Sabtu, 28 September 2013

Trailer Showdown: Rory Gilmore Reigns Supreme in the Week’s Best New Trailer

Violet-_-Daisy_Still-4

If it’s Friday, which it is, then that can mean only one thing: Trailer Showdown! Every week, we rank the week’s trailer from best to worst, helping you to plan what movies you definitely need to see and which you can skip without a hint of remorse.

A great week for the quirky independent films about people who eat ice cream, teenage assassins and road workers, as well as for the big, brawny blockbuster types with huge names, huge budgets and huge stakes like saving the world. Also in the mix are two stark, dark horror films that explore the depths of human perversion and a lonely weekend. Whatever you’ve got a hankering for, we’ve got a movie for you.

This week was a toughie, as there was no out-right duds, just some real fantastic movies and a few slightly less fantastic ones. But enough with the jibber jabber, let’s get right into the rankings:

1.) ‘Violet and Daisy’

Best of the Week: Teenage assassins? Rory Gilmore in a movie? An original film with a bizarre premise that isn’t cut and dried? I will take two, please. The film revolves around a pair of friends who are also assassins, worrying about the legitimacy of their latest mark. Is the job just a frame up? A test? Can they survive intact? This trailer makes it look kind of terrible, but I believe in the premise of the film and just how strange and wonderful it seems.
Starring: Saoirse Ronan, Alexis Bledel, Tatiana Maslany
Release Date: June 7, 2013

2.) ‘White House Down’

While on a tour of the White House, a policeman must work hard to save his daughter and others from a group of paramilitary soldiers seeking to overthrow the government. I know everyone is making the obvious joke, but… didn’t we just see this movie, starring Gerard Butler? Yes, “Olympus Has Fallen” is very similar but lacks one essential component: Channing Tatum. This movie, released any other time, might be awesome in its own right, so let’s hope it’s actually is as awesome as it looks.
Starring: Channing Tatum, Jamie Foxx, Maggie Gyllenhaal
Release Date: June 28, 2013

3.) ‘Red 2'

Sequels aren’t supposed to look good. Sequels aren’t supposed to look good. Repeat this to yourself the entire time this awesome kick ass trailer is playing. Ex-CIA agent Frank Moses finds a very good reason to get old operative team back together. Even more enticing is Catherine Zeta Jones as a sexy cohort, and of course I’m sure we’ll see Helen Mirren in a bathing suit as that seems to be written into her contract. Filled with action, violence and hilarity, “Red 2? is quickly adding the must-see list.
Starring: Bruce Willis, Anthony Hopkins, John Malkovich
Release Date: July 19, 2013

4.) ‘Prince Avalanche’

The latest from director and writer David Gordon Green is strange, hilarious-looking and stars Paul Rudd and Emile Hirsch. What more could you want? The pair play eccentric road workers during the summer of ’88 who grapple with each other’s oddities and making it through the summer. Weird concept, strange characters and impeccable period appropriate setting make me hopeful for a return to the David Gordon Green of yesteryear.
Starring:
Release Date: August 9, 2013

5.) ‘The History of Future Folk’

An indie film with a unique premise? Sign me up. This movie purports to be the only folk music centric space sci-fi comedy action romance. Finally! A movie that hits every genre! This simple story of a pair of humanoid aliens who were intent on destroying Earth until they heard our music, and subsequently formed a folk band, is silly and sweet. While it may not be a big budget blockbuster, there’s something intriguing and endearing about the premise and execution.
Starring: Nils d’Aulaire, Jay Klaitz, Julie Ann Emery
Release Date: May 31, 2013

6.) ‘Mr. Pip’

In war torn Papua New Guinea, one man seeks to inspire his students with the Dickens novel “Great Expectations”. Little does he know how much of an impact the book will have, inspiring a young girl but potentially making life much harder for everyone around them. This movie looks too saaaaad! Hugh Laurie is gruff but likable as usual, but the story is heartbreaking and based on an award winning novel. Let’s hope there’s a happy ending.
Starring: Hugh Laurie, Kerry Fox, Eka Darville
Release Date: 2013

7.) ‘In Fear’

Beautiful, strange, flickering images of a girl and a boy on a fun weekend gone horribly wrong. This Sundance Film Festival selected horror film gives away very little in the trailer, instead focusing on the look and dark feel of the film. Like a bad dream in the best possible way.
Starring: Iain De Caestecker, Alice Englert, Allen Leech
Release Date: August 23, 2013

8.) ‘Free Samples’

Quirky little indie romantic comedy that puts a hard drinking, beautiful girl in an ice cream truck and sees what happens from there. Romantic entanglements, finding a sense of purpose, and figuring out what life is all about collide in this one. One can only hope it’s not as precious and self-satisfied as it looks, although the fact that it takes place in an ice cream truck isn’t doing it any favors.
Starring: Jess Weixler, Jesse Eisenberg, Jason Ritter
Release Date: 2013

9.) ‘Aftershock’

Worst of the Bunch:
NSFW: A group of friends visiting a Chilean exotic nightclub are forced into survival mode once a massive earthquake hits the area, but things can only go from bad to worse when a gang of prisoners finds their way out into the general populace. Kind of like a wilder, raunchier “The Hangover” gone wrong, and starring horror wunderkid Eli Roth, this one looks to be a mixture of gross out special effects (People getting crushed! Hands getting sliced off!) and good old fashioned suspenseful dread.
Starring: Eli Roth, Andrea Osvárt, Ariel Levy
Release Date: May 10, 2013

Come back next week for more rankings!

Categories: Columns, Trailer Roundup

Tags: Aftershock, Alexis bledel, Prince Avalanche, Trailer showdown, Violet and Daisy, White House Down

Jumat, 27 September 2013

Tribeca Interview: Matt Creed & Amy Grantham (‘Lily’)

large_lily_pubs

So I’ve been pretty outspoken about the fact that, of the approximately six bazillion films premiering at this year’s Tribeca Film Festival, my personal favorite is Matt Creed and Amy Grantham’s “Lily.” Because I’m super lazy and exhausted on account of not sleeping through nearly as many films as I have in years past, I’ll just re-post what I wrote about “Lily” yesterday when Film.com ran an exclusive clip from the movie:

“Lily” is a beautifully rendered portrait of a young woman preparing to take the next step as she finishes treatment for breast cancer, a film that’s tiny but true, as precise as it is universally relatable. Indebted to the free-flowing spirit of John Cassavetes and inspired by lead actress Amy Grantham’s fight with cancer, “Lily” is the kind of movie that proves – among other things – that there’s hope for indie film beyond the likes of Sundance and SXSW, and that Tribeca is full of buried treasure if you know where to look.

Couldn’t have said it better myself. Yesterday, Matt and Amy were kind enough to sit down with me and chat about “Lily,” all of the choices that made the film possible, how such a personal story can be so universally relatable, and how a blog can save a life.

David Ehrlich: So this is a pretty unusual situation for me because I know nothing about you guys other than the movie, which is not typically how I go into these things, so if I ask you some super asinine questions… well, sorry about that.

Matt Creed: No you’re good.

Amy Grantham: (laughs) it’s okay.

David: So this is your first feature?

Matt: Yeah.

David: Your first festival…

Matt: First festival… first film-related experience, really. I’m learning, trying to figure it out.

David: Do you come from a film background?

Matt: No, more like art history and fine arts…studio art stuff. But, I watched films while I was growing up like crazy.

David: “You’ve seen movies?”

Matt: (laughs) Maybe just a couple. You know, I just started making a bunch of short films about five years ago and then about three years ago I was like OK, I really want to make a feature. So I started writing a couple, just kind of dedicating all my time towards writing and finding the right project, and then I met Amy and I found her story.

David: So you guys met as a result of this, you didn’t know each other before?

Amy: No we didn’t.

David: And you’d been acting before?

Amy: In my apartment, if that counts.

David: It definitely counts.

Amy: In my wildest dreams, I thought, ‘yeah that’s definitely something I’d like to do someday, but I have no idea about doing it. How about we just write a script?’ (Laughing)

David: How did that conversation even start since you didn’t look at her as an actress, first? How do you make that leap from “I don’t even know this person” to “you should be an actress in this movie?”

Matt: I don’t know, I kind of just had this idea for a story that I wanted to expand and, I had been reading Amy’s blog and she’s a great writer. I asked her if she’d be interested in taking this little idea I had and writing a short story because she had been telling me that she wrote them, so she was very interested and then went into chemo, and then, obviously, disappeared into chemo world.

Amy: That put a damper on the writing (laughing).

Matt: And then I hadn’t seen her and we kind of crossed paths accidentally and decided to meet up one afternoon in a coffee shop towards the end of her treatment. So I said to her ‘Oh, you must be excited that your treatment is coming to an end’ and she said ‘no, I’m not’ and I was just struck by that. She said ‘it’s the only thing I had ever done from beginning to end. It’s my purpose, but it’s weird, how can it be?’

She was only 31 at the time. And I just, related to that and was a little weirded out at first because I’ve never had cancer but what I realized was that I related to her vulnerability. I was just getting out of a relationship and was feeling the same way, very unsettled, so I thought it would be interesting to explore that through Amy’s story and I found that to be so much more interesting and unique. I mean, if you’ve ever felt unsettled or vulnerable, you can relate to Lily.

David: It felt to me like a coming of age story in a way, with higher stakes. So, Amy, it seems like your experience with cancer was something that you wanted to communicate and express, as opposed to something you wanted to internalize.

Amy: Yeah, as Matt was saying, I already had a blog to chronicle the treatment as it happened.

David: So you started the blog when you were diagnosed?

Amy: I started it the day I was diagnosed. I just thought this could be really important because I was so young and there was just nothing out there for me that was the least bit comforting.

I thought it was important when we talked about doing the script to show what for me was the hardest part emotionally, which surprisingly was when it all came to an end because you know, everyone was happy for me. My friends were ecstatic, the doctors were ecstatic, other patients were ecstatic…but I went from having a very tight-knit family of doctors and nurses, assistants, other patients, and then literally overnight waking up and everyone was gone.

David: There’s a certain inertia of being in that life and then…

Amy: It’s hard because you’re supposed to wake up the next day and it was the hardest day of my life. You know, get out of bed and there’s supposed to be little Disney birds flying around your head and it wasn’t like that at all. It took me about three weeks to get over being really bummed out.

David: Yeah, I was struck by the obvious intimacy between Lily and her various doctors.

Amy: Luckily I get to see some of them because I still have to go pretty frequently for check-ups, and its ridiculous because I kind of get a little excited when it’s time to see my oncologist and I’m like ‘Hey, how’ve you been?’. But it really is like seeing an old friend because these are people that were with me constantly for almost two years of my life and its intense – that’s a long relationship.

large_lily_2

David: To what extent is the film autobiographic in that sense… how much of the details explicitly reflect your story?

Amy: Yeah, 80-85%. A lot of it.

Matt: I mean, it’s like some things are true but then you embellish them a bit to make it more cinematic and you kind of give it that narrative pleasure.

Amy: The cancer stuff is all real, like having that gene and you know, doing the egg retrievals.

David: Well, the gene thing really struck me because so much of the film is about the rift between the things we choose and the things that choose us, especially as it pertains to Lily’s parents. There’s the hereditary nature of the disease, but also Lily’s relationship with her parents, which is strained on both sides, and inspires her to she make a very clear decision to become her own person…

Matt: The film is definitely about choices, and making choices from kind of this little window we all get every so often. Not to sound sentimental in a way, but every so often you get this opportunity where you have this clarity and I find that comes from being very vulnerable, and it’s one of the purest state of minds we can be in. A lot of people don’t want to stay there very long because it f**king sucks and you see yourself and you see everything and it’s really scary so we tend to stay where we are and not try to move forward and just not deal with things.

For Lily, she really sees it and is like ‘alright, I need to do something here. I don’t need to do something insane but I need to take a step in the right direction, or in the opposite direction of what I’m going into’.

Amy: Yeah. The day you’re diagnosed and it’s decided you’re going to need treatment because surgery isn’t enough, you have ‘x’ amount of time mapped out for you from there.  In my case, they said you’ll do two surgeries, chemo and then do radiation, so you know from this month to this month my life is planned and it’s kind of great, but then afterwards you have to make decisions again.

In regards to making choices, we had someone ask a question last night that at the time, I kind of tried to brush it off, but she was saying how she wished that Lily had just said something to her dad, or emailed him or anything and, I have to be careful not to get defensive because it is a character, but I found myself thinking about it this morning when I was walking around and thought it was a really good question because it shows how different our choices are for each of us as individuals because she might’ve been projecting her life onto me with that question.

Maybe she’s got a great relationship with her dad, and it would be devastating to her if he didn’t know, and maybe it’s hard for her to understand that someone might not have a relationship at all with her father and then vice versa, like it’s hard for me to understand what it’s like to have a good one.

David: That might be the healthiest response to a Q&A question in the history of film festivals.

Amy: (laughs) But truly, I think with most questions in an environment like that, that’s a reaction to art or any form of music, cinema or painting. I think a lot of questions that come up for us are obviously from us, you know, we’re projecting in some way. So that was a good question, emotionally difficult, but good.

David: Well, the art is important to that moment as well because to me, I didn’t read it as a decision for her not to reach out to her father at all, but just her expressing herself in a particular way and her father not being especially engaged.

Amy:  And that was just one moment. Who knows what could happen later.

Matt: To me, my response to that question is that she just opened a dialogue. There is just so much she hasn’t seen in three years or spoken to him in three years and, she immediately sees him and he’s just a fucking asshole.  I think Lily really wants to tell him but maybe just not at that moment. Maybe she goes back later on, but that’s just another film, right? And you can’t just cover everything.

Amy: Well, we were at asked if we’re doing a sequel.

David: Like a trilogy.

Amy: (laughs) “Lily: Part Two.”

Matt: We had talked through the writing process but to me, that was a very honest response and the moment was very human. I think a lot of people want to go and tell someone something and they have the opportunity, and they just can’t do it because it doesn’t feel right or that person has scarred them enough to where… you know, obviously there were some medical things there with the gene, but I think it was one moment.

Amy: For sure.

THE CONVERSATION CONTINUES ON PAGE 2.

Categories: Interviews

Tags: Amy Grantham, Director's cut, Interview, Lily, Matt Creed, Tribeca film festival

Rabu, 25 September 2013

Director’s Cut: Seimetz on ‘Sun Don’t Shine,’ ‘Upstream Color’ and Why Murder Is Bad

Screen Shot 2013-04-25 at 5.53.57 PM

Right now, as you read this, Amy Seimetz is blowing up. Just now she got a little more famous. There, it happened again. There’s a good chance that by breakfast tomorrow there will even be a bit of a backlash. But for now – right now – this is her moment.

A veteran actress on the micro-indie stage (“Alexander the Last,” “Gabi on the Roof in July,”) she can currently be seen in the much ballyhooed “Upstream Color.” In addition to that, she has three major acting gigs in the can – Lionsgate’s horror/comedy “You’re Next,” Christopher Guest’s HBO show “Family Tree” and one of the new lead roles in AMC’s third season of “The Killing.”

Seimetz’s first feature as a director, the award-winning “Sun Don’t Shine,” is about to make its theatrical and VOD debut. It stars Kate Lyn Sheil and Kentucker Audley as two lovers on the run with a dead body in their trunk. It is shot on 16mm film in the blazing Flordia sun and it is lyrical and elliptical and refuses to make excuses for its characters. It’s a remarkable vehicle for Sheil, who, by all rights, ought to be blowing up right alongside Seimetz.

This past Sunday the New York Times ran a profile that, no offense to the Grey Lady, was exciting for Ms. Seimetz’s scrapbook, but didn’t do much to tell us what made her tick. We had the good fortune to catch her via telephone very late on Sunday night, tuckered out from shooting and not beholden to any normal talking points. As such, this conversation is all over the place. However, it is just that – a conversation. We invite you to read along.

Jordan Hoffman: I first saw “Sun Don’t Shine” a little over one year ago when it played the festival circuit. At the end of last year the Indiewire Critics’ Poll named it the Best Undistributed Film. I imagine that is among the most strangely gratifying awards out there – a real rebuke to the world, like, hey, what the hell, you guys all screwed up!

Amy Seimetz: Of course. It’s a strange world, where I’m working on television shows and winning the “best film not distributed.” But only because I didn’t set out to make stuff that’s mainstream. I’ve always tried to make personal and, earlier on, aggressive films. So it’s interesting for me to come into a place where you’re not sure if you’re becoming more mainstream or if you are suddenly finding your voice.

Well, I wanted to talk about this later, but you are alluding to acting in HBO show “Family Tree” and the new season of “The Killing,” neither of which have debuted yet. Is this something that keeps you up nights? Are you, to say it like we did when we were in college, worried about “losing your cred?”

How do you lose your cred working for Christopher Guest?

Fair point.

And … have you watched “The Killing?”

Um, no, but …

Well, the way that they shoot – the way both shows shoot, actually – they are really pushing boundaries of story. “The Killing” is a slow burn and you are allowed to breathe with characters, and understand a world that is uncomfortable. It’s very punchy and entertaining, don’t get me wrong, but it goes to dark places.

And when the season finale happens everyone loses their s**t on the Internet. Like I said, I haven’t gotten to this show yet, but I know people freak the hell out about it. Are you prepared for that sort of feedback?

I don’t know. Truth is, I don’t know how Season Three ends. I know the trajectory, but not the ending. I try to stay away from the response to stuff as best I can, but someone asked me “are you ready for people to really hate you?” I was … “huh? What do you mean?”

These longform stories on cable, people get really tied up in them. So, yeah, you’ll be spat upon in the streets.

I’d rather that than play some woman who is easy to deal with.

So, let’s let you shill for a minute, Amy Seimetz. For idiots like me who have their heads in the sand, I would imagine that Season Three is the perfect place for a newcomer to jump in?

Yes, absolutely true.

It’s as if it were made for guys like me who have been meaning to catch “The Killing,” but haven’t, and now I can.

This is all totally true.

Elias Koteas is in the new cast.

I know, right? Isn’t he amazing? But it’s funny, most of my scenes are outside of Elias, but we’re all really excited to be with him. But I don’t have any fun set stories, I don’t have any scenes with him. He’s around, though, and I do get a little starstruck. Same as on “Family Tree.”

What is your favorite scene from a Christopher Guest movie?

In “Waiting For Guffman,” when he’s trying to sell that the community needs to give him $100,000 for him to put on his play. When he’s telling them how dreamy and wonderful the play will be. And they all say “it’s great! It’s wonderful!” and they are so supportive, then he says he wants $100,000 and the board says they have something like $15,000 for the entire arts funding. And he gets so mad and tells them that they are all awful people. [starts laughing.] It’s the reactions, really, and that’s what’s so great about his films. They are so human – it doesn’t just go to a funny level just to be funny – it’s human and it’s painful.

Guest’s films really did anticipate the proliferation of lot of the semi-scripted stuff that’s happening on TV, as well as the “comedy of embarrassment.”

He’s the beacon of a very specific format.

You have some scenes with Fred Willard?

Oh, yeah. He just turns on. He’s a beautifully eccentric man. In real life you just think “okay, he’s just this eccentric dude” then the camera comes on and this wild world comes out of his mouth. It’s just, “wow, he is holding all these beautiful ideas inside.” Same with Bob Balaban.

Another guy who has directed some great films.

Right? Everyone on this show is, in a way, writing and directing their own material outside of it.

You should bill them triple.

Huh.

Okay, enough chit-chat. Let’s talk about “Sun Don’t Shine.” This movie begins with an outstanding opening scene, and an outstanding opening shot. Woe be to anyone who comes to the theater a minute late and misses the opening shot. Was this in draft one?

Not draft one, but as I got a firmer grasp on the immediacy, then yes. By the time we shot I knew that was going to be the opening. Initially I had a prologue.

Was the prologue about the victim? Or about the off-screen child?

It was about the child. The prologue was going to set up the Mom telling a bedtime story to the daughter, then later you realize she’s telling the story as a rationalization of the actions she did – a fairy tale in a way that explains why someone would do something like this.

That’s interesting to me, because one of the things I find when watching this movie is wondering just what kind of mother is Kate Lyn Sheil. She is, if I can speak bluntly, she’s such a mess, that you think “I want to see her with her child.” “How does she behave as a mother?” is one of the big question marks.

Yes, and that is why I excluded it. I really wanted to extract a female character from the role of being a mom. You can decide if she’s a good mom or not, but extract her from the roles of motherhood or a professional setting or whether she’s ambitious, then you just have a person in an existential crisis.

We only see her in this pressure cooker environment. We never see her at rest.

Exactly, that’s my take on it. Your role as a mother or a professional person – it’s done and gone. You are doomed by the situation.

Right. You know, as a guy who writes movie reviews, I often think about how people would write about things. If you see the character before and she works, say, selling car insurance, the graf might read “Kate Lyn Sheil, a car insurance agent, is on the run with her boyfriend …” when it isn’t relevant.

It’s funny, when Kate and I talked when this first was shown and some people got angry at the movie, we noticed that people got really angry at her. No one got mad at him [Kentucker Audley.] But she shouldn’t be doing these things! People got angry. I loved that they were freaking out.

There should be more – usually that anger is reserved for male parts, for the Ray Liotta parts, you know? [laughs.] Which is funny because I just watched “Killing Them Softly” and for the first time I was like, “wow, I feel sad for this character.”

I love that movie.

I loved it! Andrew Dominik. It’s so great. It’s shot so gorgeously. Greig Fraser is a terrific DP.

I saw that with my chum Matt Patches of Hollywood.com at a screening room in New York City and when we got in the elevator he and I were over the moon about it, and a very well-put-together older woman audibly chuffed at us. “That movie was vile and despicable,” she said, and we were like “We know!”

[laughs.] Yes, I know, I agree, it’s vile, it’s violent and brutal. What I loved about it was that I felt so bad for the criminals. I felt really sad for Ray Liotta. So, what I was thinking was, women don’t get to play these parts – roles that say “here I am, here’s where I exist in the world and you either hate me or you don’t, but I’ll give you all this baggage and this is how I’m dealing with this shit.”

Kate and I made a joke. I said “maybe when you go to the payphone” – there’s a big scene in “Sun Don’t Shine” where he sees her at a payphone – “maybe instead of it being ambiguous about whether you called your daughter or your mom or not, maybe we should have had you trading stocks. Shouting ‘buy buy buy! sell sell sell!’” Then people would say “well, at least she knows how to trade stocks.”

There’s a weird fake form of feminism that, in order to be a complete human being, you need to have a stronghold on your professional life in a cinematic sense. If I gave her some mundane knowledge, like knowing how to sell stocks, then people would think that she had some self-worth in the world, you know? People would say “this isn’t so bad, now.”

sun-don_t-shine_1

One could argue she’s been put upon her own life, and has never had an opportunity to quote unquote better herself.

That’s what I wanted to explore. What does it mean to be a victim? I didn’t want to shy away from the unhealthy aspects of victim status. Especially the participatory aspects of it. Why do women keep finding themselves in these positions? Or men, for that matter. The willingness to allow yourself in the position until it is too late. That’s a controversial stance to take – but I think it is empowering for victims to recognize that they are, in some way, allowing themselves to be victims.

Do you consider “Sun Don’t Shine” a cautionary tale?

It’s complicated. More of an exploration. There’s no message I’m trying to bring home.

Well, “crime doesn’t pay” is in there.

Well, right, but specifically, there’s no excuse for behavior. You can have all these things happen, but murder is not a good choice.

That’s the headline. Amy Seimetz: Murder is Not a Good Choice.

Yes.

This movie is set in Florida. Whenever someone sends you a tabloid story about some outlandish crime, it’s always in Florida. You’re from Florida. What the hell’s going on down there?

Always Florida, seriously. I’m born and raised, and that’s the feeling. I didn’t grow up with people who shoved bodies in trunks, but there is a feeling that this could happen to you at any moment. It’s a violent place and only when I moved away did I realize not everyone went to high schools were there were four violent fights a day. Or that violence was not the obvious way to end an argument.

Could it be the heat?

Yes, I think this is a huge aspect, seriously. Heat makes you crazy. If you are in the heat for long periods of time it changes the way you approach things. You are just “I don’t care, I just want this done” attitude, in the way you dress, the way you act. Statistically, crime increases as heat increases. It gets your atoms moving faster and more aggravated.

Also, Florida is a confused landscape. Like Australia, they sent criminals down there to dredge this inhabitable place into a vacation land. Who else would go down? They made a work program.

Ever seen John Sayles’ “Sunshine State?”

Oh, God, yes, I love that movie. And I told John Sayles that unabashedly when I was in Toronto with “A Horrible Way To Die.” I saw him and ran over and flipped out and everyone told me I was being really uncool.

It’s okay to be uncool around a guy like John Sayles, I mean, what the hell?

Right, that’s what I said. I said “you guys are being uncool!” Everyone was standing around saying that he was their hero and I’m the one who ran over!

There’s a brief moment at a low-rent Mermaid Show, with a woman breathing through a hose. . .

It’s real!

Yeah, I had a hunch.

I made a documentary about that place with James Ponsoldt. It’s a time-warp roadside attraction. It just felt right to go there, a place set for escape, right on the water. And mermaids, the transformation of women, these mythical creatures, is a theme in the whole film – I’d written them in as sirens, as a noir aspect.

Boy, I’m an idiot. That blazed right past me. Don’t tell anyone I said that, that’s embarrassing.

Eh, it’s fine.

Mermaids date back to sirens who would lure to men in the water. Now, the ones that fascinate me the most are the ones that just want to play. They lure men to come and play and they aren’t aware that men can’t breathe and they die. I like the idea of someone who is unaware of the consequences.

These are sirens who are in no way malicious, just joyous and playful and killing men unbeknownst to themselves?

Yes, this is much more interesting to me than the typical femme fatale. Someone with no control over their emotions, who aren’t self-aware about why they need someone else.

THE CONVERSATION CONTINUES ON PAGE 2.

Categories: Interviews

Tags: Amy seimetz, Christopher guest, Director's cut, Interview, Sun Don't Shine, The killing, Upstream Color

Senin, 23 September 2013

Director’s Cut: Mira Nair (‘The Reluctant Fundamentalist’)

20120828_mira_nair

Director Mira Nair has been making waves around the world since her first film, 1998's “Salaam Bombay!” debuted to critical praise. Nair has created a fascinating and juicy body of work that cuts a wide swath through global cinema, from the cross-cultural romance “Mississippi Masala” to the dazzling wedding drama “Monsoon Wedding.” Always a forward-thinker, she was way ahead of the cable TV curve when she made the HBO original film “Hysterical Blindness,” with Gena Rowlands, Uma Thurman, and Juliette Lewis; she also gave “Harold and Kumar” star Kal Penn his first real dramatic role in her adaptation of “The Namesake” by Pulitzer Prize-winning author Jhumpa Lahiri.

Mira Nair’s latest film is an adaptation of Mohsin Hamid’s bestselling and critically acclaimed novel “The Reluctant Fundamentalist.” A young Pakistani professor named Changez (Riz Ahmed) is reflecting on his life in American before and after 9/11, and how his own identity and beliefs have changed over the years since he graduated from Princeton and worked on Wall Street. Nair’s adaptation also stars Liev Schreiber as a journalist interviewing Changez for a story on revolutionary educators, Kate Hudson as Changez’s American lover Erica, and Kiefer Sutherland as his former boss.

Nair was in New York City to attend the Tribeca Film Festival premiere of “The Reluctant Fundamentalist” when we met up with her for a chat earlier this week. It opens in limited cities on April 26th.

Jenni Miller: Let’s talk about your personal connection to the book and the work, because I noticed the movie was dedicated to your father.

Mira Nair: The first bolt of inspiration to make “The Reluctant Fundamentalist” actually came not from the book but from my first trip to Pakistan in 2004. As a kid in modern India, you don’t get to go across the border into a country that was once one but now is riddled by conflict, and really a wall, so I was just dazzled… Firstly, it was just deeply familiar because the language, the poetry, the music, the realm of artistic expression is extraordinary. And it’s nothing like what you think Pakistan is from the papers, even in India or here.

Also check out: Our review of “The Reluctant Fundamentalist”

Of course, it was familiar because my father had raised us somewhat Lahore in India; we spoke Urdu, we knew these poems, we knew that music. And so I wanted to immediately make a tale about contemporary Pakistan.

Indian directors have stopped with the partition. We’ve never seen beyond that, you know? And then, then I read Mohsin’s novel, about 18 months later. Like him, I’ve lived half my life here and half my life in the subcontinent, and not only did it give me the chance to make a tale about modern Pakistan, but it was a dialogue in its bones, with America. And I so much want this dialogue to happen, because I’ve lived here, I’ve felt the impact of 9/11 right in my front yard, and I’ve seen the reaction to it, and the consequences that we are paying for those reactions.

I think that the answer is not, you’re either with us or against us, or you’re black or white, or you’re good or evil. I think the answer is in opening our minds and hearts and knowing that on the other side are also human beings, as complicated and as fun and as human and as believing in all the things we believe in, as in this country. So that’s what I tried to do, because we don’t have this conversation; it’s always a monologue, it’s always one point of view. And Mohsin’s and my own sensibility wanted to create the dialogue.

One thing I really enjoy about your filmmaking is behind the scenes, which is how predominantly female your crew is. Do you think that’s the secret of women breaking through in film, is supporting other women, whether as cast, crew, producers – what do you think that brings to the game?

Well, my crew is largely female simply because they’re simply superb at what they do, and take me further in every respect. A big part of making film is the family with which you make film, and I’m so blessed to have this film family that I have, of course, nourished since 20, 25 years…

In terms of the paucity of female filmmakers, because this really is a conundrum for me — I just feel like it’s one of the saddest things because I work so differently and work with so many spirited women [laughs] — but I think that we have to plow on and we just have to keep not subscribing to being part of a cookie cut kind of world, but plow on with the courage of being distinct and having our own voices and our stories, because look at this story. It is a story of about the world and its multiplicity, and it’s because I also live in three countries… I am forced to expand my worldview.

Similarly, as a woman, one has these multi arms, you know, like the goddesses in India [laughs], and we excel in doing these different things at every moment, different roles I play and we play all. I just think to make movies you have to have a core of very strong self-belief, and you have to have something to say.

I read a really wonderful quote from Kate Hudson that she was recuperating from childbirth and not feeling great one day on set, and that you rubbed her feet?

[laughs] I used to do whatever because she is the most unpretentious person. She came with no entourage, absolutely unfettered, you know? And I loved that, I loved there was no some drama, you know, mishegoss every time to do it. She was totally open, and I’ve given birth so I know what that feels like, and it’s amazing that she managed to do all this. So I would do whatever she needed, you know? I rubbed her feet.

She would be breastfeeding, and I would just – she didn’t need anything, but I would cover her up [laughing] – anything to make her [comfortable]… I just love working with her and love how her – she just is brave, she just embraces instinct in every way. Her whole personality is like that, so I’m pretty similar in some senses.

Is it true that you turned down “Harry Potter”?

Well, it’s true in the sense that yeah, we went down the road a long way [laughs] – if I could have, I could have, you know? But I was just two months before shooting “The Namesake,” and I was deep in that. “Namesake” was really fueled by loss, and yet I felt divided because my son learned to read on “Harry Potter.” But he was the one who liberated me. He said, “Many can make ‘Harry Potter,’” but he said, “Mama, only you can make ‘The Namesake.’” It really was a beautiful lesson from a 14-year-old. He’s a great guy. He’s 21 now.

The film, in a way, is made for him and his group of people, the twenty-somethings of the world, because we’re all on this journey of finding out who we are, and it’s even more complicated when you come from many places or one other place or whatever. It’s seeking to hold a mirror to that journey, to make you question where will you be heard? What is that truth that they hand out to you? So, let’s see, I’m hoping to galvanize the young.

Categories: Interviews

Tags: Director's cut, Harry potter, Interview, Kate hudson, Mira nair, The Reluctant Fundamentalist

Minggu, 22 September 2013

Tribeca Review: ‘The Reluctant Fundamentalist’

Screen Shot 2013-04-24 at 3.34.28 PM

Is it paranoia to believe that religious extremists, including Islamic extremists, walk among us every day? Or, in the wake of events like the Boston Marathon bombing – accompanied by the still-unraveling backstories of its perpetrators – is it just good common sense to accept that radical acts of evil might happen anytime, anywhere?

We can’t expect Mira Nair’s “The Reluctant Fundamentalist,” adapted from Mohsin Hamid’s novel, to answer those unanswerable questions. But the timing of the movie’s appearance on the scene counts for something: This is the story of a young Pakistani man, Changez – played by the almost alarmingly charismatic Riz Ahmed – who claims to love the United States and (almost) everything it stands for. Yet an American journalist and spy, Bobby (Liev Schreiber), suspects that Changez may have masterminded the kidnaping of an American professor from a university in Lahore. Changez tells Bobby his story, revealing it in a series of flashbacks. Should Bobby trust the tale and the teller, or neither?

Even if you haven’t read Hamid’s novel, it’s pretty clear from the start where “The Reluctant Fundamentalist” is going to lead. But in getting there, Nair opens up some compelling questions, even if she isn’t always so surefooted in dramatizing them. This is a thriller, and Nair works hard to make it thrilling, with uneven results. There are too many moments when it’s nearly impossible to buy either the characters’ actions or their feelings.

But Nair does have a powerful ally in her star, Ahmed, who has previously appeared in “Trishna,” Michael Winterbottom’s jagged, emphatic reimagining of “Tess of the D’Urbervilles,” as well as the wobbly jihadist comedy “Four Lions.” Ahmed plays two characters here, rolled into one human being: There’s the Changez who comes to America as a young man, attending Princeton and assimilating so well that he’s hired by a scrappy little Wall Street firm (his boss is a wily Cheshire Cat played by Kiefer Sutherland) and lands an artsy-rich American girlfriend (played by a not-so-kittenish Kate Hudson). And then there’s the Changez who, disoriented and disillusioned by the way Americans treat him after 9/11, returns to Pakistan to teach at a university there, intentionally or otherwise instilling revolutionary ideas in his students.

The Americanized Changez speaks in loose-limbed U.S. English; back at home, in Pakistan, his diction is clipped and formal, the stiff language of pamphlets and slogans. Ahmed plays the character so we feel immediately comfortable with his U.S. incarnation and instantly wary of the more spiritually rigid Pakistani who has returned to his homeland. Still, both versions of the character are seductive, and that’s what gives the movie its crackle. Like Bobby, we want to trust Changez, but we’re not sure we dare to.

Ahmed is so good that it’s a shame Nair can’t always adequately control the story around him. Changez’s Wall Street job involves evaluating companies’ worth and then finding ways to increase it, which generally involves cutting employees. In one scene, he coldly faces a group of average Middle Americans, trying to make them see how logical it is that their jobs should be eliminated. Later, when he’s confronted in the parking lot by one of these disgruntled workers, the moment is framed as jingoistic — a racist attack, a good reason for Ahmed to feel uncomfortable in his adopted home. Nair and her screenwriters (Hamid, Ami Boghani and William Wheeler collaborated on the script) don’t allow for the fact that, old-fashioned racism aside, this guy has plenty of cause to be angry with Changez. The sequence is ham-fisted, when what it demands is the utmost delicacy. “How dare this guy come to our country to fire me!” is a very different emotion from “He’s dark-skinned, he’s from over there, so he probably hates America and Americans.” Nair blurs the line carelessly, to the point that we don’t feel as much sympathy for Changez as perhaps we should.

Although “The Reluctant Fundamentalist” raises some complicated questions, in the end, it doesn’t challenge that much – the picture adequately and efficiently grooms to see Changez’s story from many angles, so we can emerge from it feeling reasonable and self-congratulatory. Yet Ahmed’s performance has enough mystery embedded that sometimes he succeeds in making us wonder if he is the willing servant of a vengeful God. It’s the single discomfiting element of a movie that’s otherwise just too reassuring.

SCORE: 6.0 / 10

Categories: Reviews

Tags: Mira nair, Review, The Reluctant Fundamentalist, Tribeca film festival

Jumat, 20 September 2013

Baymageddon: One Man Tries to Survive A Full Day of Michael Bay

"Pain & Gain" Premiere - Red Carpet Arrivals

Like it or not — and I find myself switching sides depending on the film — Michael Bay’s distinct directorial swagger remains the hyper-active, hyper-masculine and altogether inevitable manifestation of American culture’s collective id. At best, the man makes giddily exaggerated entertainments; at worst, he delivers ordeals. In celebration of his latest release, “Pain & Gain,” the programming team at Austin’s Alamo Drafthouse offered up a four-movie marathon of Bay’s blockbusters for last Sunday’s “Baymageddon” event. The monetary cost of attending was relatively negligible, but what greater toll would my brain cells pay in the end?

2:00 PM: Alamo programmer/event mastermind Greg MacLennan took to the stage with reliable enthusiasm as he pumped up the crowd for an all-but-revealed lineup, to be played in the order suggested by Bay himself and for the most part gracing the screen in honest-to-goodness 35mm. MacLennan did this while standing before a close-enough replica rocket that tipped the identity of the day’s first film, and if that didn’t do the trick, then the V-X gas swallowing contest to follow (involving bowls of green Jell-O, naturally) should have sealed it.

The-Rock-Nicolas-Cage-film-review-shelf-heroes

“Let’s hope this elevates their thinking.” -General Francis X. Hummel (Ed Harris), “The Rock”

2:15: First, trailers for “Escape from Alcatraz” and “Highlander 2: The Quickening,” then “The Rock.” Bay’s second collaboration with Jerry Bruckheimer certified his maximalist appeal alongside fellow ‘90s juggernauts Tony Scott and John Woo, as General Hummel’s biochemical threat against San Francisco finds itself tested by the covert arrival of FBI Agent Stanley Goodspeed (Nicolas Cage) and former Alcatraz escapee John Mason (Sean Connery). If the camera ever held still, it was almost certainly aimed square at the sweaty face of a shouting authority figure; in Bay’s films, there is hardly ever any wiggle room between chaotic action and stoic reaction.

Also check out: Michael Bay’s films ranked from best to worst

Then again, many of Bay’s films to follow would rarely establish stakes, motives and that ticking clock with such efficiency, nor would they benefit from the seasoned presence of a pre-retirement Connery and the antic asides of a pre-shark jump Cage. In fact, the latter’s role results in many of the film’s laughs, which makes the glaring inclusion of a mincing hairstylist and not one, not two, but three loud black extras feel like so much needless pandering. “The Rock” would not mark the last time that Bay had seen fit to include these particularly egregious stereotypes…

2rm70op

“This is some sick s**t!” “Yep, and it’s about to get sicker…” -Detectives Marcus Burnett (Martin Lawrence) and Mike Lowrey (Will Smith), “Bad Boys II”

4:45: Trailers for “Cop and a Half” and Sean Penn’s “Bad Boys,” then “Bad Boys II.” As if the sight of Bay’s own “directed by” credit flanked by a burning cross wasn’t warning enough, this half-fun and beyond bloated sequel not only epitomizes Bay’s penchant for excess, but marks a distinct turning point in his career when simply big, dumb and loud action flicks curdled into more egregious, offensive and cumbersome affairs. Between his transparent efforts to replicate “Titanic” with 2001’s “Pearl Harbor” and the pitifully poor performance of the perfectly big, dumb, loud “The Island” to follow, it’s little wonder that, beneath all their digital mayhem, his “Transformers” films would come to share the same exclusionary characteristics and woefully misguided humor of “BB2.”

For the record, I remain in awe of roughly fifty percent of this film, namely the overwhelmingly practical action sequences and one particular line of dialogue about the imminent realness of some particular s**t, but when that wanton destruction isn’t being marred by the flippant desecration of corpses, it’s surrounded by groan-inducing gags involving collapsing backyard pools, Marcus accidentally ingesting ecstasy, and an exhaustive amount of homophobic misunderstandings in a Miami electronics store. Sure enough, it’s in this last scene when both a shrill black woman and an effeminate gay couple feel the need to chime in with catty commentary. Yet people were still surprised by the time “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” introduced its minstrel-show robot sidekicks…

Screen Shot 2013-04-25 at 10.51.03 AM

“I understand that you were handicapped by a natural immaturity, and I forgive you.” -Grace Stamper (Liv Tyler), “Armageddon”

7:20: Trailers for “Space Camp,” “The Fifth Element” and the first “Transformers” film, then “Armageddon.” This film just didn’t mark our return to the relative sanctity of ‘90s Bay efforts, it brought with it the most purely basic plot (I know) of his entire career. An asteroid careens towards Earth, and a crew of oil-rig roughnecks led by Harry Stamper (Bruce Willis) are charged with flying into space and blowing the thing up. Sure, we’re gifted ancillary antagonists in the form of meddlesome government officials and interpersonal friction between Stamper and hot-headed protégé/potential son-in-law A.J. (Ben Affleck) along the way, but the disaster flick formula shines above all that, barreling towards a planet-killing deadline with enough sheer force to render bearable questionable diagnoses regarding space dementia and sunset seduction scenes involving the very strategic placement of animal crackers.

Oh, and Bay gets his token black extra in right at the very start, because when the end of the world comes, may we all be so lucky as to hear the news first out of Eddie Griffin’s mouth.

10:00: A second pair of volunteers agree to chug down a raw egg before racing each other to conduct five push-ups, resulting in an Aesop-worthy upset and no apparent puking.

pain-and-gain1

“I’ve watched a lot of movies, Paul. I know what I’m doing.” -Daniel Lugo (Mark Wahlberg), “Pain & Gain”

10:10: A cheeky video intro filmed by Bay himself for just this occasion, then “Pain & Gain.” What a strange thought that the explosion-meister’s “small movie” is redeemed in part for the sheer, thorough awfulness of its characters because Bay actually seems aware that these are, in fact, thoroughly awful people. Based on the true crimes of Miami’s Sun Gym gang in late 1994 and early 1995, “P&G” concerns itself with three materialistic men who might have very well gone on to worship Bay’s fetishistic stylings had they not been caught for their heinous and ultimately murderous efforts at extorting their richer clients.

Like “Killing Them Softly” set in sunnier climes, the film follows around fitness instructor Daniel Lugo (Mark Wahlberg) as he ropes bodybuilding buddies Adrian Doorbal (Anthony Mackie) and Paul Doyle (Dwayne Johnson, hilarious here) among others into sharing his own aggressive American dream. All involved were seemingly tempted towards their crimes due to a contagious combination of ambition and arrogance, and for a good while, Bay would seem to have fashioned a darkly funny condemnation of what some might think it takes in order to keep up with the Joneses, this in spite of his old knack for homophobia coming back to bite him on the ass. However, that cynicism finds itself counterbalanced by fewer and fewer laughs as “P&G” needlessly drags itself toward the two-hour mark, and what initially seems like a knowingly slick portrayal of successfully lunk-headed living comes perilously close to becoming a hollow exercise in non-stop cynicism.

When the Coen Brothers took a similar tack in both “Fargo” and “Burn After Reading,” they found these criminal misdeeds either tragically funny or just plain tragic. Bay doesn’t quite bring the same weight of moral authority to his picture, but when you look at the last two films he made about bad boys in Miami — let alone any three films of his, viewed back-to-back-to-back — “Pain & Gain” can’t help but resemble some measure of progress.

Categories: No Categories

Tags: Alamo drafthouse, Armageddon, Bad Boys II, Michael bay, Movie Marathon, Pain & Gain, The rock

Rabu, 18 September 2013

SAFE HEAVEN (2013)

SAFE HEAVEN (2013)

Tanggal Rilis :14 February 2013 (USA)
Jenis Film : Drama | Mystery | Romance
Diperankan Oleh : Julianne Hough, David Lyons, Josh Duhamel

Ringkasan Cerita SAFE HEAVEN (2013) :

When a mysterious young woman named Katie appears in the small North Carolina town of Southport, her sudden arrival raises questions about her past. Beautiful yet self-effacing, Katie seems determined to avoid forming personal ties until a series of events draws her into two reluctant relationships: one with Alex, a widowed store owner with a kind heart and two young children; and another with her plainspoken single neighbor, Jo.

Despite her reservations, Katie slowly begins to let down her guard, putting down roots in the close-knit community and becoming increasingly attached to Alex and his family. But even as Katie begins to fall in love, she struggles with the dark secret that still haunts and terrifies her . . . a past that set her on a fearful, shattering journey across the country, to the sheltered oasis of Southport. With Jo’s empathic and stubborn support, Katie eventually realizes that she must choose between a life of transient safety and one of riskier rewards . . . and …

[IMDb rating : 6.3/10]
[Awards : 4 nominations]
[Production Co : Relativity Media, Temple Hill Entertainment, Nicholas Sparks Productions]
[IMDb link : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1702439]

[Quality : BRRip 720p]
[File Size : 800 MB]
[Format : Matroska >> mkv]
[Resolution : 1280x536]
[Source : 720p.BluRay-SPARKS]
[Encoder : scOrp]

BillionUploads
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 |
Extract with winrar
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Megaload
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 |
Extract with winrar
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Uppit
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 |
Extract with winrar
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Zippyshare
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 |
Extract with winrar
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
180upload
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 |
Extract with winrar
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Single Link
Download Single File 180upload

Download English Subtitle (Muxed)
Download Indonesian Subtitle (Not available yet)

Watch this Full Movie with High Quality Streaming

Bagi Pengunjung Baru klik di sini Cara Menggabungkan File Ekstensi .001 dan .002


( klik " Like " Dan " +1 " jika kamu suka Film ini )

Selasa, 17 September 2013

DOSE OF REALITY (2013)

DOSE OF REALITY (2013)

Tanggal Rilis : 28 February 2013 (USA)
Jenis Film : Drama | Mystery | Thriller
Diperankan Oleh : Fairuza Balk, Rick Ravanello, Ryan Merriman

Ringkasan Cerita DOSE OF REALITY (2013) :

2AM, closing time: A cocky bar manager with a shady past and a young handsome bartender discover a beautiful woman bloodied and unconscious in the bathroom of a late night lounge. When she awakens, Tony, Matt and the mysterious Rose are plunged into a stirring evening of dangerous role playing in an ever-escalating game of cat and mouse that forces them to face the dark shadows of themselves. As we begin to piece together the elaborate puzzle, nothing is what it seems. However, one thing is for certain: this Rose is full of thorns.

[IMDb rating : 5.9/10]
[Awards : - ]
[Production Co : 6A Films, Destiny Pictures]
[IMDb link : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1961279]

[Quality : WEB-DL 720p]
[File Size : 600 MB]
[Format : Matroska >> mkv]
[Resolution : 1280x720]
[Source : 720p.WEB-DL.X264-WEBiOS]
[Encoder : nItRo]

BillionUploads
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Megaload
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Uppit
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Zippyshare
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
180upload
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 | Part5 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders

Download English Subtitle (Muxed)
Download Indonesian Subtitle (Not available yet)

Watch this Full Movie with High Quality Streaming

Bagi Pengunjung Baru klik di sini Cara Menggabungkan File Ekstensi .001 dan .002


( klik " Like " Dan " +1 " jika kamu suka Film ini )

Minggu, 15 September 2013

Your Daily Short: ‘Bambi Meets Godzilla’

Welcome to Your Daily Short, a new feature on Film.com that will highlight and stream a short film at high noon. Every weekday. Every week.

TODAY’S SHORT: “Bambi Meets Godzilla” (Marv Newland) 1969

RUNNING TIME:  1:30

WHY YOU SHOULD WATCH IT: Um, did you read the title? Legend has it that filmmaker Marv Newland was planning on shooting a live-action film, but – upon losing the magic hour light for a key shot – frustratedly retreated to his bedroom, where he quickly devised this masterpiece of the short form. A classic tragedy that bridges the gap between Menander and Mickey Mouse, “Bambi Meets Godzilla” is a sobering reminder that every moment is a gift. Right?

Watch the previous Daily Short: “Brazzaville Teen-Ager”

Do you have a favorite short film that you would like us to feature as Your Daily Short? Whether it’s something you love, something you made, or both, send it along to Filmdotcomshorts@Gmail.com and you might see it on the site!

Categories: Columns

Tags: Bambi, Bambi Meets Godzilla, Godzilla, Short Film, Your Daily Short

Sabtu, 14 September 2013

Tribeca: Two Foreign Films Offer New Perspectives on the LGBT Experience

large_Floating_Skyscrapers_1_pubs

Coming out is old news. American and British gay cinema has, on the whole, largely moved past the coming out narrative. Over the last couple decades gay characters have not only become more prominent in the mainstream, but gay films have had quite the thematic evolution. Tragedies like “Brokeback Mountain” and “Boys Don’t Cry” and coming-out stories like “Get Real” and “Beautiful Thing” are still loved, but if they were to be made now the reaction might be less enthusiastic.

We no longer want to see idealized gay characters in stories that revolve around their being gay. Yet sometimes we forget that in many parts of the world, well beyond the gay-friendly movie metropolises of London, Los Angeles and New York, things are different.

Tomas Wasilewski’s crepuscular and deeply affecting “Floating Skyscrapers” comes to Tribeca from Poland, a deeply Catholic country where homophobia remains prevalent. Progress is being made, of course, and in 2011 the first gay MP was elected to parliament. Yet their cinema is only beginning to deal with homosexuality in a meaningful way, and Wasilewski’s new film is therefore a major contribution.

Of course, to view “Floating Skyscrapers” solely as a work of social politics would be a disservice. It’s artfully told and brutally honest, an almost ethereal tale of star-crossed lovers whose union is undercut by their recklessness and made impossible by a homophobic environment. Kuba (Mateusz Banasiuk) is a talented swimmer, training for national competition. He lives with his mother and his girlfriend, Sylwie (Marta Nieradkiewicz). She takes him along to an art gallery opening with some friends of hers, including Michal (Bartosz Gelner). The two young men hit it off, and the sexual tension begins to boil up under Kuba’s typically placid demeanor.

Sylwie begins to suspect something is wrong. Kuba spends more time with Michal. Kuba begins to lose interest in swimming, and Michal decides to come out to his family. There’s nothing groundbreaking here, only simple plot points that win us over with authenticity rather than ingenuity. All of the actors are performing to the best of their ability, fully entering into characters that require not only emotional veracity but also real physical presence. “Floating Skyscrapers” is about the human body, the way that Kuba stretches himself into a tryst with Michal or scrunches down in his continued dalliances with Sylwie.

Yet before the film becomes so corporeal, Wasilewski links sexuality and emptiness. The very opening shot features the stalls of the men’s locker room at Kuba’s swimming pool, accompanied by the sound of moaning. There is nothing but sex and anonymous space. Wasilewski uses this void throughout the film, eventually to express the isolated world that Michal and Kuba inhabit. The men are often framed by enormous urban monstrosities, highway and apartment complexes that throw their loneliness into relief against an unfeeling city.

The most striking metaphor for their passion is found in a couple of sequences in a parking garage, stealing moments of intimacy in Michal’s car. Wasilewski places the camera on the dash and drives through the empty concrete structure, accompanied by a throbbing pop song. This is their bliss, in the most hidden environment possible.

Its interruption is inevitable, though perhaps not quite in the way one might expect. Meanwhile, Wasilewski makes sure not to leave Sylwie in the lurch. Michal and Kuba may brush her off and treat her as irrelevant, but she is not portrayed as such. This empathy for the women in the situation, equally victimized by a society that forces men to remain in the closet, is the difference between a small-minded coming out narrative and a real work of art. Thankfully, it is an attribute shared by Tribeca’s other international gay narrative feature, “Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow?”

Will_You_Still_Love_Me_Tomorrow

Other than that, these two films have absolutely nothing in common. Arvin Chen’s follow-up feature to 2010’s “Au Revoir Taipei” is a broad romantic comedy featuring three couples, only one of which is a same-sex pair. The central character is Weichung (Richie Ren), a 30-something optometrist with a wife and young son. He used to be gay, but once he reached a certain age the pressure to settle down was too much and he proposed to Feng (Mavis Fan), a childhood friend. Now his feelings have been re-awakened by a Cantonese flight attendant in need of a good pair of glasses.

Meanwhile, his sister Mandy is engaged to San-San, a somewhat useless romantic. They’re in love but she’s nervous about married life, so she panics and moves back to her old apartment to eat ice cream and watch soap operas. It’s pretty standard romcom fare, as is the final arrangement – the obvious pairing of Feng and her doting young boss. We know from the very beginning how things will turn out.

The subversive element here is its very blandness. The happy ending depends upon the break-up of a marriage, and a marriage that has already produced a child at that. While Chen reinforces the institution with Mandy and San-San, he chooses to undermine it as well by wiling the audience into rooting for Weichung and Feng’s divorce. The trouble this causes Feng does not evaporate under the weight of comedy. In fact, her pain at her husband’s infidelity becomes the stylistic centerpiece of the film in a campy karaoke sequence to the title song by The Shirelles. But that only furthers our desire to see her divorced, and Chen seems to suggest that it will be an outright joyful conclusion, rather than a bittersweet resolution of terrible mistakes.

This is hard to grasp from an American context, the ease with which the Taiwanese context accepts false marriages and the cheer with which it breaks them up. In the same way, the gloomy style of “Floating Skyscrapers” adds another dimension to a story we’ve already seen told by Anglophone films. Now more than ever, we should be looking to international LGBT cinema for new ways to look at genres we think we already know.

Categories: No Categories

Tags: 2013 Tribeca Film Festival, LGBT, TFF2013, Tribeca film festival, WIll You Still Love Me Tomorrow? Floating Skyscrapers

Jumat, 13 September 2013

Exclusive Clip: ‘Shadow Dancer’

For a while there, it was starting to look as though American audiences would never have an opportunity to see James Marsh’s “Shadow Dancer,” despite the fact that the film tore up the festival trail after premiering at last year’s Sundance Film Festival. Film.com’s very own William Goss raved about “Shadow Dancer” from the snowy hills of Park City, writing that Marsh – who made a name for himself with the enormously successful documentaries “Man on Wire” and “Project Nim” – has delivered a superbly suspenseful thriller with his latest foray into the world of narrative filmmaking.

Fortunately for us, “Shadow Dancer” is finally seeing the light of day on our shores, premiering on iTunes earlier today and slated to hit theaters on May 31st.

Starring Clive Owen and “Oblivion”‘s Andrea Riseborough, “Shadow Dancer” is one of the more exciting films of the spring. We’re pleased to present an exclusive clip from the movie, a tense and frothy interrogation scene that should give you a pretty good idea as to what you’re in for with this one. Check it out, and read the film’s synopsis below.

Single mother Collette McVeigh is a Republican living in Belfast with her mother and hardliner IRA brothers. When she is arrested for her part in an aborted IRA bomb plot in London, an MI5 officer (Mac) offers her a choice: lose everything and go to prison for 25 years or return to Belfast to spy on her own family. With her son’s life in her hands, Collette chooses to place her trust in Mac and return home, but when her brothers’ secret operation  is ambushed, suspicions of an informant are raised and Collette finds both herself and her family in grave danger.

Categories: No Categories

Tags: Exclusive Clip, James marsh, Shadow dancer

Rabu, 11 September 2013

Tribeca Review: ‘Taboor’

Taboor_Final_Site

There are films that are challenging and there are films that are off-putting. “Taboor,” an exercise in endurance from Iranian filmmaker Vahid Vakilifar is, unfortunately, in the latter camp. Its prime effort – to remain as obtuse as possible – ultimately tears down what little narrative structure exists. While there is, indeed, a discernible tone, the squared-off shots and spooky sound effects are just not enough to save the picture. I’ll grant Vakilifar that his intentions are artistic, it’s just that there isn’t enough meat on the bone to make suffering through the artifice a worthwhile endeavor.

Meat – sizzling meat, in fact – factors into “Taboor.” At the thirty-minute mark a steak is thrown on a grill and, as we watch it cook in real time, the first of two sequences involving spoken words commences. I hesitate to say dialogue, because it is just an off-screen character offering a smidge of context.

By this point we’ve seen an older man get out of bed in a room with aluminum foil wallpaper. He gets into an aluminum foil suit of armor, then puts his clothes on over this, then gets on a motor scooter to enter a dark city.

He walks through empty, industrial buildings, spraying for bugs. At one point he finds a collapsed person and helps get him to an ambulance. This is when the steak-cooker explains that “exposure” is destroying our nightrider, and soon his skin will begin to blister apart.

He continues his task until dawn, at which point he makes a decision that seems something of a rebuke to Beckett’s quote “You must go on, I can’t go on, I’ll go on.”

Many of the shots are elegantly framed. (And thank God for that, since they go on forever.) There’s a Lynchian-on-paper moment where a dwarf fires a pellet gun down a long hallway at our hero as he wears a bucket on his head. There’s also a lengthy POV sequence of one of those thrill rides where the seat moves and you watch a video screen. (The sole chuckle of the film goes to the ol’ West gold miner within the ride who may or may not be Randy Quaid.)

There are also some “Hearts of Space”-esque experiments in sound design. If you listen very, very closely during a scene in an elevator you can hear Vangelis’ “Love Theme From Blade Runner.” (The producer in me wonders if they have the rights. It’s so, so soft in the background, but I swear on everything I own that it is in there.)

Listen: I love movies that get you in “the Zone.” Say, for example, Andrei Tarkovsky’s “Stalker” (which actually takes place in “the Zone!”) in which a slow, dreamlike haze permeates each scene. Furthermore I respect a movie for sticking to its guns and delivering a very precise vision. “Taboor” is, I’m sure, exactly the movie Vakilifar wanted to make. So, I’m not gonna be that philistine who wants to call bullshit, but I will be discerning in my taste and say that this specific example of narrative-light, mood-heavy filmmaking is just not for me.

I came away from “Taboor” feeling blank. Blank and a little sleepy. I spoke with a person who liked it on the grounds that it was an interesting look at a post-apocalyptic world. There’s nothing in the text to definitively state that it is a post-apocalyptic world. Who is to say there isn’t a nutty nighttime exterminator out there wearing aluminum foil? My ultimate position is this: there are plenty of rewarding but “difficult” films in the world worth challenging yourself to watch. This isn’t one of them.

SCORE: 3.5 / 10

Categories: Reviews

Tags: 2013 Tribeca Film Festival, Iran, Taboor, Vahid Vakilifar

Senin, 09 September 2013

The Out Take: ‘Portrait of Jason’ and the Genesis of Queer Cinema

20138177_2_IMG_FIX_700x700

“The Out Take,” is a bi-weekly column dedicated to queer cinema.

In the beginning, there was Jason. Biblical metaphors are often somewhat trite and they haven’t always been friendly to the LGBT community, but in this case I think it’s more than warranted. Shirley Clarke’s “Portrait of Jason” is foundational in the grandest of terms. Like that opening verse of The Gospel of John, Jason Holiday’s testament feels like The Word, an origin moment for independent queer storytelling in cinema. And, like the first verses of Genesis, this brilliantly simple documentary feels like a series of creation acts. Jason’s honesty, defiant yet vulnerable, introduces just about every major theme that LGBT filmmakers have worked with ever since. To finish off this indulgent introduction with Whitman, Clarke’s revelatory documentary “contains multitudes.”

But first, what is “Portrait of Jason”? In late 1966 Shirley Clarke sat down with Jason Holiday, a 33-year old hustler. She interviewed him for twelve hours about his life, shying away from nothing. She asks about his family, his lovers, and his long career as a jack-of-all-trades, especially the under-the-table ones. Jason’s honesty is both defiant and vulnerable, and almost impossibly informative. He’s seen everything, been everywhere, met everyone. “I’ve been balling from Maine to Mexico,” he quips, “but I haven’t got a dollar to show for it.” He’s been a maid, a houseboy, anything to get by and avoid the humdrum 9 to 5. His life story is a kaleidoscope of the pre-Stonewall gay experience.

That’s right, pre-Stonewall. Let’s take a second to muse on that. This is 1966. That Clarke had the audacity to make a film on one of society’s most charismatic outcasts is impressive enough. That the resulting film is such an expansive collection of the ideas, themes and identities of queer art is downright miraculous. And, without fail, all of this extraordinary text is still relevant today.

“Portrait of Jason” begins with identity. “My name is Jason Holiday…My name is Aaron Payne.” The latter was Jason’s birth name, one which didn’t fit. Later on in life, in San Francisco, he was given the opportunity of a fresh start. “Jason Holiday was created in San Francisco. And San Francisco is a place to be created, believe me,” he explains. When you spend your early life being told not to be yourself, sometimes the best way out is to create a new self altogether. This comes up all over the place in queer cinema, running the gamut from Charles Busch’s “Die Mommie Die!” to the bewildering re-namings of Pedro Almodóvar’s “Bad Education.”

This radical way of retaking control is only the first step in a long journey through an irrepressibly fluid life. Jason has been a maid/butler for countless rich older women, most of them white. He embodies the classic duality of the servant’s role: docile on the surface but quick-witted and satirical when out of sight. His wisdom in matters of society and sexuality comes from having witnessed everything, or almost everything.

Meanwhile, his many sexual and domestic experiences with men across the country complement his wise knowledge of femininity. He is the wise outcast that knows everything, an empowering archetype of marginalized LGBT culture. As the years go on this trope may have gotten more magical, with characters like Jack Fairy in “Velvet Goldmine” and five Roses in “Laurence Anyways,” but the root is there.

In spite of all of this resourcefulness, however, there remains a real vulnerability. Clarke makes sure to sprinkle these more tender moments throughout the film, rather than solidly landing on Jason’s weaknesses with a thud. “I just want to be straight,” he lets slip. Another confession follows, “I’ve never, since I left home, really lived anywhere.” This unlikely combination of sheer charisma and raw frailty is at the essence of many a gay cultural emblem, from Judy Garland and the real queens of “Paris is Burning” to Julianne Moore’s roles in Todd Haynes’s “Safe” and “Far from Heaven.”

6390c_Portrait-of-Jason-20110801-151754-large

And, as Garland’s example illustrates, this conflict is often resolved through the act of performance. Jason’s spirited impersonations of Mae West and Butterfly McQueen are the most obvious example, allowing him to escape into a less conflicted character for a short while. Yet in many ways he is always performing, constantly shifting personas. In one moment he’s coy, insisting “I’ll never tell.” The next moment he’s the lush: “One more drink, I’ll tell all.” Later in the film, discussing his dreams of a cabaret act, he boasts that he could “play all the parts.”

Performance is perhaps the ultimate conduit of queer fluidity. Where can we still find that today? Forty-seven years after Clarke sat down with Jason, we’ve found ourselves in a precarious position. As the LGBT community (mostly the LG bit) becomes more accepted by the mainstream, from Hollywood to Middle America, reinventing ourselves seems less important. If we fit into the new idea of the modern family seamlessly, why would we bother to change our names, wander the country without aim and get dressed up like Dorothy Dandridge?

Well, it’s complicated. On the one hand, the community of transgender artists knows that in many ways this is old hat. Cabaret genius Justin Vivian Bond, for example, has moved beyond the gender binary altogether. Internationally, filmmakers like Almodóvar, Dolan, Sally Potter, and Apichatpong Weerasethakul get it. On cable TV there’s one notable outlier, “RuPaul’s Drag Race.” The show embraces the fluidity, emphasizes reinvention and taking control of your own narrative, and champions transgender characters and the irrelevance of traditional gender norms. Yet, while I’d argue that RuPaul is one of the most positive influences currently working in American culture, is that enough?

When it comes to the American mainstream, this fluidity seems to actually be on the wane in representations of queer characters. Hollywood is building a world for Aaron Payne, but doesn’t seem interested in Jason Holiday. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not necessarily a bad thing that gay kids across the country are being told that it’s ok to be who they are. But doesn’t it miss the point to not also say “Be whoever you want to be”?

“Portrait of Jason” is currently playing at The IFC Center in Manhattan.

Categories: Columns

Tags: LGBT Cinema, Portrait of Jason, The Out Take

Sabtu, 07 September 2013

Review: ‘The Big Wedding’

the-big-wedding-1

It would be difficult to claim “The Big Wedding” was a good movie, as it’s so clearly not, but it is at least an interesting movie. This year’s version of “Country Strong,” another film that bewildered simply as a matter of doing business, a bad idea that somehow everyone fully committed to throughout, to the film’s credit … and detriment. “The Big Wedding” is the rare example of a film that had to have been a tonal mystery to everyone involved for the entire process of scripting, shooting, and editing. The lingering issue? They never managed to crack the case.

“The Big Wedding” starts off wrong-footed from the get-go, murdering any potential momentum. A lady character is introduced, she has nausea and doesn’t drink (could be pregnant, what!!??) then we get to hear about a 29-year-old virgin, a storyline implausible enough to be ripped from a sketch comedy exercise where the people on stage have to work with a word the audience has thrown out. “Virgin!” Umm, okay, I guess we’ll muddle through this, but c’mon, who are we kidding here? It’s impossible to do this with any element of comedic timing because there’s no comedy left to wring out of the lifeless trope. But I’ve already fast-forwarded too far into the piece, because the actual very first scene is a voiceover from Robert DeNiro. It’s gonna be a bumpy night.

“The Big Wedding” is incredibly raunchy. I deliberately avoid the word “bawdy” because that description evokes the connotation that there’s something adult or artsy happening here, “Moulin Rouge” style, but this is not at all the case. Ten F-Bombs (I counted! Because what else was I supposed to be doing?) are sprinkled throughout the film, including amazing sentences constructed completely around curse words in rapid succession, the sort of dialogue you don’t see much outside of the long-haul truck industry. This wouldn’t be so out of place if this wasn’t a movie bathed in the luminous bright lights and sentimentality of wedding tradition. Where the expectation is something along the lines of “Rachel Getting Married” or “Four Weddings and Funeral,” the actuality is more akin to “American Pie” meets “As Good as it Gets” mixed with a dash of “Just Go with It”. If those descriptors seem disparate, or off-kilter, that’s precisely what “The Big Wedding” is, a bit like walking in on your parents, wearing swim caps, rocking out to this anthem in their bedroom:

Now then, it’s not as though agism is the watchword of the day, or that older folks shouldn’t have active and vibrant sex lives, it’s more that I’m not sure why any of this is happening at all – themes and scenes are thrown around willy nilly, as if “The Big Wedding” can fluidly switch between genres without a structural collapse, rampant sexuality painted against a backdrop of familial love and understanding, personal growth attained on the back of jokes about acts of oral pleasure. Confounding, this is “The Big Wedding”. It is a shocker that it was even made, and a bigger shock that anyone involved could have thought “nailed it!” Something was nailed, but “it” was awkwardness and confusion, not narrative.

As to that narrative, for the morbidly curious, here you are: The adopted son of divorced couple Don and Ellie, Alejandro (Ben Barnes), is to be married over the weekend. Divorcee Don’s new squeeze is Bebe, though Ellie and Bebe clearly have a previous fondness for each other. Lyla (Katherine Heigl) and Jared (Topher Grace) are Don and Ellie’s other children, also scheduled to attend the wedding. Father Moinighan (Robin Williams) is there to provide counsel to the new couple. Alejandro’s fiancee is named Missy (Amanda Seyfried) and her parents are super racist, they don’t want her to marry Alejandro because he is not lily white. This, amazingly, is not the problem that needs to be dealt with.

The real problem is Alejandro’s biological mother, Madonna (Patricia Rae) is coming into town to see her only son get married, only, as a devout Catholic, she frowns greatly upon divorce. Thus, long-divorced couple Don and Ellie must pretend they are married, for the sake of Alejandro, to the great chagrin of current beau Bebe, all while Lyla and Jared deal with various issues ranging from breakups to trying to hook up with Alejandro’s biological sister, Nuria (Ana Ayora) though of course technically speaking Jared would then be pursuing the sister of his brother. Ahem. Weird subplots aside, the “let’s pretend to be something so as not to offend someone” plot-line was first discovered by the Incas, and you’ve probably also seen it in works ranging from Shakespeare to Archie Comics. No, it’s not the most innovative plot device, though everything they put around the device is innovative, but only in that it’s impossible to figure out what is happening, as if you’re watching the manic fight scene from “Crazy, Stupid, Love” for an entire movie.

Dings firmly in mind, silly cursing juxtaposed against “I love you speeches” and Topher Grace pining for carnal knowledge, what made the film interesting, and perhaps, gulp, worth a watch (if you’re the intrepid sort of cinematic fan who occasionally doses him or herself with pain)?

The list starts and almost ends with Susan Sarandon, she’s the primary reason any of this works on some level. Conversely, Diane Keaton’s character, Ellie, is really just her Diane Keaton’ing all over the place. Same goes for Robert DeNiro, who stars as Robert DeNiro, though everyone onscreen calls him Don for some odd reason. Admittedly, Susan Sarandon may be pulling off the same thing, dipping into her inherent mutable loveliness, but without the believability Sarandon brings to the wobbly material this would have been a laugh out loud endeavor, only for all the wrong reasons. Sarandon is asked to play a husband-stealer, a stepmom, a best friend, an embattled and bitter girlfriend waiting for her man to put a ring on it, a caterer, and finally, mercifully, a forgiving angel. This, obviously, should be impossible, but like a jungle cat moonwalking through a fiery hoop, she manages to pull it off.

Any rational person would have bet against efficacy, given those long odds, but that’s why we play the games, eh? It should also be ceded that all of the actors involved tried extremely hard, Katherine Heigl (as Lyla) is likable for the first time in years, Amanda Seyfried continues her dogged pursuit for the title of America’s Sweetheart, and Robin Williams tones it down enough to be palatable in his limited role as Father Moinighan, though by my count this is the 77th time he’s appeared as the wacky, yet gentle, preacher type. Hell, even Topher Grace’s nod toward the impossible virgin stereotype is filled with something approximating heart, though it’s mostly the type of heart you see filtered through a seven-layer cornball bean dip. Still, everyone was up for it, wackadoo lines were delivered with precision, and many of the scenes feature something memorable (if not exactly coherent).

What’s it all add up to? What’s the final verdict on a film that’s too busy twitching in the corner for any real level of introspection? Well, If you placed a rabid raccoon into a sleeping cat and then hit the fire alarm, you’d capture the vibe of “The Big Wedding”. It’s a film without any true concept of what it is, or what it was trying to accomplish.

Grade: 5.5 / 10

Laremy wrote the book on film criticism and took an awful long time thinking up that cat/raccoon analogy.

Categories: Reviews

Tags: Amanda seyfried, Laremy legel, Review, Susan Sarandon, The Big Wedding

Jumat, 06 September 2013

DEEP DARK CANYON (2013)

DEEP DARK CANYON (2013)

Tanggal Rilis : 23 April 2013 (USA)
Jenis Film : Action | Drama | Thriller
Diperankan Oleh : Ted Levine, Spencer Treat Clark, Nick Eversman

Ringkasan Cerita DEEP DARK CANYON (2013) :

Bloom Towne is a small-town sheriff under the thumb of the well-established, deeply influential Mayor Dick Cavanaugh’s family. When Bloom’s two teenage sons, Nate and Skylar accidentally shoot and kill Dick during a deer-hunt, Bloom’s long-held allegiance to the reigning Cavanaugh clan is tested. Skylar (still a minor) decides to take the wrap for his older brother Nate, claiming he fired the fatal shot.

The Cavanaugh family’s quick retaliation sends Skylar on his way to county jail, soon to be tried as an adult. Desperate and guilt-ridden, Nate breaks Skylar out of jail and sets off a chain of lawless acts, which send them deep into the woods and on the run. Bloom’s choice between the law and his sons leads to revelations of old family secrets that threaten to destroy everything he loves.

[IMDb rating : 5.8/10]
[Awards : - ]
[Production Co : Colorfast Pictures, Secret Identity Productions]
[IMDb link : www.imdb.com/title/tt1646212]

[Quality : WEB-DL 720p]
[File Size : 525 MB]
[Format : Matroska >> mkv]
[Resolution : 1280x530]
[Source : 720p.WEB-DL.X264-WEBiOS]
[Encoder : nItRo]

BillionUploads
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Megaload
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Uppit
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
Zippyshare
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders
======================================
180upload
| Part1 | Part2 | Part3 | Part4 |
Join with HJ-Split, Download HJ-Split
Credit to original uploaders

Download English Subtitle (Muxed)
Download Indonesian Subtitle (Not available yet)

Watch this Full Movie with High Quality Streaming

Bagi Pengunjung Baru klik di sini Cara Menggabungkan File Ekstensi .001 dan .002


( klik " Like " Dan " +1 " jika kamu suka Film ini )