Sabtu, 10 Agustus 2013

Ranked: Counting Down Michael Bay’s Films from Worst to Best

From Holloman to Hollywood, Transformers make movie magic

“I make movies for teenage boys. Oh dear, what a crime.”

People tend to hate Michael Bay for what he represents, and the fact that he represents it so unrepentantly. His is a cinema of crass excess – a perma-pubescent who doesn’t know how to love anything without fetishizing it, he’s the Yasujiro Ozu of “vulgar auteurism” (don’t hurt yourself trying to unpack that one).

A graduate of Wesleyan University who got his start shooting commercials for the likes of Coca-Cola, Bay inserted himself into the movie business when he teamed up with Jerry Bruckheimer for “Bad Boys.” Yes, “Bad Boys” was his FIRST. FILM. That’s like showing up for your driver’s license test in a fighter jet. From there, Bay blew up, eager to bring his particularly destructive brand of cinema anywhere that could sustain an explosion. If you can name it, Bay can nuke it.

Bay’s persona is staunchly unapologetic, which makes it that much stranger and unappreciated that yesterday he apologized for “Armageddon,” which we’ll soon learn is hardly the worst film that he’s ever made. He’s also one of the few iconic auteurs of the last 20 years whose entire body of work has probably been seen by huge swaths of the American public – simply by virtue of going to the biggest new movie in town, even casual moviegoers might unknowingly be familiar with the complete output of Michael Bay.

With that in mind, and with his latest (and perhaps smallest) film “Pain & Gain” opening on Friday, hopefully you’ll all be able to form your own opinions on our rundown of Michael Bay’s directorial career, ranked from worst to best. Feel free to rant and rave about our choices in the comments section, it’s what Bay would want.

9.) TRANSFORMERS (2007)

6

“What are you rolling? Whippets? Goof balls? A little wowie sauce with the boys?”

A tonal nightmare that remains the only “Transformers” film to make the cardinal sin of trying to tell a coherent story, Bay’s most toxically stupid blockbuster set the tone for the franchise but failed to find its rhythm. Bay has been raked over the coals for his supposedly choppy and inelegant action sequences, but utter incoherence would have been better than the noncommittal stabs at middle ground that drive the set pieces here.

The problem with “Transformers” is that it doesn’t do anything enough – much like the alien robots that lend the film its title, the first installment of Bay’s most massive franchise can’t commit to any particular form, and settles for artlessness. It’s as crass as either of its sequels (the bit in which a Transformer “pees” on John Turturro is a low point for human / machine relations), but lacks the one thing that no Michael Bay film can survive without: reckless confidence.

8.) TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN (2009)

Optimus Prime from Michael Bay's Transformers Revenge of the Fallen.

“That’s old school, yo. That’s like… That’s Cybertronian.”

So yeah, conventional wisdom is that this sequel is and always will be Michael Bay’s greatest offense, but the untethered madness of the whole thing earns my most begrudging respect, the insane spectacle of its climactic battle on the Great Pyramids as hard to follow as it is to ignore. “Revenge of the Fallen” is a film in which Bay’s resources have clearly outpaced his vision, the divots left by the writers’ strike filled with shamelessly racist caricatures and useless sidekicks.

The college shenanigans are enjoyably out of their mind (Isabel Lucas’ robot sex tail is a classic, but a classic of what I’m not so sure), and the towering IMAX presentation was certainly the overload the first film was lacking. But when the story is that bad, a little incoherence goes a long way.

7.) THE ISLAND (2005)

Screen Shot 2013-04-23 at 1.30.45 PM

“That tongue thing is amazing!”

The first half of Bay’s most high-concept film uses wet gloss and ripe body horror to varnish over the fact that it’s dystopian story of simple-minded clones (being harvested to supply organs for their real-world equivalents, natch) is the kind of thing that Rod Serling could have written over the course of a single cigarette. Scarlett Johansson is perfectly cast as the bashfully naive Jordan Two Delta, her round features and flawless skin used to subvert her lab-grown celebrity image.

It’s all compelling enough until the clones escape and become the targets of a hugely destructive manhunt across a bland cityscape, the chaos merely serviceable when compared to the full-throated action sequences of Bay’s other films, which are not similarly burdened by the demands of such a wild premise. The third act’s inevitable return to the farm is as flat and perfunctory as anything Bay has ever shot, interesting only in how it lamely evinces a boneheaded pro-life argument.

6.) PEARL HARBOR (2001)

Screen Shot 2013-04-23 at 1.27.16 PM

“I joined the army to do MY patriotic duty… AND… to meet guys.”

It was probably inevitable that “Pearl Harbor” would eventually be regarded as Bay’s most awful disasterpiece, as it pulverizes one of the most violent days in American history in an orgy of plastic pop culture. Bay’s ego is notoriously bombastic, and his cinema only works because he enters every room a couple seconds ahead of his feet, but a different kind of gall is required to turn tragedy into spectacle, memorializing a generation of Americans while selling their grandkids duffel bags full of popcorn.

There’s a Fordian “aw shucks” mentality to this love triangle between two good midwestern boys and the gal they both loved (there’s also a Fordian racism to the portrait of the Japanese), but the pop smear of Bay’s approach conflates the greatest pre-9/11 foreign attack on American soil with a tawdry romance that shamelessly targets modern teens by aping another international event, “Titanic.” It’s like doing brain surgery by going through the groin. Ben Affleck kickstarted a decade of irrelevance with his wooden flyboy, and Bay decided that he’d be better of focusing on box office history.

THE COUNTDOWN CONTINUES ON PAGE 2!

Categories: No Categories

Tags: Bad boys, Michael bay, Pain & Gain, Ranked, The rock, Transformers

Jumat, 09 Agustus 2013

Director’s Cut: Five Questions with François Ozon (‘In the House’)

9be6668afca2760ff2edd79c591efa61

It can be hard to keep up with François Ozon, a prolific and prodigiously talented French filmmaker who’s been reliably churning out modern classics like “Swimming Pool” and “5 x 2? on a near-annual basis since the turn of the millennium. And it’s not like he’s slowing down – his latest film, “In the House,” hits theaters today, and it’s arguably the best thing he’s ever made. The story of a strange teenage boy who embeds himself in a friend’s house in order to mine material for his high school writing class, “In the House” won the San Sebastían Film Festival in 2012, and it finally arrives in American theaters today (here’s what our critic had to say about it).

Film.com had a brief opportunity to chat with Ozon at the Toronto International Film Festival last September, where he told us all about how much he wants to disturb you.

Film.com: Facts, perception, and subjectivity are integral ideas to this film. At a certain point, the reality of things starts to become unclear. Do you feel that there are certain points in the film that absolutely happened?

François Ozon: For me, everything is relative. Everything is relative because I think dreams are relative too. I think that things don’t need to happen … if they happen emotionally, they happen for me. So that’s what interests me. It’s up to the audience to feel what they want. But I tried my way of shooting the scenes to make no difference between what is relative and what is not to be relative.When you see Claude sleeping so you can think it’s a dream, it’s just a deep thought. We work on that in the editing. We try to subvert everything. But the audience has to work. You have to do your own work.

I like to work with genre, I like to disturb the audience using this kind of story and then suddenly changing … you think it will be sad and actually it’s funny. I know it’s disturbing, but that’s what I like.

Do you think that most audiences will rise to that challenge and embrace the ambiguity?

Well, this film is too ambiguous to be a blockbuster. But I know some American people have said to me this would be a very good remake…but they would change everything.

You have to decide – what [in the story] is true? What’s not true? What’s the reality of everything? I remember a film which I think was quite good but was a big flop in America. It was called … “Birth,” with Nicole Kidman. It’s quite a good film, except for the end which was totally remade. Because I think the script was very ambiguous but they decided to show everything at the end to give an explanation, which was so stupid because it kills the film at the end. I don’t need that.

Are there American directors that you’re interested in, or interested in their careers?

The movie directors I love are older European directors who came before or during the war. Especially all the Germans, the Jews …  They are really the directors I love. Yes, there are many good American directors. I like David Lynch, I like older people that have a different way. They are in the system and at the same time they have their own view, their own personality and they’re not totally used by the system. They try to keep their work and point of view.

The Hollywood machine is very restrictive and I think that’s a challenge. For you, is there a type of movie that you simply feel is not in your comfort zone?

For me I’m very open minded. I have no problem, as a spectator I can see many kinds of movies. I can see an art movie, I can see a blockbuster, I have pleasure with everything. As a director, I won’t be about to do an action movie, not in term of techniques but in terms of interest. It doesn’t interest me to shoot some cars, some explosions, those kind of things. It doesn’t interest me so I think I won’t be good to do an action movie. Maybe science fiction, I’m not sure. It would be a very twisted science fiction movie.

It would be the best kind of science fiction movie. The last thing I wanted to ask you is just about the young actor who played Claude. The role required a very nuanced performa … I couldn’t decide if he was a wounded bird or a very wicked boy. Was there something specific you were looking for in him?

Yes actually you know the boy is 16 in the film, so my first work doing the cast was to meet many boys of 16. And I realized they are babies. The girls at 16 are already very often women but the boys they are 16 and stuck to their mothers. So I was afraid, because I said this was the lead part, I have to find someone. So I decided to open the cast and to see older boys. And I saw a picture of Ernst and I thought he had a beautiful look in his eyes, a way of watching the camera. And so I met him, and actually he’s 21 but he looks even 14 or 12 sometimes.

I know the producer was not sure about him because he was not as good as some others who were technically much better but they didn’t have the ambiguity. I know it may have been more difficult with him, but he could be very good and we worked a lot and I learned to know from where he came. And actually he’s very close to the character because lives in a small country, in a small city, not in Paris, he has a difficult background with his family and it was good for the theme. So he had many links, many connections with the character of Claude and he was totally involved and I think at the end it was very good. He was the best choice.

Categories: Interviews

Tags: Director's cut, Francois Ozon, In the House, Interview

Kamis, 08 Agustus 2013

Eric’s Bad Movies: ‘Barney’s Great Adventure’ (1998)

MCDBAGR EC003

Even the most desensitized aficionados of cinematic perversion cringe at the thought of “Barney’s Great Adventure,” a terrifying drama about three children who foolishly tamper with the dark powers of “imagination” and thereby conjure into existence an anthropomorphic dinosaur whose mirthless playtime revelry leaves them psychologically scarred and unable to cope with the realities of life. Draw near, if you dare, and pay heed as I relate the horrific tale.

The tone is established by the song that plays over the opening credits, in which young listeners are given this dangerous advice:

“If Barney the dinosaur
Comes knocking on your front door
Just go and play with him
Find your way with him
To the world of imagination.”

Having told impressionable viewers that they ought to run off with anyone who comes to their house claiming to be a TV dinosaur, the film begins its grim story in earnest.

It is summertime, and a family is headed to Grandma and Grandpa’s farm in upstate New York, where Mom and Dad will leave the kids for a week while they go off and enjoy some time far, far away from their children. The boy, Cody (Trevor Morgan), is a miserable little bastard who HATES the boring farm and is “too cool” to play along when his younger sister, Abby (Diana Rice), tries to engage him in conversation with her stuffed Barney doll. Cody absolutely despises imagination, creativity, and joy. Cody and Abby have a baby brother who doesn’t matter and I don’t know why he’s in the movie. Also, Abby has brought along her friend, Marcella (Kyla Pratt), who is African American and is in the movie so that the movie wouldn’t only be about white people.

Fun fact: Every person who appears in this movie is now a heroin addict!

As soon as they get to the farm, Cody runs off with the Barney doll and hides it in the bathtub. Has he realized that the doll is a pernicious token of evil? No, he is just being a brat. Abby and Marcella, unable to find the toy, use their imagination — whereupon the shower turns itself on, and suddenly, there in the place where the doll had been stands Barney himself. The girls summoned him, in much the same way that saying “Bloody Mary” three times in the bathroom mirror will make Bloody Mary appear, or the way that mentioning “Star Wars” and hockey while eating Cheetos will conjure Kevin Smith.

Surely this is the most terrifying thing that has ever happened to these children, right? I mean, it’s not even close, right? No matter what trauma or fear the kids might have experienced heretofore, it would be nothing compared to the shock of finding a fictional character standing in their grandparents’ shower.

But Barney, whimsical demon-spawn that he is, just laughs and asks for a towel. Appearing in bathrooms is not unusual for Barney the purple talking dinosaur! Why, sometimes he’ll show up in a child’s dark closet or under its bed in the middle of the night, just for kicks. Nothing delights Barney more than surprising the pee — the very pee — out of the children who love him.

Fun fact: To create the unique sound of Barney’s giggle, audio engineers mixed recordings of geese, donkeys, and the screams of damned souls in Hell!

Abby and Marcella are overjoyed to meet their idol, and instantly agree to do his bidding, whatever it may be, all hail to Barney. Cody remains dedicated to being surly. “Look, pal,” he says. “Real dinosaurs don’t talk.” HE’S GOT YOU THERE, YOU WIDE-BOTTOMED HARBINGER OF SORROW! But Barney replies, “I’m as real as your imagination!” — which 1) isn’t an answer and 2) means he is not real at all, since things that exist in one’s imagination are, by definition, imaginary. (To be fair, Barney is not accustomed to having existential arguments with anyone over the age of 5.)

Cody refuses to believe Barney is real. “If you’re here because of my imagination, then you’re about to disappear!” he exclaims, demonstrating more logical reasoning than anyone else so far. He closes his eyes and says, “I do not believe in you.” But it doesn’t work. Once summoned, Barney cannot be destroyed. “That’s OK, Cody,” the immortal plush reptile says. “I believe in you!”

MCDBAGR EC007

Fun fact: In ancient Sumerian legend, Barney was a vengeance god who escorted disobedient children to the underworld, where he feasted on their flesh for eternity!

What transpires next, occupying the remainder of the film, is an adventure so nightmarish and surreal it would make Luis Buñuel throw up in his hat. A shooting star passes overhead and delivers a large, basketball-sized egg to the barn. Barney and the kids find the space egg and want to know what’s inside it, and though the movie is very pro-imagination, in this case it is necessary to use actual science. So they take the egg to a kooky lady named Mrs. Goldfinch, who has a house in the woods that serves as both a library and an egg museum. She is the local expert on birds, eggs, and the Dewey decimal system.

Mrs. Goldfinch and Barney and the kids sing a song about the mystery of the egg as they bounce merrily through the place, pulling books off shelves and making guesses. (“Maybe it’s a chimpanzee!” says one of the kids, stupidly.) At last the answer is revealed by one of the books: the egg contains a Dreammaker! Nobody knows what that is, but it sounds nice. It will hatch once the five rings on the shell change color, but only if the kids have returned it to the barn by then. That ought to be a very simple task, and it would be in the real world. In this world, however, all the people responsible for transporting the egg back to the barn are clumsy and butterfingered, and the egg itself is apparently coated with a lubricant, because it is CONSTANTLY getting away from them.

Doh! I dropped the egg and it rolled down the hill into the back of a wagon! Zoing! Now the wagon is driving into town, right in the middle of the Merrivale Apple Day Festival! Yikes! I got a hold of the egg, but then it flew out of my hands and landed in the marching band’s tuba, and the tuba player blasted a really strong note and blew the egg across the street through the open door of that fancy French restaurant! This egg is gigantic, yet invisible to everyone except us and evidently as light as a feather!

Do you like movies where the characters have to keep doing essentially the same thing over and over again? Of course not. Nobody does. The fiends who made “Barney’s Great Adventure,” in addition to disregarding the customary meanings of the words “great” and “adventure,” also intentionally devised a story that cannot be enjoyed. It is a Sisyphean ordeal, if Sisyphus had occasionally paused from his labors to sing “Twinkle Twinkle Little Star,” “Old McDonald Had a Farm,” and other songs from the public domain.

Fun fact: Even though it was an American production, “Barney’s Great Adventure” had to be filmed in Canada because of strict anti-obscenity regulations!

Cody gets over his aversion to imagination, at one point imagining an ordinary log into a biplane so that he, the girls, and Barney can catch up with the hot air balloon that now has the space egg. (Don’t ask.) The egg is recovered and taken back to the barn, where it hatches into an ALF-looking thing that shows everybody their dreams. Which seems pretty useless, since people generally already know what their own dreams are. And not to get technical, but if all you do is show people’s dreams, you’re not really a Dream maker, are you? Just one more damnable lie from this grueling, hell-spawned torment masquerading as a children’s movie.

Categories: Columns

Tags: Barney's Great Adventure, Eric's bad movies, WTF

Rabu, 07 Agustus 2013

Exclusive Clip: ‘Lily’ (2013 Tribeca Film Festival)

large_lily_pubs

We’re only about halfway through this year’s edition of The Tribeca Film Festival, but I have a hard time believing that anything is gonna displace Matt Creed’s debut feature as my favorite premiere of the fest. “Lily” is a beautifully rendered portrait of a young woman preparing to take the next step as she finishes treatment for breast cancer, a film that’s tiny but true, as precise as it is universally relatable. Indebted to the free-flowing spirit of John Cassavetes and inspired by lead actress Amy Grantham’s fight with cancer, “Lily” is the kind of movie that proves – among other things – that there’s hope for indie film beyond the likes of Sundance and SXSW, and that Tribeca is full of buried treasure if you know where to look.

I recently chatted with Matt and Amy about how “Lily” came to be, and we’ll have that interview up on the site in the next little bit, but for now we’re super pleased to present an exclusive clip from the film. It might seem like a strange excerpt, but this bit of footage nicely articulates the two worlds that Lily is forced to navigate between.

“Lily” will screen two more times at TFF, and will play at other festivals over the coming months.

Categories: No Categories

Tags: Exclusive Clip, Lily, Tribeca Film Festival 2013

Selasa, 06 Agustus 2013

First Trailer for ‘Thor: The Dark World’

[From MTV] With “Iron Man 3? a little more than a week away, Marvel has already given us a look at our next trip to the universe of superheroes and villains. The first teaser trailer for “Thor: The Dark World” premiered in the early hours of the morning, and even though the preview clocks in at just under two minutes, we can already see a much different adventure for the Norse god.

“Thor: The Dark World” picks up after the events of “The Avengers.” Thor (Chris Hemsworth) has returned home to Asgard, but a new force threatens both the god’s home world and Earth. As it’s revealed near the end of the trailer, Thor must turn to his brother and rival Loki (Tom Hiddleston) for assistance when trying to save the Nine Realms from the dark elves.

Natalie Portman makes a welcome return to the Marvel universe as Jane Foster, Thor’s Earth-bound love, who finds herself in Asgard shortly after the start of the preview. A menacing voice over from the film’s main baddie, the dark elf Malekith, played by “G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra” actor Christopher Eccleston, suggests that Jane may stand directly in harm’s way with only Thor to protect her.

Read more at MTV, and be sure to check out the brand new trailer, embedded above!

Categories: No Categories

Tags: Marvel, Thor: The Dark World, Trailer

Minggu, 04 Agustus 2013

Fast, Cheap & Out of Control: The Dangers of Michael Bay Going Low-Budget

pain-and-gain-poster

First off, this weekend’s “Pain & Gain” is shaping up to be a rousing financial success. Made for a relatively paltry $22 million, and with Michael Bay reportedly working for scale, it would seem this would be a case of a director returning to his roots – something to laud, appreciate, and ultimately reward. Unfortunately, nothing could be further from the truth, and I’d like to break down the myriad reasons why Michael Bay entering the arena of low-budget cinema is a looming disaster.

1. $22 million is still an awful lot of money

The fascination with production budgets can be traced all the way back to “Ben Hur” in 1925, a film made for a now smallish-seeming $142 million (adjusted for inflation, natch). Then came “Cleopatra” which either cost $233 million or $325 million, depending on how you define budget and which source you’re citing. Everyone remembers the “Waterworld” debacle, and even last year there was much hand-wringing around the sinking ship that was “John Carter”. So it would be safe to say that production budgets have become a shorthand for expectations. Is this a huge summer tentpole a la “The Avengers” (made for $220 million)? Or is it an award-seeking fall drama looking to score with The Academy, something along the lines of “Black Swan” ($13 million)? Either way, you know where you stand.

Not so with “Pain & Gain” – a film looking for all the world like an action set piece, fast cars, ladies in bikinis, copious amounts of gun fire. All brought in for a reasonable price!

But there are only two outcomes here. The first one is that the film is horrible, everyone rolls their eyes, demanding Michael Bay go back to spending all the studio money he can get his hands on. This would make for a bummer of a weekend, but it wouldn’t be half as troubling as the alternative. For what if “Pain & Gain” is awesome? Fun, fast, action-packed, adrenaline-fueled mayhem playing like the fondly remembered “Bad Boys”? That would mean Michael Bay has been stealing for the better part of two decades. Because it’s one or the other – you can make a great film for a zillion dollars, because that’s what it costs, or you can’t, because greatness in the summer season costs money. The idea of a $22 million film that works on every level basically indicates sanctioned incompetence has ruled Hollywood ever since the ’70s golden era ended. We’d all have to ask, “Where’s the money, Michael Bay? Where’s the money?”

But what of that noble deed that pushed down the budget, his smaller salary?

2. A 48-year old working below his pay grade isn’t admirable, it artificially forces down all wages and destroys the leverage of the younger directors.

pain-gain

Now I know what you’re saying, and let me disable you of a few notions straightaway. First off, could the technology have progressed to the point where huge budgets are no longer needed? Cameras are cheaper, they are handing out tax subsides for filmmaking as if they were Mentos, and frenetic handheld shots are cheap and en vogue. So perhaps Michael Bay needed almost $200 million for the third installment of “Transformers” but here, without CGI, he can afford to cut some corners?

However, even if I cede that point (which I don’t), one of the ways Michael Bay brought in a cheaper movie was by paying himself scale. Scale, in this case, is around $100,000, not too shabby, but a far cry from the $40 million he made (overall) on “Pearl Harbor” and a pittance compared to the eight percent of all the “Transformers” toys sold he collects. Basically, Michael Bay can afford to work for nothing because he’s worth an estimated $400 million. You know who can’t afford to work for nothing? Directors just starting out. Directors who would kill for a budget of $22 million, directors who, once they’ve “made it” are hoping to cash in just once on a seven-figure payday. Michael Bay taking scale, likely with points on the back-end, is a luxury that about half a dozen people directing in Hollywood have.

Then there’s this ludicrous argument that great artists should be willing to work for free, pay be damned, but this places all of the power in the hands of those who run commerce, and none in the hands of the artists. Michael Bay taking on “Pain & Gain” means there was one less chance for an aspiring director to get a job, and once they do get a job, they will be paid less. Bay could have easily, were he feeling charitable, handed out a huge gig to a director who showed promise, which would then allow that person to be choosy about his or her next project, meaning the next film down the road might have meant something to the individual.

In fact, Michael Bay is all too familiar with this method of farming out work, because he founded Platinum Dunes, and they specialize in horror remakes that come in costing around $20 million. Michael Bay is already out there cashing in on horror remakes (everyone loves those!) but now he’s actively hurting the careers of those who will come afterward. I’m not even mad, I’m impressed.

But what of …

3. The “Bad Boys” Conundrum

martin_lawrence_and_will_smith_in_bad_boys_ii_hd_wallpaper-HD

“Bad Boys” was made for something under $30 million in 1995. In 2003? “Bad Boys II” cost $130 million, meaning the cost of being bad and also boys quintupled. Might “Pain & Gain II” bring Michael Bay right back to a huge budget, rendering any slick nods toward more efficient filmmaking massively irrelevant? (don’t take this too literally, as “Pain & Gain” isn’t exactly the most sequel-friendly film Bay has made).

Then there is …

4. The “change agent” aspect of indie film

We’re only now starting to see the fruits of lean and mean filmmaking, crowd-sourcing, cheap high definition cameras and the de-localization of movie production pivoting out of Hollywood. “Pain & Gain” presents a serious challenge to all of that, however, in that studios don’t need to change, don’t need to recruit new talent, and will show very healthy financial statements by merely giving every established action director a few bucks to deliver rote entertainment with. In a very real sense, Hollywood’s continued building up of budgets allows for the smaller filmmaking to stand out in juxtaposition, the vibrant ecosystem existing beneath the towering canopy jungle. If Michael Bay can deliver a profitable action film on the cheap, why do we need Sundance? The continued expectation of increased budget has made the wounds much deeper on the misses, which often necessitates firings, new blood, and encourages new ways of doing things. These “new” ways are often great news for audiences, because commercial art informs out culture, and culture is not a statue, it’s a river. Mikey Bay wants to clog that river up!

Speaking of …

5. “Pain & Gain” will likely be free of artistic merit

There’s something to be said for the struggle of making the industry a healthier and more dynamic place. Young filmmakers are doing this, look no further than “Upstream Color” – a haunting film that cost $7,000 for Shane Carruth to make and delivered a more effective mood in the first ten minutes than all of Michael Bay’s films put together. “Pain & Gain” costs much much more than “Upstream Color” and there’s no reason we shouldn’t have let 2,500 people attempt their own version of small-budget film. Yes, even at $22 million, “Pain & Gain” isn’t really helping matters, it’s still far too much money on a film we’ve all seen before, a film whose ceiling is something around the admittedly great “Three Kings” but with a floor around “The Big Hit”.

While “Pain & Gain” might entertain you, there’s very little chance it will add anything to the language of cinema. And for a $22 million outlay, that’s a shame.

6. Critics will go easy on it.

This is being teed up for adoration. The headlines can already be predicted, “A fine return to form!” and “Efficient, spartan action filmmaking at its best!” Sigh. We’d just gotten to the point where people weren’t going to put up with huge “Transformers” films that were terrible, but the process will have to start anew after the super-coddle Bay will be on the receiving end of this weekend.

7. The lessons of the “Transformers” franchise might be lost to history

transformers_racist_robots

There is a butterfly effect at work here as well. Simply put, we need Michael Bay to be terrible so that young persons will be inspired to do something better. If a teen in Wisconsin (mathematically, the next great young director will come from Wisconsin) sees “Pain & Gain” this weekend and loves it, we’ll never know what he might have accomplished if subjected to “Transformers IV: The Quest for Robot Love.” If there’s no big inefficient spectacle to rail against, there’s no frustration, and no reason for anyone to reach higher. Michael Bay is a living, breathing gift of a motivation for an industry that occasionally lapses into apathy.

Yes, in attempting to subsume lower budget fare, Michael Bay has fired a warning shot over the bow of any who would dare to oppose him. He has access to far more than the $22 million it cost to make “Pain & Gain”, he could fund an army of these sorts of films, and his gain this weekend could lead to much more pain for all of us down the road, when the zombie apocalypse of copy-cat action films swarm the sky, blocking out the sun, a great and terrible financial engine grinding up those who would hope for better.

Laremy wrote the book on film criticism would kill for abs like Mark Wahlberg.

Categories: Features

Tags: Budgets, Mark wahlberg, Michael bay, Pain & Gain, The rock, Transformers

Sabtu, 03 Agustus 2013

‘Oblivion’ Obliterates the Box Office

oblivion-4For movie fans there was pretty much only one game in town this weekend and as a result, it was an easy win for Tom Cruise’s new sci-fi epic “Oblivion,” which earned an estimated $38.2 million to capture the box office crown.

That’s a solid number both for Cruise, who continues to prove his action hero credentials even at age 50, and for director Joseph Kosinski, whose only previous feature film, “TRON: Legacy,” brought in similar numbers ($44 million) over its opening weekend back in 2010.

Of course, “Oblivion” benefited from the fact that there was basically no competition. Fearful of being stomped by the Cruise machine, studios moved their tentpoles to other dates, leaving “Oblivion” as the only wide release of the weekend. But hey, a win by default is still a win, right?

The lack of new releases was also good news for returning films, like last weekend’s champion “42,” which took in a strong $18 million to push its ten day total to $54 million. “The Croods” also hung on to third place in its fifth week of release with $9.5 million, while Bradley Cooper and Ryan Gosling’s broodfest “The Place Beyond the Pines” expanded into wider release, moving into sixth place with $4.7 million.

It will be interesting to see whether next week’s big new release, Mark Wahlberg’s “Pain & Gain,” can knock off “Oblivion.” Either way, though, fans and studios alike seem to just be marking time until the summer really begins with “Iron Man 3? in two weeks.

And that’s totally cool with Tom Cruise.

Here’s a look at this weekend’s full top ten, courtesy of Hollywood.com:

1. “Oblivion” – $38.2m (our review)
2. “42? – $18m (our review)
3. “The Croods” – $9.5m (our review)
4. “Scary Movie 5? – $6.3m (our review)
5. “G.I. Joe: Retaliation” – $5.8m
6. “The Place Beyond the Pines” – $4.7m (our review)
7. “Olympus Has Fallen” – $4.5m (our review)
8. “Evil Dead” – $4.1m (our review)
9. “Jurassic Park 3D” – $4m (our review)
10. “Oz the Great and Powerful” – $3m (our review)

Categories: News

Tags: Box office, Oblivion, Tom cruise

Jumat, 02 Agustus 2013

OUTRAGE BEYOND (2012)

OUTRAGE BEYOND (2012)

Tanggal Rilis : 6 October 2012 (Japan)
Jenis Film : Action | Crime
Diperankan Oleh : Takeshi Kitano, Ryo Kase, Toshiyuki Nishida

Ringkasan Cerita OUTRAGE BEYOND (2012) :

The Sanno crime family has grown into a huge organization, expanding its power into politics and legitimate big business. The Sanno?s upper ranks are now dominated by young executives, and the old-guard members are penting up resentment while being pushed to the sidelines. This vulnerable spot in the Sanno hierachy is exactly what anti-gang detective Kataoka has been looking for, as the police force prepares a full-scale crackdown.

With secret plots and dirty tricks, the ambitious Kataoka instigates confl ict between the Sanno and their long-time ally, the Hanabishi, in the hopes that they ultimately destroy each other. But Kataoka?s trump card is the arranged release from prison of Otomo, the rumoreddead boss of a family once crushed by the Sanno. Otomo?s surprise return adds to the deception and betrayal among the families as everyone watches out for the other?s next move. It?s impossible to guess who will come out on top in this fi erce power game. It?s not over until it?s over.

[IMDb rating : 6.8/10]
[Awards : 2 wins & 4 nominations]
[Production Co : Office Kitano]
[IMDb link : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1724962]

[Quality : HDRip]
[File Size : 450 MB]
[Format : Matroska >> mkv]
[Resolution : 720x304]
[Source : HDRip.H264.AC3-XaW]
[Encoder : nItRo]

BillionUploads
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Megaload
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Uppit
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Zippyshare
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
180upload
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders

Download English Subtitle (Muxed)
Download Indonesian Subtitle (Not available yet)

Watch this Full Movie with High Quality Streaming

Bagi Pengunjung Baru klik di sini Cara Menggabungkan File Ekstensi .001 dan .002


( klik " Like " Dan " +1 " jika kamu suka Film ini )

Kamis, 01 Agustus 2013

Your Daily Short: David Lowery’s ‘Daily Routine’

Welcome to Your Daily Short, a new feature on Film.com that will highlight and stream a short film at high noon. Every weekday. Every week.

TODAY’S SHORT: “My Daily Routine” (David Lowery) 2011

RUNNING TIME: 2:39 

WHY YOU SHOULD WATCH IT: David Lowery’s daily routine is probably going to be changing in the near future now that his “Ain’t Them Bodies Saints” was the talk of Sundance and has been selected to play at Cannes (also, dude has since been selected to write “Pete’s Dragon”), but this oddly calming animated short about the rhythm and flow of his day-to-day life is as charming as it is outdated. Mileage may vary, but I find something rather serene and aspirational in this portrait of an artist who has managed to sustain a life of his own design, one that works for him as much as he works for it.

Oh, and this “editor by trade” recently cut Shane Carruth’s “Upstream Color.” Some folks self-motivate so well it’s disgusting.

Finally, a quick tip o’ the hat to Film School Rejects, who featured this short back in January. I try not to be lazy and just jack their picks, but I could only ignore this one for so long.

Watch the previous Daily Short: “Triumph of a Heart”

Do you have a favorite short film that you would like us to feature as Your Daily Short? Whether it’s something you love, something you made, or both, send it along to Filmdotcomshorts@Gmail.com and you might see it on the site!

Categories: Columns

Tags: Ain’t Them Bodies Saints, Daily Routine, David Lowery, Pete's Dragon, Your Daily Short

Selasa, 30 Juli 2013

THE LAST STAND (2013)

THE LAST STAND (2013)

Tanggal Rilis : 18 January 2013 (USA)
Jenis Film : Action | Crime | Thriller
Diperankan Oleh : Arnold Schwarzenegger, Forest Whitaker, Johnny Knoxville

Ringkasan Cerita THE LAST STAND (2013) :

Sheriff Owens is a man who has resigned himself to a life of fighting what little crime takes place in sleepy border town Sommerton Junction after leaving his LAPD post following a bungled operation that left him wracked with failure and defeat after his partner was crippled. After a spectacular escape from an FBI prisoner convoy, the most notorious, wanted drug kingpin in the hemisphere is hurtling toward the border at 200 mph in a specially outfitted car with a hostage and a fierce army of gang members.

He is headed, it turns out, straight for Summerton Junction, where the whole of U.S. law enforcement will have their last opportunity to make a stand and intercept him before he slips across the border forever. At first reluctant to become involved, and then counted out because of the perceived ineptitude of his small town force, Owens ultimately accepts responsibility for the face off.

[IMDb rating : 6.9/10]
[Awards : 2 nominations]
[Production Co : Di Bonaventura Pictures]
[IMDb link : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1549920]

[Quality : HDRip | BRRip 720p]
[File Size : 450 MB | 650 MB]
[Format : Matroska >> mkv]
[Resolution : 720x304 | 1280x536]
[Source : HDRip.XviD-Lum1x | 720p.BluRay.x264-DAA]
[Encoder : nItRo]

BillionUploads HDRip
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Megaload HDRip
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Uppit HDRip
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Zippyshare HDRip
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
180upload HDRip
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Billionuploads BRRip 720p
BillionUploads
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Megaload BRRip 720p
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Uppit BRRip 720p
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Zippyshare BRRip 720p
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
180upload BRRip 720p
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders

Download English Subtitle
Download Indonesian Subtitle

Watch this Full Movie with High Quality Streaming

Bagi Pengunjung Baru klik di sini Cara Menggabungkan File Ekstensi .001 dan .002


( klik " Like " Dan " +1 " jika kamu suka Film ini )

Senin, 29 Juli 2013

Spoiler Alert: Critics Shouldn’t Care About ‘Ruining’ a Movie

13

Late last week, a few hours before the American embargo on “Oblivion” reviews lifted, Universal’s publicity department forwarded critics and journalists the following polite recommendation:

“During the course of your reviewing or reporting, we request that you not reveal plot points toward the film’s climax and conclusion so that those surprises are retained for the audience.”

At first glance this would appear to be a reasonable request: the film, after all, opens in wide release imminently, and, because its narrative is uncommonly laden with sudden twists and turnabouts, it’s likely to play better to a first-time audience if they can retain the sensation of surprise. There’s a reason we call revelations of important plot points “spoilers”: there’s a shared sense that knowing this information in advance of seeing a film will somehow spoil the experience of watching it. We tend to think of movie spoilers the same way we think of, say, hearing the final score to a football game we recorded but haven’t watched, which is to say we strain to avoid them while we can and feel deflated if we find we cannot.

Part of the problem with Universal’s request is that it betrays a certain anxiety toward the buying power of intrigue. It’s nice to think that a studio has only the moviegoing pleasure of its target demographic in mind when it urges critics to forgo spoilers, but I suspect it’s more likely that, at the end of the day, Universal is more concerned about dissuading prospective ticket-buyers than it is with preserving the artistic integrity of “Oblivion” and its myriad twists. If the appeal of “Oblivion”, at least from the perspective of a potential audience member being lured to the theater by marketing, is the mystery at the heart of the story, it stands to reason that knowing the answer to the mystery in advance—and maybe even being disappointed or put off by that answer—will be enough to keep the now-sated audience member at home. This isn’t a guarantee, mind you; knowing, for instance, that Bruce Willis was dead along (spoiler alert) might not be enough to deter people from rushing out to catch “The Sixth Sense”. But “The Village” might seem less attractive if an opening-day review lets slip the fact that it all takes place in the modern day (oh, um, also spoiler alert).

211133_original

In other words, when a critic elides spoilers simply because a movie studio demands it, a critic is helping the studio more than the audience—and doubly so in the case of bad movies, which don’t have as much to fall back on once their secrets have been spilled. Only the thinnest and cheapest films can be truly spoiled by knowing their twists ahead of time, which is why, for instance, “Citizen Kane” seems no less great if one knows that “Rosebud” is the name of a sled. The kind of pleasure offered by plot twists are by nature superficial: it’s a momentary feeling of surprise and perhaps astonishment, a quick gasp that hardly lingers after the end credits role. It’s a nice feeling, one that we hope is preserved but not needlessly prioritized.

Also check out: Our (spoiler-free!) review of “Oblivion”

Preserving the surprise isn’t necessarily a problem for broadsheet journalists authoring quick-hit capsules as a kind of consumer guide for what to see over the weekend, since this sort of thumbs-up/thumbs-down reviewing wouldn’t benefit from drifting into spoiler territory in most cases. But being thoroughly averse to spoilers on principle does present problems for long-form film criticism, which by its very nature demands full disclosure and the ability to engage seriously with every aspect of a film, including major plot points and, indeed, even the ending. Film criticism is supposed to help illuminate a film, not simply offer a yay/nay declaration of its quality, and in order to do so well it needs to assume that its readers will be familiar with the material in question in full.

This, of course, raises an important point that typically goes unmentioned: film criticism is intended to be read by people who have seen the film under discussion. That isn’t a hard rule, mind you—people are free to read whatever they’d like, and if someone finds reading about a film in advance of seeing it helpful or even just interesting, so be it—but it should at least be an assumed truth of the practice, which would allow critics to tailor their writing to a knowledgeable audience and allow readers to be aware of what they’re getting into in advance. It would also almost single-handedly obliterate concerns about spoilers in criticism—concerns which, frankly, are altogether unfounded.

citizenkane2-1bf6af94bb91d835e74468599ba20c3cde710b98-s6-c10

Consider the real issue here: if you haven’t seen a film and you are concerned about spoilers, the onus is on you to not read reviews before seeing the film. It’s not only unfair to demand that critics pander to people who shouldn’t be reading their work yet in the first place, it’s absurd; it presumes that a critic should be talking around a film instead of talking about it, and it makes the practice of criticism useless except as a vehicle of undescriptive opinion. While a spoiler warning is an easy courtesy for those readers who enjoy tempting fate, the responsibility remains their own (this, of course, applies only to articles with which a reader has voluntarily engaged, and not a tweet that appears from the blue like a broadside attack).

If you spent any time last week reading reviews of “Oblivion” without having seen it, you should ask yourself an obvious question: what exactly were you hoping to find in those reviews? If you wanted nothing more than a sense of the quality of the film, reading an 800-word essay is probably unnecessary. Review aggregators like Rotten Tomatoes and MetaCritic exist, in part, to offer a fleeting summation of professional opinion, a quick measure of a film’s critical temperature that gives a clear (if imperfect) indication of whether a given film is worth your time and money. While those aggregators catch a lot of flack from film critics, it’s crucial to reckon with how they empower us to speak to our audience as though they’re looking for insight rather than broad opinion. Reading more ought to come after the fact: the criticism is there to help you make sense of what you saw, to offer validating or challenging opinions, to make you think about the film differently or better. “Spoiling” the plot should be irrelevant.

Categories: Features

Tags: Citizen kane, Oblivion, Op-ed, Spoilers

Minggu, 28 Juli 2013

Your Daily Short: Michael Cera’s ‘Brazzaville Teen-Ager’

Welcome to Your Daily Short, a new feature on Film.com that will highlight and stream a short film at high noon. Every weekday. Every week.

TODAY’S SHORT: “Brazzaville Teen-Ager” (Michael Cera) 2013

RUNNING TIME: 19:33

WHY YOU SHOULD WATCH IT: A dramatic comedy about a kid named Gunther (Cera) who tries to connect to his dying father by convincing his boss to sing the background vocals on a new Kelis track (for a short film, it’s a long story), “Brazzaville Teen-Ager” is a strange but compulsively watchable new episode in the working life of Michael Cera, dropping on the actor’s YouTube channel yesterday and anticipating his transition into more serious roles (he starred in two deeply dark Sundance films earlier this year). Obviously based on a short story (it has that certain tone) and droll to the end, Cera’s short – which is too satisfying to feel like a put-on, suggests that the kid has reservoirs of unknown talent

Watch the previous Daily Short: “Daily Routine”

Do you have a favorite short film that you would like us to feature as Your Daily Short? Whether it’s something you love, something you made, or both, send it along to Filmdotcomshorts@Gmail.com and you might see it on the site!

Categories: Columns

Tags: Brazzaville Teen-Agers, Michael cera, Short Film, Your Daily Short

Jumat, 26 Juli 2013

THE COMPANY YOU KEEP (2012)

THE COMPANY YOU KEEP (2012)

Tanggal Rilis : 20 December 2012 (Italy)
Jenis Film : Thriller
Diperankan Oleh : Robert Redford, Nick Nolte, Stanley Tucci

Ringkasan Cerita THE COMPANY YOU KEEP (2012) :

Working from a script by Lem Dobbs, Robert Redford directs and stars in The Company You Keep as Jim Grant, a former member of the Weather Underground who has been hiding out under an assumed identity ever since members of the group participated in a bank heist that ended in a guard’s death. When a young reporter figures out the truth, Grant must stay one step ahead of the FBI, who want to bring charges against him for the decades-old murder. The Company You Keep screened at the 2012 Toronto International Film Festival.

[IMDb rating : 6.2/10]
[Awards : 2 wins]
[Production Co : Voltage Pictures, Wildwood Enterprises, Brightlight Pictures]
[IMDb link : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1381404]

[Quality : DVDRip | BRRip 720p]
[File Size : 475 MB | 750 MB]
[Format : Matroska >> mkv]
[Resolution : 720x304 | 1280x534]
[Source : DVDRip XVID AC3-CM8 | 720p.BluRay.DTS.x264-PHD]
[Encoder : nItRo]

BillionUploads DVDRip
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Megafiles.se DVDRip
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Megaload DVDRip
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Zippyshare DVDRip
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
180upload DVDRip
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Billionuploads BRRip 720p
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Megaload BRRip 720p
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Uppit BRRip 720p
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Zippyshare BRRip 720p
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
180upload
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders

Download English Subtitle (Not available yet)
Download Indonesian Subtitle (Not available yet)

Watch this Full Movie with High Quality Streaming

Bagi Pengunjung Baru klik di sini Cara Menggabungkan File Ekstensi .001 dan .002


( klik " Like " Dan " +1 " jika kamu suka Film ini )

Rabu, 24 Juli 2013

THE PURSUIT OF HAPPYNESS (2006)

THE PURSUIT OF HAPPYNESS (2006)

Tanggal Rilis : 15 December 2006 (USA)
Jenis Film : Biography | Drama
Diperankan Oleh : Will Smith, Thandie Newton and Jaden Smith

Ringkasan Cerita THE PURSUIT OF HAPPYNESS (2006) :

Film yang disadur dari sebuah kisah nyata ini bercerita tentang seorang pria bernama Chris Gardner (Will Smith), yang sangat pintar dan berbakat. Sayangnya dia tidak mendapatkan pekerjaan sesuai talentanya. Dia hanya bekerja sebagai seorang penjual dengan jam kerja paruh waktu, padahal dia harus menghidupi keluarganya.

Chris tetap gigih bekerja walaupun semua itu tidak bisa mencukupi kehidupan material mereka. Namun, lama-kelamaan istrinya (Thandie Newton) tidak lagi kuat untuk hidup dibawah tekanan seperti itu. Dia lantas meninggalkan Chris dan putra semata wayang mereka, yang masih berusia lima tahun, Christopher (Jaden Smith).

Kini, Chris hidup sebagai orangtua tunggal. Dia tetap berusaha mencari pekerjaan lebih baik dengan bakat yang ia miliki. Akhirnya dia mendapatkan sebuah pekerjaan di sebuah firma broker yang bonafit, sayangnya disana dia tidak digaji. Tapi, ia tetap gigih mengerjakan semua pekerjaannya, dengan harapan setelah program yang dia laksanakan selesai, dia akan mendapatkan pekerjaan lain yang lebih baik dan masa depan yang lebih terjamin.

Sebelum cita-citanya tercapai, Chris dan Christopher menghadapi masalah lain dalam hidup mereka. Hal terburuk muncul saat mereka diusir dari apartemen yang selama ini mereka tempati karena tidak bisa membayar uang sewa. Mereka harus berjuang untuk hidup di tempat pengungsian, terminal bis, kamar mandi, atau tempat lainnya yang mereka temui di malam hari.

Meski hidup mereka semakin sulit, Chris tetap berpegang teguh pada pendiriannya untuk menjadi ayah yang penyayang untuk anaknya. Berbekal kasih sayang dan rasa percaya dari Christopher, dia merasa lebih kuat dan mampu menghadapi segala rintangan yang ada.

[IMDb rating : 7.8/10]
[Awards : Nominated for Oscar. Another 11 wins & 18 nominations]
[Production Co : Columbia Pictures Corporation, Relativity Media, Overbrook Entertainment]
[IMDb link : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0454921]

[Quality : BRRip 720p]
[File Size : 700 MB]
[Format : Matroska >> mkv]
[Resolution : 1280x528]
[Source : 720p.BluRay]

Fileswap
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 |
Extract with winrar
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Zippyshare
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 |
Extract with winrar
Credit to original uploaders

Download English Subtitle
Download Indonesian Subtitle

Bagi Pengunjung Baru klik di sini Cara Menggabungkan File Ekstensi .001 dan .002


( klik " Like " Dan " +1 " jika kamu suka Film ini )

Selasa, 23 Juli 2013

Don’t Fear the Reaper: Why Horror Films Love Pop Music

LordsofSalemThe-30-cd04ea3e15591c081be301a95a537f82

In Rob Zombie’s newest film, “The Lords Of Salem,” vinyl brings evil into the world.

The title refers to a witches’ coven that was burned alive during the town’s famed witch trials by a preacher incensed by all aspects of their dark magick, including their “blasphemous music.” Appropriately, the witches choose to announce their return by mailing an LP to a radio station. The song itself (co-composed by Zombie’s bandmate John 5 and Griffin Boice) isn’t too captivating — grindingly repetitive rock with just three grudging bass notes instead of the usual minimum three cords. The equally abrasive vocals signal the return of Satanic witches and bad news all round.

Zombie’s soundtrack lavishes the most attention on the Velvet Underground. Early on, heroine Heidi Hawthorne (Sheri Moon Zombie) dances in her apartment after work with radio co-host Whitey (Jeff Daniel Phillips) to “Venus In Furs,” turning a song about “shiny whips and leather” into an excuse to prance around waving scarves. That’s just a teaser for the climax, a full-on mass Satanic ritual with the main female sacrifice offered up to the VU’s “All Tomorrow’s Parties.” Avoiding spoilers for a film not yet opened, the lyrics take on a grimly ironic, black comic aspect in this final context. Said Zombie during an interview at SXSW: “I always like to find songs that can represent the film, so there’s at least one song in every movie that when you hear it, it brings back the imagery of the film.” (The most memorable example is the climax of “The Devil’s Rejects,” set to “Freebird”; the first time I saw it, the crowd went nuts watching anti-heroes gunned down in slow-motion to the song.) “Sometimes you just hear a song and you go, ‘This song sounds like how I want the movie to feel.’”

Zombie was a musician before he eased into directing, and his attention to soundtrack choices can be accordingly meticulous beyond the norm (he co-produced an entire fake country greatest-hits collection by “Banjo & Sullivan” for “The Devil’s Rejects”). His songs are used for ironic purposes or to heighten lurid emotions, one of many ways a horror film can use a pre-existing tune. All movies have editorial rhythm, of course, but this genre’s especially reliant on precise attention to cutting: the longer a shot during a tense sequence, the greater possibility it’ll end with a) something horrible coming at us from the left, right or back of the frame with no warning b) a sudden cut to something horrible happening.

Songs serve as a sonic safety buffer that could be punctuated by sudden noise at any moment. Indeed, the tension between the ostensible security of pop music and the underlying terror implicit to scary movies is so rich and immediate that it’s even come to influence the trailers for horror films (i.e. this great preview for ”You’re Next”).

Here’s a look at how five different horror films used pop music to deepen their dread.

Blue Öyster Cult, “Don’t Fear The Reaper” from “Halloween,” 1978

“Halloween” didn’t invent the unseen-/masked-man-kills-people slasher formula, but it codified the genre’s structure and look, including one possible use for pre-established pop songs. 40 minutes in, Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis) is in the passenger seat when friend Annie (Nancy Kyes) pulls out a joint. Behind them, a car emerges — driven by the unseen Michael Myers — but Laurie and Annie don’t notice the vehicle ominously tracking them. The radio’s trying to warn them via Blue Öyster Cult’s “Don’t Fear The Reaper” that they should very much be afraid of imminent death, but they don’t pick up on the threat. The scene ends without incident, though Annie will later meet her gruesome end in the same vehicle (on the way to pick up a boy, naturally).

Stevie Wonder, “Superstition” from “The Thing,” 1982

Director John Carpenter composed the score for “Halloween,” and the theme’s ubiquitously recognized still. His 1982 “The Thing” features another deathless sound of the ’70s-and-onwards, the 100-million-plus-units selling Stevie Wonder. The tune is 1972's “Superstition,” listened to by the cook in the kitchen. “Will you turn that crap down?” a cranky Arctic base resident yells over the intercom. “I’m trying to get some sleep. I was shot today.” “Will do,” says the cook and cranks it up. (Wonder was a racial radio uniter, but the fact that a white man’s yelling at a black guy who’s asserting his independence through volume doesn’t seem incidental.) The camera moves from the kitchen to an empty room, the song’s heavy irony inviting us to realize that the crew’s fears aren’t based in irrational superstition but on a real threat, ending with a dog being lured into a room where The Thing lurks in shadow. Picture fades to black, sound to nothingness, the scene’s potential scare realized only in the static shadow’s head abruptly turning; the audience, suitably keyed up, will have to squirm longer before the first Big Jolt.

Nick Cave, “Red Right Hand” from “Scream,” 1996

Remixed for “Scream 2? and re-recorded by Cave himself for “Scream 3,” “Red Right Hand” is the series’ unofficial theme song. Its first appearance in the initial installment leaves a strong impression, even though it plays for barely a minute. Woodsboro’s under curfew to foil the Ghostface killer as Cave rumbles “You’ll see him in your nightmares/You’ll see him in your dreams,” linking Ghostface with director Wes Craven’s earlier “A Nightmare On Elm Street.” parents bustle their children along sideways, people grab their last brews from closing coffee shops, and the streets are deserted. The ominous music deflates the series’ constant wit and cleverness, a brief injection of unmediated menace.

Joanna Newsom, “The Sprout And The Bean” from “The Strangers” (2008)
One of the odder and certainly less populist horror music cues, Joanna Newsom’s “The Sprout And The Bean” nonetheless serves a textbook literal-minded function in this relentless slasher film. “Should we go outside?” Newsom asks as Liv Tyler sulks alone in her isolated house, her decidedly acquired taste vocals hovering over harp and strings. The obvious answer to even inexperienced horror viewers is “NO,” but Tyler answers the door anyway when someone asks “Is Tamara here?” The record player (vinyl again!) will recur throughout, its sudden bursts into sound not cued by Tyler or luckless boyfriend Scott Speedman signaling another imminent burst of homicidal mayhem.

The Fixx, “One Thing Leads To Another” from “The House Of The Devil” (2009)

Unlike the other songs on this list, the lyrics of The Fixx’s “One Thing Leads To Another” have no bearing on the scene it’s heard in. Two things matter here: Samantha Hughes (Jocelin Donahue) is listening to the song on her Walkman (an outdated, nostalgically regarded object from the movie’s vague early ’80s setting, just like the tune itself), and she’s got her headphones on while bouncing around a big, creepy house. The audio goes from just-song-with-no-ambient-context to a tinnier version heard from Samantha’s headphones in different rooms. Every time The Fixx become just part of the overall soundscape, we’re aware that something loud and homicidal could (and inevitably must) burst onto the screen, but it never does, not this early. Samantha dances on, oblivious to all menace.

Categories: Lists

Tags: Halloween, Horror films, Joanna newsom, Lords of Salem, Music, Rob zombie, Scream, The Strangers

Minggu, 21 Juli 2013

Your Daily Short: Spike Jonze’s ‘Triumph of a Heart’

Welcome to Your Daily Short, a new feature on Film.com that will highlight and stream a short film at high noon. Every weekday. Every week.

TODAY’S SHORT: “Triumph of a Heart” (Spike Jonze) 2004

RUNNING TIME: 5:26

WHY YOU SHOULD WATCH IT: Okay, yes, you got me – this is a music video. Sure, it’s one of the most amazing music videos ever made, pairing two titanically talented artists at the height of their talents, but it’s a music video. Be that as it may, one of my hopes with this feature is express just how boundless the world of short-form filmmaking is (so long as it’s allowed to be), and ghettoizing the music video as a viable artistic form needlessly forces us to overlook incidents of great cinema.

As any Björk fan would be happy to tell you, the music videos she’s commissioned over the course of her career – from Michel Gondry’s video for “Bachelorette” to Chris Cunningham’s visualization of “All is Full of Love” – are consistently superior works of film art, as innovative and involving as any of the feature films that came out in their respective years. The Icelandic swan-stress has teamed up with Spike Jonze a number of different times (most famously for “It’s Oh So Quiet”), but their adorably demented video for “Triumph of a Heart” is probably my personal favorite, and also one of the few Björk videos that can claim to have a rather linear narrative.

Björk plays a woman whose marriage is in a little bit of a rut. Desperate to reassess her relationship, she runs away and joins her friends for a wild bender while her husband waits for her to come back to him. Also, her husband is a cat. And also maybe a shapeshifter. And definitely a sweet dancer.

Watch Yesterday’s Daily Short: “14e Arrondissement”

Do you have a favorite short film that you would like us to feature as Your Daily Short? Whether it’s something you love, something you made, or both, send it along to Filmdotcomshorts@Gmail.com and you might see it on the site!

Categories: Columns

Tags: Bjork, Music Video, Short Film, Spike jonze, Triumph of a Heart

Sabtu, 20 Juli 2013

The 2013 Tribeca Film Festival: Our 20 Most Anticipated Films


news_37500_tribeca-film-festival

The 11th annual Tribeca Film Festival kicks off this evening, bringing more than 150 films from every corner of the globe to downtown Manhattan over the course of the next 11 days. Launched by Robert De Niro (and pals) in order to help revitalize New York City in the wake of 9/11, the Tribeca Film Festival has since struggled to maintain an identity as we’ve moved forward from the tragedy that initially provided its purpose. A massive cornucopia of movies large and small that isn’t curated so much as it’s contained, TFF seemed to think that a festival could be as big as its wallet, ignoring the fact that these things take years to cultivate. A heavy corporate presence and a notoriously substandard lineup have hindered the fest from becoming an invaluable event on the cinematic calendar – it’s as expansive as the Toronto International Film Festival, with just as much to watch but precious little worth seeing.

Be that as it may, the folks behind the festival have remained admirably determined to make it a true New York City institution. It’s hard to pinpoint exactly when things began to change, but most repeat attendees would agree that TFF recently turned a corner. With every passing year, TFF is more seamlessly woven into the fabric of this city, and with every passing year it becomes more of a viable place from which to launch a major film (it helps that Tribeca Film has become a serious player in the industry, and that fest premieres like “War Witch” have earned meaningful acclaim). In 11 short years, TFF has evolved from a statement to a joke to an increasingly indispensable event, and the apparent strength of this year’s (remarkably diverse) lineup suggests that things are only getting better.

Still, with approximately three billion movies playing in the next 11 days, it can be tough to know what to see. So, after scouring the line-up and hearing as many informed opinions as possible, I present to you Film.com’s 20 Most Anticipated Films of the 2013 Tribeca Film Festival. It’s gonna be a good one.

ALMOST CHRISTMAS (Spotlight)
Directed by Phil Morrison

almost_christmas_1_pubs

Historically, it’s not always the best sign when a movie loaded with familiar faces makes its world premiere at Tribeca, the conventional wisdom suggesting that both Sundance and SXSW have passed on the chance to debut it. Nevertheless, as TFF continues to grow in esteem and proves itself as a capable launching ground for major works (“War Witch” comes to mind), the alarm bulls are growing quieter. As far as “Almost Christmas” is concerned, such fears are allayed even further by the fact that director Phil Morrison was responsible for the wise indie charmer “Junebug.”

“Almost Christmas’ tells the story of two heavily bearded French Canadian schemers (Paul Rudd as Rene and Paul Giamatti as Dennis) who travel to New York City with a surefire plan to get rich by selling Christmas trees. Complicating matters is the fact that Rene recently stole Dennis’ wife (played by the indomitable Sally Hawkins). A brittle buddy comedy with a compulsively watchable cast, “Almost Christmas” should enjoy wide exposure so long as it’s even moderately entertaining.

ADULT WORLD (Spotlight)
Directed by Scott Coffey

adult-world-stilljpg-a46884ed13dab8af

You had me at “Emma Roberts is an aspiring poet who gets a part-time job working at a sex shop.” A world premiere from polymath Scott Coffey (who played Wilkins in “Mulholland Dr.” and made his directorial debut with “Ellie Parker” back in 2005), “Adult World” seems like a sly black comedy that could definitely find an audience, particularly with John Cusack finally having some fun, again, here playing a reclusive writer for whom Roberts is hoping to intern.

BEFORE MIDNIGHT (Spotlight)
Directed by Richard Linklater

Before_Midnight_First_Image

This might be a bit of a cheat (I’ve already seen it twice), but I’m more excited to revisit the third chapter of the cinema’s greatest evolving romance than I am to see almost any other film at the fest for the first time. I’ve been almost pathologically militant about people revealing any details about the film’s plot or the circumstances in which it unfolds, but I’m convinced that “Before Midnight” is Richard Linklater’s masterpiece, a genuinely perfect thing that stands toe-to-toe with the likes of “Certified Copy” and “Journey to Italy.” As excited as I am for additional opportunities to see the movie, I’m even more jazzed about the Tribeca Talk that the festival is hosting on April 22, during which Linklater will moderate a panel with collaborators Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy.

BEFORE SNOWFALL (World Narrative Competition)
Directed by Hisham Zaman

Gutt m gevær www_0

A Kurdish film by way of Germany, Norway and Iraq, Hisham Zaman’s “Before Snowfall” is a severe drama that examines the the moral crises involved in the practice of honor killings. Beginning in Kurdistan, where a young boy watches his older sister abscond from an arranged marriage, and heading towards Istanbul, where the boy is forced to make amends for his sibling’s perceived slight, “Before Snowfall” is a portrait of a life-defining tradition as it’s stretched across borders and generations.

Variety’s review wasn’t especially kind, but the unfortunately urgent subject matter should warrant a look.

BIG MEN (Documentary Competition)
Directed by Rachel Boynton

large_BigMen_1_PUBS

“Our Brand is Crisis” established Rachel Boynton as one of the world’s foremost cinematic muckrakers, and her raised profile has allowed her access to stories that might otherwise be impossible for her to capture on camera. Leveraging her past success, Boynton’s new film (which is enjoying its world premiere at Tribeca) lifts the lid on the massive oil companies that fuel Africa, investigating the greed that drives their profits and the extensive toll that it has levied against the continent and its people.

Executive produced by Brad Pitt, “Big Men” could be one of the documentaries that we’re talking about for the rest of the year.

THE BROKEN CIRCLE BREAKDOWN (Narrative Competition)
Directed by Felix van Groeningen

the-broken-circle-breakdown

Felix van Groeningen’s “The Misfortunates” premiered to rave reviews in Cannes at 2009, but unfortunately it never picked up much traction on these shores, and remains a woefully under-seen gem. Now, van Groeningen returns to prove once again that the Dardenne brothers aren’t the final word in Belgian cinema, “The Broken Circle Breakdown” offering a foot-stomping blast of raw heartbreak.

After receiving strong reviews from the Berlin Film Festival, this hip contemporary story of a musician and a tattoo artist trying to save their faltering marriage comes to Tribeca with a sizable head of steam (I’m tempted to think of it as “Bluegrass Valentine”). Allegedly broad, effective and enjoyable from start to finish, “The Broken Circle Breakdown” could be one of the festival’s breakout hits.

A CASE OF YOU (Spotlight)
Directed by Kat Coiro

a_case_of_you_art

The multitalented Kat Coiro was at Tribeca last year with her sensuously sad monochromatic drama “While We Were Here,” which is still awaiting the attention she deserves. Apparently not one to rest on her laurels, Coiro is already back with her third feature, “A Case of You,” a romantic comedy about a writer (Justin Long) who tries to woo the barista of his dreams (Evan Rachel Wood) by creating a fake social media profile (in other words, he Catfishes her?). Boasting a mess of cameos from the likes of Peter Dinklage and Sam Rockwell, “A Case of You” has as much breakout potential as any film at the festival, and the early buzz is trending towards the positive.

CUTIE AND THE BOXER (Viewpoints)
Directed by Zachary Heinzerling

CUTIE_Ushio_Shinohara_boxing_painting

A unique portrait of the modern muse (to say the least) and the extent to which a relationship between artists is always subservient to the art it inspires, “Cutie and the Boxer” is a candid documentary about 80-year-old “boxing” painter Ushio Shinohara, who the film finds hoping to reclaim the zeitgeist with his latest exhibition. Ushio’s long-suffering wife Noriko is not only his reluctant assistant, but also his inspiration, their marriage completely dominated by the massive paintings that distill and preserve its beauty.

Early reports indicate that Zachary Heinzerling’s first feature-length film is one of the fest’s best.

THE ENGLISH TEACHER (Spotlight)
Directed by Craig Zisk

download (6)

Judging by his IMDB page, Craig Zisk has directed an episode of every TV in the history of TV shows (give or take). Most importantly, he recently stepped behind the camera for an episode of “New Girl,” which – as far as I’m concerned – makes him one of the most important artists currently living. His debut feature certainly has a pedigree worthy of its experience, as it stars Julianne Moore as the eponymous educator whose dull life is ruffled by the return of a former student and his deadbeat dad.

Billed as “an insightful comedy about self-discovery,” “The English Teacher” also reunites “Mirror Mirror” co-stars Nathan Lane and Lily Collins. On a slightly more troubling note, the film also stars the Kiss of Death himself, Greg Kinnear. However it turned out, “The English Teacher” is already available to rent on iTunes, so feel free to see for yourself whether or not the film deserves a pass.

HAUTE CUISINE (Spotlight)
Directed by Christian Vincent

1763_haute-cuisine-640

A bon mot for foodies, Christian Vincent’s “Haute Cuisine” premiered to rather tasty (ohmygodhedidnot) reviews at last year’s Venice Film Festival. Based on a true story, “Haute Cuisine” is a warm and effervescent comedy about the cook (Catherine Frot) who was plucked from obscurity and hand-picked to work as the personal chef for French president François Mitterrand (who served from 1981-1995). Reportedly a parade of mouth-watering dishes the likes of which the movies haven’t seen since “Big Night” or “Babette’s Feast” before that, Vincent’s film strikes me like the kind of film that could earn major traction with niche audiences. The Weinstein Company seems to agree, as they’ve picked it up for a release later this year.

READ OUR NEXT 10 PICKS ON PAGE 2!

Categories: No Categories

Tags: 2013 Tribeca Film Festival, Before Midnight, Emma roberts, Julianne moore, Julie Delpy, Justin long, Paul giamatti, Paul rudd, Preview, Richard linklater, Some Velvet Morning, Tribeca film festival