scraps of paper, the kind that would look like they make sense to serial killers and forensic experts. Believe me, I can barely make sense of them long after a project’s done. See for yourself:

sk_3

Basically, you know that drawer that everyone has in their house filled with things that don’t have a home but just ache for a place to be tossed and forgotten about? My notebook is like that. Granted, I come back to it. And sure, it might smell a little less awful, but any idea, now matter how foolish, gets pulled out of the old noggin and stuffed in there. This might be infuriatingly cheesy and cliched, but it frees up space for other ideas to crop up while holding me back from harboring one thing for too long. Chip Kidd said it best: never fall in love with an idea. They’re whores.

There’s an honest truth in that, especially when you realize that sketching alone usually gets you a quarter of the way to the finish line, often through momentum alone. Staring at a blank page is terrifying; having several filled with barely discernable nonsense to guide you makes it less so.

sk_1

Most of the key elements that made their way into the rough comps on the computer were born during that, with the main drive early on focusing on Simon himself. He’s a lonely, isolated character, and you get the sense that his attempts at connecting with other human beings are ultimately hollow. I tried blending that together with the lights and color along the Parisian night sky, playing towards his fragile emotional state and hoping to evoke something dreamy but altogether unsettling. Some of the roughs were good, others complete failures. Type and image work together, and when you’ve got large, menacing shots of the star bathed in red glowing light with the words “Simon Killer” underneath, you start to marginalize the film rather than honor it’s breadth and scope.

These are the things learned along the way. You try, you fail, you fail harder, you move on. Rarely do solutions fall from the sky fully hatched (although, it has been known to happen – in the bathroom, inconveniently enough). Sometimes you’re methodically working towards a solution; other times, it’s like play, except you’re feeling around in the dark for what you think is a light switch…that’s supposed to be at the furthest corner of the room that you can’t see. On the wall. And to the right.

sk_2

This was more of the latter.

We shed a fair amount of work, somewhere in the double digits (as you usually do) and landed on two directions: the first was a very dark, yet vibrant red poster of a naked woman bathed in the blur of the city lights. A last ditch attempt at trying to bring together the relationship between sex and violence that slightly underscores the picture while being audacious enough to grab people’s attention. I’d show you, but honestly, aren’t some things better left to the imagination?

Unused color + light blending studies. Pieces cannibalized for the final poster. Unused color + light blending studies. Pieces cannibalized for the final poster.

And then the final which, oddly enough, I can’t say much about. This is a process post about a design that came together at the end very quickly, Frankensteined out of bits and pieces that weren’t working as well on their own. It heavily trades in on poster cues from the 70s (entirely appropriate given the mood of the film), while pulling together ideas touched upon earlier without being burdened by living up to an image of the main character. And that’s ok. That’s what process is about: falling on your rear and learning from your mistakes along the way so that you, hopefully, wind up being able to walk in a straight line without looking like a dope.

The final poster. The final poster.

To wrap this up, a few things. First, you’re only as good as the people you are surrounded with. Both IFC and Antonio have a sharp eye, and if it weren’t for their presence throughout all of this there’d be no poster. Obviously. But it’s never said enough how much of a difference smart, brave people can make in allowing work through the door that doesn’t make you squirm at night. Second, and lastly, for the one person out there that actually reads this, gets to the end, and asks, “Yeah, but how did you make it?” Easy: I took a picture of my eye one morning after breakfast and now it’s looking out back at you whenever you stare at that poster.

Sweet dreams.

“Simon Killer” is currently playing in select theaters, and opens on VOD this Friday.

See more of Brandon’s work on his website.

Read the previous installment of “The Art House” here.

Categories: Columns

Tags: Antonio Campos, Ifc films, Process Post, Simon killer, The Art House

Selasa, 14 Mei 2013

WELCOME TO THE PUNCH (2013)

WELCOME TO THE PUNCH (2013)

Tanggal Rilis : 15 March 2013 (UK)
Jenis Film : Action | Adventure | Crime
Diperankan Oleh : James McAvoy, Mark Strong, Andrea Riseborough

Ringkasan Cerita WELCOME TO THE PUNCH (2013) :

Former criminal Jacob Sternwood (Mark Strong) is forced to return to London from his Icelandic hideaway when his son is involved in a heist gone wrong. This gives detective Max Lewinsky (James McAvoy) one last chance to catch the man he has always been after. As they face off, they start to uncover a deeper conspiracy they both need to solve in order to survive.

[IMDb rating : 6.4/10]
[Awards : - ]
[Production Co : Worldview Entertainment, Between The Eyes]
[IMDb link : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1684233]

[Quality : WEB-DL 720p]
[File Size : 600 MB]
[Format : Matroska >> mkv]
[Resolution : 1280x528]
[Source : 720p.WEB-DL.H264-CtrlHD]
[Encoder : nItRo]

BillionUploads
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Fileswap
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Uppit
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Zippyshare
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
180upload
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders

Download English Subtitle
Download Indonesian Subtitle

Bagi Pengunjung Baru klik di sini Cara Menggabungkan File Ekstensi .001 dan .002


( klik " Like " Dan " +1 " jika kamu suka Film ini )

Senin, 13 Mei 2013

Top 5 / Bottom 5: Ryan Gosling Movies

Ryan-Gosling-Place-Beyond-the-Pines-e1364545412596

With “The Place Beyond the Pines,” Ryan Gosling’s super-intense intensity is back in action, and the re-teaming with director Derek Cianfrance (“Blue Valentine”) is once again drawing raves. But will it be able to crack the lineup of Gosling’s best films? I suppose we should take a look at where that list currently stands. (And, fine, while we’re at it, what are his 5 worst films? No point in being Pollyannas about it.)

TOP 5

1.) “Drive” (2011)

Nicolas Winding Refn’s film wasn’t so much “All Style, No Substance” as “All Style, What Even Is Substance, Never Mind, I’m Not Listening.” When your film is this slick and lush and swimming around in its own atmosphere the way “Drive” is, a bare-bones story is easily forgiven. Gosling is given an absolute gift of a character, all badass poses and cool silence, but he pulls it off without seeming like a pretender, and that’s harder than it would seem.

2.) “Blue Valentine” (2010)

A punishing tale of the attrition of romance over time, Gosling and Michelle Williams deliver brilliant, arguably career-best work opposite each other, ultimately devastating themselves and the audience.

3.) “Lars and the Real Girl” (2007)

You have to wonder how this movie would be received if Gosling made it now, after he’s honed his Lil’ Brando onscreen persona so sharply. Would such an obviously strange role be seen as a quirky affectation. Somehow, in 2007, “Lars” didn’t come across that way. The story of a man and his love for a life-size sex doll was so grounded in relatable characters and honest performances (Gosling got great support from Emily Mortimer, Paul Schneider, and Kelli Garner), it repelled any charges of over-quirk you could throw at it.

4.) “The Notebook” (2004)

COME AT ME! Look, the simple truth is that Gosling would have never managed to make the leap to taciturn tough-guy roles in Serious Action Movies if he hadn’t ever made a huge splash in the unapologetically romantic “The Notebook.” His real-life romance with Rachel McAdams boosted the film’s appeal, sure, but at its heart, Nick Cassavetes film knows what it has in the Gosling/McAdams chemistry and lets it work its magic.

5.) “The Believer” (2001)

Gosling’s breakthrough role as a Jewish neo-Nazi in Henry Bean’s provocative indie drama is probably still his most surprising. Gosling’s quiet intensity here (and in “Drive,” and in “The Place Beyond the Pines,” and in just about everything else) is contrasted with the oddball charisma you’d find in later movies like “Lars,” and “Crazy, Stupid, Love.”

BOTTOM 5

2003_The_United_States_027

1.) “The United States of Leland” (2003)

An unremarkable slog through the usual indie-tragedy beats, this was another movie that pushed Gosling into anti-charisma territory, but there was nowhere for him, or the story, to go. Sad people dealing with tragedy sadly. Not much else.

2.) “Crazy, Stupid, Love.” (2011)

This was a movie that had its moments, most of them involving Gosling, actually. His chemistry with co-stars Steve Carell and Emma Stone provided the jolt that kept this thing buzzing for the first two thirds. Too bad the rest of the movie falls apart around him, including ill-advised plot diversions and a final-act twist that deep-sixes the Stone character and leaves a far flatter, two-dimensional story in its wake.

3.) “Gangster Squad” (2013)

An all-star cast — Gosling! Penn! Brolin! Sone! Ribisi! — in service of something both preposterous and slick at once. Somehow, despite coming off of a movie where he stomped a guy’s face flat in an elevator, “Gangster Squad” stands as the most distastefully violent entry in Gosling’s filmography.

4.) “Stay” (2005)

“Stay” could have actually been a solid movie if it had remained waaaaay more vague and wasn’t intent on wrapping things up in a neat short-story twist. Gosling, Ewan McGregor, and Naomi Watts are all pretty solid, and the atmosphere is unsettling and stylish, but it just goes WAY too hard for the clever mind-blower.

5.) “The Ides of March” (2011)

Boy, what a disappointment. George Clooney taking on personality politics with an ace cast (Philip Seymour Hoffman AND Paul Giamatti?? But who’s minding the Purposefully Disheveled Thespian Clubhouse? (“Shlubhouse”?) should have been at the very least a rousing and entertaining potboiler. Instead, it pulled every one of its punches and passed on each and every opportunity to make the cool, interesting choice.

Categories: Lists

Tags: Blue valentine, Drive, Joe reid, Lars and the Real Girl, Ryan gosling, The Believer, The notebook, The Place Beyond The Pines, Top 5 Bottom 5, United States of Leland

Minggu, 12 Mei 2013

Movies Streaming This Week: ‘Django Unchained,’ ‘The Impossible’ and More

django-unchained-2

This week we have the latest from Quentin Tarantino, “Django Unchained,” the best avenging slave western you’ll see this year. If you want to get even more depressing check out Ewan McGregor and Naomi Watts playing parents who get swept away in a tsunami and their heart-wrenching journey to reconnect in “The Impossible.” And if you’re looking for a streaming marathon, check out the sweet Jim Jarmusch picks on Hulu.

NEW RELEASES

‘Django Unchained’
Quentin Tarantino’s blood soaked Western stars Jamie Foxx as a slave-turned-free-man who is on a mission to find his wife, Broomhilda (Kerry Washington) no matter the cost. With his bounty hunter mentor Dr. Schultz (Christoph Waltz) by his side, the two find their way into the world of Calvin Candie, the twisted owner of a sprawling plantation where Broomhilda is a slave.
Why Watch It: Tarantino is in his genre-loving glory with Waltz giving a entertaining performance, which earned him an Oscar.
Available On: iTunes, VUDU, Amazon Instant [On Demand 4/16]

‘The Impossible’
Set in 2004, Ewan McGregor and Naomi Watts star as parents who find themselves part of a colossal tsunami while vacationing in Thailand. What unfolds is a struggle for survival as they and their children are split up and try to search for one another.
Why Watch It: An heart-wrenching account based on a the mother’s account.
Available On: iTunes, VUDU, Amazon Instant [On Demand 4/23]

‘Venus and Serena’
Here we’re given an all access pass into the lives of the two most polarizing tennis players in the world, and they happen to be sisters. Directors Maiken Baird and Michelle Major highlight the lives of Venus and Serena Williams in 2011, while both were suffering career-ending injuries.
Why Watch It: See a side of the sister that will surprise you.
Available On: Cable On Demand [In Theaters May 10]

‘LUV’
In an impressive performance by Common, the rapper plays an ex-con who agrees to spend the day with his nephew and in the process exposes him to the realities of everyday life.
Why Watch It: A hit at Sundance, Common works well opposite newcomer Michael Rainey Jr.
Available On: Cable On Demand, iTunes, VUDU

OLDIES BUT GOODIES

three-kings-still

‘Three Kings’
David O. Russell’s heist/war movie follows four soldiers (George Clooney, Mark Wahlberg, Ice Cube and Spike Jonze) at the end of the Gulf War who plot to steal gold from Kuwait but in the process become liberators.
Available On: iTunes, VUDU, Amazon Instant, Redbox Instant, Google Play

‘Midnight Cowboy’
John Schlesinger’s landmark X-Rated best picture winner stars Dustin Hoffman and Jon Voight as down on their luck friends who try to survive the harsh New York City streets in the winter with dreams of moving to Florida.
Available On: iTunes, Netflix, VUDU, Amazon Instant, Redbox Instant

Jim Jarmusch on Hulu
Five Jarmusch titles that have received the Criterion treatment are now available for free on Hulu. Get trapped in the director’s world with come of his classics—Mystery Train, Night on Earth, Stranger Than Paradise, Down By Law and Permanent Vacation.

Categories: Columns, Streaming, Streaming/On Demand

Tags: Amazon Instant, Christoph Waltz, Common, David O. Russell, Django Unchained, Down By Law, Ewan mcgregor, George clooney, Ice Cude, ITunes, Jim Jarmusch, John schlesinger, Jon voight, Kerry washington, LUV, Mark wahlberg, Michael rainey jr., Midnight cowboy, Mystery train, Naomi watts, Netflix, Night and Earth, Permanent Vacation, Quentin tarantino, Redbox Instant, Serena Williams, Spike jonze, Stranger than Paradise, The Impossible, Three kings, Venus and Serena, Venus Williams, VUDU, YouTube

Sabtu, 11 Mei 2013

EAGLE EYE (2008)

EAGLE EYE (2008)

Tanggal Rilis : 15 October 2008 (Indonesia)
Jenis Film : Action | Mystery | Thriller
Diperankan Oleh : Shia LaBeouf, Michelle Monaghan and Rosario Dawson

Ringkasan Cerita EAGLE EYE (2008) :

Jerry Shaw is an amiable slacker with an over-achieving twin brother. After his twin dies in an accident, strange things happen to Jerry at a dizzying pace: a fortune shows up in his bank account, weapons are delivered to his flat, and a voice on his cell phone tells him the police are on their way. Jerry follows the voice’s instructions, and soon he and a woman he’s never met are racing through the city, on to a plane, and eventually to the Pentagon, chased by the FBI. She is Rachel Holloman, a single mom; the voice has threatened her son’s death if she doesn’t cooperate. The voice seems to know everything. Who is behind it, what is being planned, and why Jerry and Rachel?

[IMDb rating : 6.6/10]
[Awards : 2 wins & 8 nominations]
[Production Co : DreamWorks SKG, Goldcrest Pictures, KMP Film Invest]
[IMDb link : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1059786]

[Quality : BRRip 720p]
[File Size : 650 MB]
[Format : Matroska >> mkv]
[Resolution : 1280x534]
[Source : 720p.BluRay]

BillionUploads
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 |
Extract with winrar
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Megaload
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 |
Extract with winrar
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Uppit
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 |
Extract with winrar
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Zippyshare
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 |
Extract with winrar
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
180upload
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 |
Extract with winrar
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Single Link
Download Single File 180upload

Download English Subtitle
Download Indonesian Subtitle

Bagi Pengunjung Baru klik di sini Cara Menggabungkan File Ekstensi .001 dan .002


( klik " Like " Dan " +1 " jika kamu suka Film ini )

Kamis, 09 Mei 2013

MANBORG (2011)

MANBORG (2011)

Tanggal Rilis : 22 September 2011 (USA)
Jenis Film : Action | Adventure | Comedy
Diperankan Oleh : Matthew Kennedy, Adam Brooks, Meredith Sweeney

Ringkasan Cerita MANBORG (2011) :

Count Draculon (Adam Brooks) and his nazi vampire forces seek to take over Earth during the Hell Wars. A soldier (Matthew Kennedy) is killed attempting to fight the Count, then transformed into Manborg after his body is fitted with robotics. After Manborg becomes active in Mega-Death City, he meets with resistance fighters against Count Draculon. Justice (Conor Sweeney) is a gunfighter who resembles Billy Idol with an Australian accent who is joined by his sister Mina (Meredith Sweeney) and martial arts expert #1 Man (Ludwig Lee, voice-dubbed by Kyle Hebert).

[IMDb rating : 6.0/10]
[Awards : 1 win]
[Production Co : Astron-6]
[IMDb link : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2060525]

[Quality : BRRip 720p]
[File Size : 425 MB]
[Format : Matroska >> mkv]
[Resolution : 1280x528]
[Source : 720p.BluRay.x264-LHD]
[Encoder : nItRo]

BillionUploads
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Fileswap
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Uppit
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Zippyshare
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
180upload
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders

Download English Subtitle (Not available yet)
Download Indonesian Subtitle (Not available yet)

Bagi Pengunjung Baru klik di sini Cara Menggabungkan File Ekstensi .001 dan .002


( klik " Like " Dan " +1 " jika kamu suka Film ini )