Tampilkan postingan dengan label Steven. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Steven. Tampilkan semua postingan

Sabtu, 19 Januari 2013

Top 5/Bottom 5: Steven Soderbergh’s Movies

Eric D. Snider January 14, 2013


Steven Soderbergh celebrated his 26th birthday on Jan. 14, 1989, a few days before his first feature, “sex, lies, and videotape,” premiered at the Sundance Film Festival, launching his career and ushering in a new era of independent film. In the intervening 24 years, he’s made 24 more films, ranging from crowd-pleasing heist comedies to esoteric experiments, from biopics to whatever “Magic Mike” was. He occasionally writes his own screenplays, usually acts as his own cinematographer (under the pseudonym Peter Andrews) and often serves as editor (as Mary Ann Bernard). Sometimes he’ll release two movies in one year; once this resulted in him competing against himself for Best Director at the Academy Awards. (He won.)


The busy man turns 50 today, marking the point at which he’s said he intends to retire (or at least take a “hiatus”) from filmmaking. It remains to be seen whether he’ll go through with it. His pharmaceutical thriller “Side Effects” hits theaters next month, followed by his Liberace biopic “Behind the Candelabra” on HBO in the spring. And after that? In case there is no “after that,” we’ll take his half-century mark as an occasion to rank his five best films. And since it’s always good to give a birthday boy a little razzing, we’ll include the bottom five, too.


Top 5:


1. ‘The Limey’ (1999)
This hard-boiled thriller about a British thug investigating the death of his daughter in Los Angeles isn’t just marvelously entertaining, with an engrossing, twisty plot and an unforgettable lead performance by Terence Stamp. It’s also a prime example of Soderbergh’s gift for bringing artsy, inventive flourishes to mainstream products. In his hands, what could have been an ordinary crime drama is elevated to the status of minor classic.


2. ‘Traffic’ (2000)
Soderbergh’s one and only Oscar (so far) was for directing this sprawling, multifaceted look at the war on drugs. (It also won for its editing, screenplay, and for Benicio Del Toro’s supporting performance.) Loosely adapted from a British miniseries, “Traffic” was a box office hit as well as a critical darling, and it paved the way for HBO’s “The Wire.”


3. ‘Out of Sight’ (1998)
The director’s fascination with crime was never sexier than in this adaptation of an Elmore Leonard novel about a suave bank robber (played by George Clooney in the first of his six collaborations with Soderbergh) who develops a mutual attraction with a U.S. marshal (Jennifer Lopez). Coolly seductive and playful, the movie thrives on the chemistry between its stars and on Soderbergh’s effortless ability to inject personality into a potboiler.


4. ‘Ocean’s Eleven’ (2001)
It’s his biggest commercial success to date ($183 million in the U.S., $451 million worldwide); it’s a remake; and it inspired two sequels. The man who was once the face of indie filmmaking went Hollywood here — and guess what? He proved as adept at popcorn fluff as he is at more thoughtful fare. Boasting a huge, charismatic cast — Clooney! Pitt! Damon! Roberts! — this is one of the rare remakes that improves on the original, a sleek, jaunty heist caper that demonstrates how much fun you can have making a movie.


5. ‘The Informant!‘ (2009)
It was another eight years before Soderbergh exhibited the kind of playfulness that made “Ocean’s Eleven” a hit, and while “The Informant!” didn’t do nearly as well, it’s even loopier and more creative. Matt Damon shines as a naive, talkative corporate whistle-blower, surrounded by a funny supporting cast and buoyed by a kitschy Marvin Hamlisch musical score. Just when you think you know where it’s going, Soderbergh takes you down a different path (the true story it’s based on is equally bizarre), providing an odd, provocative character study.


Bottom 5:


1. ‘Full Frontal’ (2002)
Soderbergh had experimented before, and he’d made a film with a large all-star cast. In “Full Frontal,” he combined the two, and man, what a wreck. Semi-improvised by actors who clearly were not adept at improvisation, this tedious, navel-gazing rumination about Hollywood is almost insufferable.


2. ‘Kafka’ (1991)
Talented though he is, Soderbergh was not immune to the sophomore slump. His follow-up to “sex, lies, and videotape” was this strange mystery that’s partly an adaptation of Franz Kafka’s fiction and partly a biography of him. Yet even here, in a misfire, Soderbergh’s talent shone through. Vincent Canby was not alone among critics in calling it “a very bad well-directed movie.”


3. ‘The Underneath’ (1995)
Remaking the 1949 film noir “Criss Cross,” Soderbergh showed that there’s only so much a good director can do with a weak screenplay (which he co-wrote) and formulaic material.


4. ‘Schizopolis’ (1996)
Soderbergh has never been more eccentric, more self-indulgent and more fascinatingly off-target than in this absurd, non-linear experiment in which he also starred. You can admire his boldness, and occasionally laugh at the gags, but this mostly comes off as a juvenile embarrassment.


5. ‘Ocean’s Twelve’ (2004)
Having scored a critical, commercial and artistic success with “Ocean’s Eleven,” Soderbergh here fell victim to a common Hollywood trap: trying to do it again without realizing what made it work the first time. “Ocean’s Twelve” isn’t a terrible movie, but it wastes many of its cast members, introduces too many new ones, takes the action out of Las Vegas and generally reeks of indulgence.

Categories: Lists

Tags: Behind the Candelabra, benicio del toro, brad pitt, channing tatum, Elmore Leonard, Full Frontal, george clooney, jennifer lopez, julia roberts, Kafka, Magic Mike, matt damon, Ocean's Eleven, Ocean's Twelve, Out of Sight, Schizopolis, sex lies and videotape, Side Effects, steven soderbergh, Terence Stamp, the informant!, the limey, The Underneath, Top 5/Bottom 5, traffic, Magic Mike, Out of Sight, Traffic, George Clooney, Steven Soderbergh, Brad Pitt, Matt Damon, Jennifer Lopez, Side Effects, sex, lies, and videotape, Behind the Candelabra, The Limey, Ocean's Eleven, The Informant, Full Frontal, Kafka, The Underneath, Schizopolis, Ocean's Twelve, Terence Stamp, Benicio Del Toro, Julia Roberts Previous article Lessons Learned at the 2013 Golden Globes Next article Movies Streaming/On Demand This Week: ‘Taken 2,’ ‘Paranormal Activity 4' & More

Jumat, 09 November 2012

Ranking Steven Spielberg’s Movies

We in rarified cineaste circles are educated enough to search out movies based on things like who wrote it, who lensed it or, in most cases, who is the director. Among the unwashed, choices are made predominately by which movie stars are on the poster or what’s playing at the moment they drag their sorry asses from the Wendy’s to the multiplex.

Historically, there have been few film directors whose name above the title could get mass quantities of butts in seats. Hitchcock was one; Steven Spielberg is another.

What’s so interesting about Spielberg is that his resume is, indeed, diverse. He may be best known for his gripping, family-friendly adventures, but he’s made excellent serious dramas, light comedies and thrillers pushed right to the edge of horror. With the imminent release of “Lincoln” (don’t see it in the side balcony, whatever you do), now seems the right time to rate Steven Spielberg’s films from worst to best.

Note, we’re going with theatrical features here – not his “Twilight Zone” segment, TV work or the producer credits he’s closely associated with. And, until Tobe Hooper goes before Congress to admit he didn’t direct “Poltergeist,” we’re not counting that either.

27. “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull” (2008)
We’re going to start this list with a handful of bad films, but only one that is a true abomination. Every single enraged Internet fanboy is correct: this movie is a travesty.

It takes something we love – one of the greatest icons in all of fiction – and blanches it of everything that made it worthwhile. The plot is dopey, the side characters are annoying, Shia LaBeouf is Shia LaBeouf. It’s just inexcusable.

Luckily, we have a nice scapegoat. This wasn’t Steven’s idea. This is all George Lucas’s fault. Now he’s retired, and we’ll never have to worry about him bothering us again. “Crystal Skull” happened, we’ve dealt with it and now it’s time to move on.

26. “The Terminal” (2004)
Which way to the bar?

Yeah, yeah, we know there really was some guy who was stuck at a French airport under slightly similar conditions, but when your lead character’s big triumph is building a bathroom for Catherine Zeta-Jones? That’s a problematic film.

A big stink was made about how cool the set was, that it looked like a real airport. Great, just the place we want to be stuck for two hours.

25. “Hook” (1991)
There was a time, dear reader, when Robin Williams was cool. Not just cool, but underground and edgy. That slowly began to change … just around 1991.

“Hook” was a revelation. Not everything Spielberg made was good! It seemed like a perfect match: Spielberg does a Disney classic, but modernized and with the top talent (Williams, Dustin Hoffman and Julia Roberts). And lo and behold – it sucked. It looked … cheap? The set looked like a set. Maybe this was some sort of twisted homage to Fantasyland, but how could a director who was able to sell us on a spaceship hovering over a truck by just dangling a few lights make something that looked like this?

“Hook” still made a billion dollars, but how? The movie makes no sense. Why does Peter Pan have an American accent? And how did he just “forget” his childhood? And Rufio? Don’t get us started on Rufio.

War Horse24. “War Horse” (2011)
More like snore horse.

Maybe “War Horse” works better on the stage, but it was hard to take scenes like Tom Hiddleston sketching horsies seriously. We get it. They love horses! They’re horse crazy in this war! When things are at its lowest, when you’re supposed to be crying for War Horse because he’s being shoved around and he’s carrying guns or whatever, it’s so tempting to yell out, “Why the long face!?!”

The scene toward the end, when the opposing soldiers work together to help War Horse, actually has some gravitas, but they should have left this horse on Broadway.

23. “Always” (1989)
Be honest. You kinda forgot about this one.

“Always” is a modernization of a 1943 Spencer Tracy film called “A Guy Named Joe.” Spielberg and lead actor Richard Dreyfuss really, really loved that one, and by 1989 movie studios were just chucking cash at Spielberg and telling him to make whatever the hell he wanted. “Always” is a decent enough light romantic drama with a dash of magical realism, something of a “Ghost” meets “Heaven Can Wait” set among firefighting pilots. It’s hokey as hell, but the cast (Holly Hunter, John Goodman and Audrey Hepburn, in addition to Dreyfuss) pretty much makes it work. If you are a completionist, you should see it, but bring some wine for its cheese.

22. “The Sugarland Express” (1974)
Somewhere between “Bonnie and Clyde” and “Raising Arizona” lies “The Sugarland Express.”

You don’t really think of Steven Spielberg being a 1970s provocateur, but this one has all the signifiers of youth culture revolt found in classics like “Badlands” or “Two-Lane Blacktop.” William Atherton and Goldie Hawn are outlaws with a hostage riding through Texas, with only their love to keep them sane. The law and the media are hot on their tale. Don’t worry, though; this isn’t too outside of Spielberg’s later family-friendly persona. Hawn busts Atherton out of prison in the hopes of rescuing their baby from mean foster parents. Awwww.

And it’s based on a true story.

21. “Duel” (1971)
Imagine “Jaws,” but instead of a shark … it’s a truck!

Okay, that’s the worst pitch ever, but it’s a rather effective and simple grindhouse-y effort from Spielberg, and it’s his first TV movie that was later expanded for a theatrical release. A man in the midst of white-collar crisis comes face to face with a brutality he can’t explain: namely, a rusty diesel truck determined to kill … Kill … KILL! It’s as goofy as it sounds, but once you buy into its nightmare terror it works, and the action is shot quite well. “Duel” is based on a Richard Matheson story and no dumber than “Mad Max,” which would come out eight years later.

20. “Catch Me If You Can” (2002)
After a string of very heavy films, Spielberg reversed course and gave us the closest thing to a lighthearted romp on his resume.

“Catch Me If You Can” is a fun, juicy and true yarn about a serial con artist living it up during the jet age. It was a perfect vehicle for Leonardo DiCaprio, and audiences ate it up. (It made, roughly, nine bazillion dollars.) Spielberg’s gotta hit those emotional beats, though, so Christopher Walken’s unique portrayal as the loving but disappointed father was something of a creative lift for a guy that had been wallowing in indie tough guy walk-ons for a few too many years. This is the only Spielberg film to inspire a Broadway musical, which is a shame because who wouldn’t want to see an all-singing, all-dancing “Jaws”?

19. “1941? (1979)
This is erroneously thought of as Spielberg’s first flop. It wasn’t. It did good business, but it was not quite the capper to the “Jaws/Close Encounters” trifecta that shareholders were hoping for. A broad comedy about wacky Southern California in the aftermath of Pearl Harbor, “1941? is oftentimes dismissed as a mess. It is rambunctious to say the least, but its chaos has great charm. Supposedly, Stanley Kubrick said he liked the picture but thought it worked better as a drama.

“1941? is a collection of loud, slapstick-y set pieces that, at times, dabble in poor taste. Some of the jokes are just flat-out racist, and not in a we’re-in-on-the-joke “Harold and Kumar” way. It also suffers from some of its association with the “National Lampoon”/Second City players like Belushi, Aykroyd and Candy. It’s too bad, because on its own terms the story of American society ripping itself apart with jingoistic paranoia is quite underexplored. If you’ve been avoiding it, check it out. There’s much about it that isn’t Spielberg-y and plenty that just isn’t funny, but there are some fine guffaws in there as well. Bonus points for Eddie Deezan, too.

18. “The Adventures of Tintin” (2011)
Spielberg managed to avoid the uncanny valley in this gorgeous 3D animated film based on the books by HergĂ©. In addition to the stunning final sequence, there’s simply no shortage of nice, painterly moments throughout the entire movie. It is energetic and funny, and kids love it. Hopefully, we’ll see more Tintin in the future.

The Color Purple17. “The Color Purple” (1985)
This was a major step for Spielberg, leaving the safety of popcorn-munching fun and entering the world of Important Drama.

Spielberg’s adaptation of Alice Walker’s Jim Crow-era novel could not have had more heat on it, coming as it did during the apex of Spielberg’s success. It paid off, though, earning close to $150 million on a $15 million budget. By all rights, this was a major success and launched both Whoopi Goldberg and Oprah Winfrey into the national spotlight.

It is important to recognize that African-American women were significantly less visible in mainstream culture as recently as 1985, so “The Color Purple” was a real landmark. It’s an emotional film — we dare you not to get misty-eyed at the end! — and gorgeously shot. It may go full soap opera now and again, but it makes the most of its sentimentality.

16. “A.I. Artificial Intelligence” (2001)
To a hardcore film lover, it’s somewhat impossible to just take this film in on its own terms because of its backstory. “A.I.,” of course, was a project long in development by Stanley Kubrick; Spielberg inherited it after Kubrick’s death and dedicated the film to him, and there are moments where you can kinda see the Kubrick in there. Then there are moments when it is pure Spielberg. And then there are moments when the movie just drags.

Credit where it’s due: it looks great, and it absolutely sticks to its guns. Much like David waiting at the bottom of the sea for centuries to find his programmed happiness, “A.I.” has almost a nightmarish stream-of-consciousness to its narrative. Despite its terrific design, it is, alas, a more interesting movie to think and talk about than to actually see.

15. “The Lost World: Jurassic Park” (1997)
Steven Spielberg walked away from “Jaws 2,” but for some reason he felt compelled to take a second trip to Jurassic Park.

The result is a fine adventure film, but something of a pointless one. There are great moments, and the “Godzilla”-inspired conclusion in San Diego is tremendous, but it basically feels like a retread.

14. “Minority Report” (2002)
Spielberg stayed with sci-fi after “A.I.” but went from wistfully tragic to full dystopia. Taking the kernel of an idea from a Philip K. Dick short story (perhaps the best way to adapt Philip K. Dick?), “Minority Report” is a nice, mind-scrambling way to discuss lofty topics like ethics and predestination, but it also wastes no opportunity to slide groovy computer interfaces all over the screen.

“Minority Report” is by no means the most memorable film in Spielberg’s repertoire, but it may be among his most influential in terms of design. No slick television commercial has been the same since Tom Cruise got up and turned a wall into an interactive touch screen.

13. “Empire of the Sun” (1987)
With his “Amazing Stories” cranking away on network television to scratch his broad entertainment itch, Spielberg continued working in historical drama after “The Color Purple.” His follow-up, “Empire of the Sun,” is the most underrated film on his resume.

Young Christian Bale plays a child of a wealthy British family in China at the outset of the Second World War. He is separated from his parents during a harrowing mad rush sequence (think “Home Alone 2? but on some tainted steroids) and he ends up in hiding. Eventually he is caught and lives in an internment camp. Here he meets an American pilot (John Malkovich) and, y’know, learns a lot of life lessons. You really should check it out.

Bonus points: The film is based on wacked-out sci-fi author J.G. Ballard’s autobiography. This is a good piece of bar trivia knowledge if you want to outdo someone talking about “Minority Report” and Philip K. Dick.

Saving Private Ryan12. “Saving Private Ryan” (1998)
By 1998, Spielberg was firmly established as the director of big social issue films. In “Saving Private Ryan,” Spielberg returned to shootin’ Nazis, but this time took it seriously. This salute to the bravery of “The Greatest Generation” was ready-made for the echo chamber of talk shows, a flag-wrapped gift to patriots and grateful citizens. Underneath it all, however, it was an opportunity for Spielberg to rattle audiences with nonstop sequences of pure, cutting-edge cinema. Strip away the sentiment – is the action in “Saving Private Ryan” that different from “War of the Worlds”?

What it has in its favor are a number of great characters (and so many future stars!) all taking classic WWII film roles and tweaking them a little bit. There are soldiers who win the day and some who simply fall to bad luck. Rarely have moments of cowardice as well as bravery been shown in such a sympathetic light. “Saving Private Ryan” is more complex that its poster leads you to believe. It does, however, get a wee bit repetitive upon second viewing.

11. “Amistad” (1997)
After “Schindler’s List,” Spielberg felt compelled to once again shine a light on one of humanity’s great sins. “Amistad” is ostensibly a courtroom drama, but it uses this as a springboard to become one of the great onscreen indictments of slavery.

The flashback sequence of the Middle Passage shows Spielberg using all of his inimitable skills for a nobler purpose. The scenes dazzle but are sickening in their brutality. Similar to “Schindler’s List,” there is the Righteous Man character (Anthony Hopkins’s John Quincy Adams), but the trial hook with Djimon Hounsou’s character Cinque gives us an opportunity to see the institution of slavery and the experience of Africans in the New World from the inside out.

“Amistad” did not lose money, but it was Spielberg’s least profitable film.

10. “War of the Worlds” (2005)
Spielberg took an old British property and, four years after the fact, made the best film about 9/11. It has no politics, just terror. Using all his powers of audience manipulation, the feeling of dread and confusion is grafted onto something clearly make-believe, allowing us to purge any unspent feelings concerning the still-unbelievable catastrophe.

The story itself is fine enough. Maybe we linger in Tim Robbins’s basement too long, maybe H.G. Wells’s ending is anticlimactic and, in retrospect, Dakota Fanning is a little like a cleaned-up Honey Boo Boo. For sheer nightmare cinema, though, “War of the Worlds” is almost unmatched.

9. “Jurassic Park” (1993)
We know what redemption looks like: the gaping, jagged mouth of an angry Tyrannosaurus rex.

Hot on the heels of “Hook,” Spielberg fired back with what was, essentially, his follow-up to “Jaws.” Spielberg takes Michael Crichton’s clever and even satirical concepts, winds ‘em up and sets ‘em loose for a thrill ride that swallowed movie audiences whole.

“Jurassic Park” is great because it is simple (heck, it’s not that different from “KISS Meets the Phantom of the Park”), and this purity of essence affords Spielberg ample opportunity to knock out a series of home run action sequences. It’s also the movie that pushed the idea of the “Spielberg Face” past the point of subconscious device to near-parody.

8. “Schindler’s List” (1993)
If there’s any criticism for “Schindler’s List,” it’s that Spielberg somehow manages to take one of mankind’s lowest moments and, in the very end, make it just a little bit upbeat. It’s a celebration of Oskar Schindler who risked his livelihood and his life to do the ethical thing; it’s a true story, it’s a good story, but it is very much the exception to the rule. For a filmmaker like Spielberg to just sink his camera into the abyss of the Holocaust and show nothing but despair would simply break audiences. (By the way, you can see that movie: Tim Blake Nelson’s “The Grey Zone” from 2001 is one of the most stirring narrative film about this topic ever made.)

Step back, though, and “Schindler’s List” still offers some cinematic riches. The design is astounding, and the lead performances are striking. John Williams’s score has been rightly canonized and, while this isn’t a gory film, it pulls few punches. Spielberg set out to make the film about how an advanced and noble culture could descent into sickening, calculated, tribal depravity and, by all rights, he got the job done.

Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade7. “Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade” (1989)
Oh, to be a fly on the wall for this pitch meeting. There’s Spielberg and George Lucas on their aircraft carrier-sized yacht, spit-balling ideas for the next Indy film. We should do the Holy Grail. Great! We should meet Indy’s father. Super! And he’ll be…

Yes, getting Sean Connery as Papa Jones was a casting coup that may be unmatched in cinema. The decision to make him a bit of a dweeb was even better. (But not that dweeby — there is that awkward moment concerning the very Jonesaphilic Alison Doody.)

It’s hard to choose between “The Last Crusade” and “Temple of Doom.” The camaraderie of the characters in this film is one of the best things in the franchise, but while many of the set pieces are stellar (the whole ending is astounding), some of the earlier sequences are merely great, not blinding perfection.

6. “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom” (1984)
This one is just a wisp above “Last Crusade” for one key, liquidy reason: eyeball soup!!!!

Just try to imagine being 10 and hearing about the highlights from lucky kids who’d already seen “Temple of Doom.” Eyeball soup. A guy rips some other guy’s heart out while he’s still alive, and then he gets thrown into a pit of fire. A secret room with bugs and a lever you need to pull with scorpions around it. A snake served for dinner that, when you slice it open, there are more snakes inside. And did we mention eyeball soup!?!

It’s easy to see “Temple of Doom” for all its ridiculousness now, but the very “bigness” of this idiotic tale is stitched together with such panache that even an adult with no sentimentality will buy it. Plus, “Very funny, Dr. Jones” is a dynamite catch phrase.

5. “E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial” (1982)
What, are we monsters? Why isn’t “E.T.” ranked higher on the list?

It’s just that we’re getting to a point where we have a number of nearly flawless movies, all almost tied with one another. We don’t do these lists for chumps, we do them for directors who kinda sorta know what they’re doing, and what they’re doing is making a lot of good films.

“E.T.” is most remarkable because it hits so many emotional buttons. It is scary, funny, triumphant and, let’s not forget, sad, sad, sad. (If you’ll allow me some nostalgia, I was just under eight years old when this movie came out. Saw it in the theaters a number of times. Kids at that age can get pretty ruthless around boys who cry, but everyone recognized that all bets are off when it came to “E.T.”  I distinctly remember a rained-out day at summer camp when we all went to see “E.T.” Everyone had, of course, already seen it a number of times, and there was discussion about the parts where you are “supposed to cry.” For 1982, that’s pretty progressive. Spielberg was emancipating our emotions at a very young age.)

4. “Munich” (2005)
Hold the phone here. Are we really placing “Munich” this high up? We’re in masterpiece territory here.

Indeed, you’d better just accept it. If “Munich” teaches us anything, it’s that when someone is intractable, confrontation just leads to escalation.

“Munich” is one of the richest investigations into the nature of human conflict. Half the time it comes across as blatant pamphleteering for pacifism, and then it will switch gears and act as a call to arms. In addition to that, it is exciting! With this many assassinations, it is a real action pressure cooker, loaded with great location photography and period jackets.

“Munich” is a 99% perfect film. The mid-coitus slow-motion flashback with haunting music is just a tad overdone, even with the severity of the topic. When the sweat flies off Eric Bana’s forehead … no. Just no.

Close Encounters of the Third Kind3. “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” (1977)
This movie made a ton of dough at the time, and from a 2012 perspective, that is something of a minor miracle. Its special effects sequences and scenes of high tension are still very much effective, and all of the performances, especially Richard Dreyfuss with his family, really crackle. But when you think about it, this movie is really rather odd.

First of all, if “CE3K” were made today, there’s be all sorts of annoying people on the Internet calling it “CE3K.” Secondly, audiences would demand to know how the aliens were imprinting the Devil’s Tower location on the witnesses. They’d also need to know why they were picked and so on.

What’s so interesting about this movie is that you can read it as a total descent into true schizophrenia and how it destroys a family. In the real world, we’d be begging Teri Garr to get her husband committed.

Radical interpretations aside, the scene where the toys all go bananas on the farm is still scary as crap, and the “interstellar language” musical sequence is chilling. Francois Truffaut is in it for no real reason other than as an excuse to have Bob Balaban be our eyes. And Balaban shouting, “They were invited!” over the din of helicopters is probably one of the Spielbergian moments of all.

2. “Jaws” (1975)
We’re gonna need a bigger list.

After countless viewings on VHS, Blu-ray, Superstation and in a packed house one summer night at New York’s Ziegfeld Theater, “Jaws” just keeps getting better.

Is it the tension? The archetypal characters? The zingers? The camerawork? The music? The answer is yes to all. “Jaws” fits snugly in that uncanny crevice of lending itself to intellectual scrutiny (Don’t you see? It’s one big Freudian analogy!) as well as popcorn-munching fun (Holy crud! The fish is so big!). Few movies so dependent on thrills from as far back as 1975 still totally work for a young, ADHD-addled audience. When they made this, there was something in the water.

“Jaws” is basically tied for first place. But there can be only one!

1. “Raiders of the Lost Ark” (1981)
“Raiders of the Lost Ark” is the best Spielberg movie because it is also one of the best movies of all time. It is iconic, exhilarating, hilarious, wonderfully shot, scored and edited, and it is just a little bit smarter than it needs to be.

The love child of Spielberg and George Lucas, “Lost Ark” is the result of lives nurtured by the flicker of classic cinema, and yet somehow it is even more than the sum of its parts. “Raiders” is a pure rendition of good vs. evil, but in a genuine American fashion, wherein good is busting with swagger and the exceptionalism to back it up. It is, undeniably, a masterpiece.

Categories: Lists

Tags: 1941, A.I. Artificial Intelligence, Always, Amistad, Catch Me If You Can, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, Duel, E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, empire of the sun, Hook, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, jaws, Jurassic Park, Minority Report, munich, Raiders of the Lost Ark, Saving Private Ryan, schindler's list, The Adventures of Tintin, The Color Purple, The Lost Word: Jurassic Park, The Sugarland Express, The Terminal, War Horse, War of the Worlds, Steven Spielberg, George Lucas

Kamis, 16 Juni 2011

The Next 10 Steven Spielberg Homages

Once upon a time, Steven Spielberg was a young radical, the champion of the high-concept blockbuster, a director who didn’t shy away from extraterrestrial beings or magical circumstances, or treat them as B-movie trash. Alfred Hitchcock praised him as the first director who “didn’t see the proscenium arch,” and while it can be argued he was just one of many in the 1970s who didn’t, I’d argue he was the first to infuse aliens with the charm of Capra.

But in the circle of cinematic life, Spielberg is now old-school. The first generation who grew up with his films is now old enough to make films themselves. And they have. Many have cited him as an influence, but only J.J. Abrams was brazen enough to actually make a movie that directly pays homage to him. (Is it meta if the man you pay tribute to then produces your film? Would Sergio Leone have produced Quentin Tarantino? The mind really whirls.) Critics are already divided on Super 8 and its unabashed exploitation of nostalgia, but audiences seem destined to eat it up. The most common response to the trailer is (surprise) “Oh, that reminds me of an old Spielberg film!”, so it’s already nailing that pleasure center of our brains. And where one goes, others will follow. Here are the 10 Spielberg homages we expect to see over the course of the next decade.

Indiana Jones1.    ”Fortune and Glory”

Oh, I know what you’re saying — Indiana Jones has been “done” several times over.  Lara Croft, National Treasure, The DaVinci Code, Stephen Sommers’ The Mummy trilogy, and Uncharted are just a handful of movies (or games that will be movies) to have borrowed the dashing archeologist trope.

But no one has gotten to the heart of what made Indy: pulp serials. No one has yet made a movie about faux scholasticism, they just slap more of it on. Indiana Jones is ripe for proper homage. We need another hero who is straight out of 1930s serials, and a story that takes place in the glory days of Egyptology and colonialism. Or, we need to meet a scholar so steeped in pulp and Indiana Jones movies that he desperately seeks out magic artifacts, and inadvertently finds one.

Jurassic Park2.    ”The Pirates Don’t Eat the Tourists”

Unlike Indiana Jones, Jurassic Park hasn’t been subjected to a lot of rip-offs. (Unless you count SyFy movies. And I don’t.) Its influence has been purely technological instead of creative or spiritual. I suspect this is because of it’s timing. Those who soaked up Close Encounters of the Third Kind were undoubtedly dazzled by Jurassic Park, but their influence was “set.” The 1990s kids who grew up with that movie aren’t quite old and established enough to infuse it into their films.  Also, the film has been heavily sequelized, with every year bringing whispers of more installments or outright remakes. It’s hard to homage if something is still running.

Still, it’s bound to be coming.  I expect a homage to take on “Science for profit and menace” theme more fully, spinning entire stories out of “Nature finds a way.”  (One could argue The Rise of the Planet of the Apes is already playing with that a bit, but Apes always did.)  Or, some young filmmaker may watch it and wish so fervently that a theme park would come to life that he writes his own story rich with chaos. (Jon Favreau’s The Magic Kingdom may already be that movie.)  Or someone else will take up the “ancient animals given new life” thread, and spin a tail of nature bringing back the woolly mammoth, and the planet reverting to a primal state.  Pick your storyline, rebottle the magic of the hidden reveal (a dinosaur foot, a rumble, wide-eyed shock of the characters seeing what you can’t, the horror of it all going wrong), and you have a trip down memory lane.

3.    ”Gonna Need A Bigger Boat”

Jaws has influenced a ton of movies. (Especially if you count SyFy. Which I don’t.) But have any of them actually captured its stark, ominous nature? Its two-note villain? Not in my opinion. Isn’t there someone out there who is brave enough to make a monster movie — in the snow, on a mountain, in the sea — where you barely see the monster … but you hear it in the film’s music? Yes, there is. They’ll take Jim Shepard’s “Tedford and the Megalodon” and tweak it into a two-hour hunt, full of hints and ominous music signaling the rise of a nightmarish, white creature from the icy depths.

Empire of the Sun4.    ”I can’t remember what my parents look like.”

Spielberg’s Empire of the Sun is one of his most underrated films. (It’s also the moment people should have realized Christian Bale could act.) It’s Spielberg’s homage to David Lean, and given his unique twist by being portrayed through the eyes of a child. Looking back on it now, it seems utterly daring to have a kid ripped from his parents, and spend the film slowly descending into hollow-eyed savagery. Somewhere, a director is watching this and planning his own kid-in-the-wilderness epic that will make full use of the isolation, the horror, the loss of innocence, and that last, tear-jerking scene where he can’t recognize his own family. Perhaps it will be a post-apocalyptic tale. Maybe they’ll ground it in real history. Whatever its plot, expect many shots of a young ragged boy (or girl!) in an unforgiving landscape — and they’ll pretend the whole thing is a movie…

5.    ”Bangarang!”

Hook is generally counted among Spielberg’s biggest disasters, though it’s enjoying a second life among 20-somethings who adored Rufio. (I wasn’t one of them. Sorry!) What’s odd about Hook is that no one is paying overt homage to it, but everyone is currently ripping off its conceit and reworking fairy tales for the modern world. Tomorrow, you may even load up your favorite website and discover a director is writing his own fairy tale hero — or rather, the story of what happens to that hero when he forgets he’s a magic, immortal fairy tale, and goes to live in the real world. What happens when he returns? What does he or she find? Will they rediscover their magical, innocent essence? Yes. Because this is an homage to Hook.

6.    ”He came to me!!”

Having not seen Super 8, I can’t say whether it’s carrying a boatload of references to E.T. (Given the amount of carnage inherent in the trailer, I suspect it has the broken family, but none of the quiet friendship-across-a-galaxy.) But it’s my humble opinion that no one — and certainly not Mac and Me — has ever captured the sheer magic of finding and adopting an alien from another world. E.T. is so full of the loneliness of a geeky and messy childhood, and how we all pray for that one thing that will make us special. No director has ever tapped its quiet magic, favoring shrill jokes and hysterical situations over sitting quietly with your new friend, and enjoying some candy. Someone is aching to “remake” that story but with a new angle (maybe it could star a girl this time!). Perhaps the lead character is readily familiar with films that find alien friends, and has to constantly say, “This isn’t like E.T..”  But sweetly and with reverence.

7.    ”Come back, plane!”

If there’s a film that’s as widely disdained as Hook, it’s Spielberg’s 1941. But it has a real cult following, and I suspect it may even attract more of one in a post-Inglorious Basterds world. Someone out there is basking in its madcap glory, taking note of its use of real historic events and gleeful, destructive distortion. They’ve undoubtedly watched Basterds as well, and noted that Quentin Tarantino didn’t even suffer a vicious backlash for gunning down Hitler. A brave soul is, even now, sitting and churning out a world war mash-up (maybe they’ll set it at the Battle of the Somme to distinguish it) that shrugs off any recorded events in favor of joyful, gory abandon. When you least expect it, there will be a German officer wielding a dangerous torture device that’s actually a coat hanger.

The Terminal8.    ”I have to stay.”

The Terminal is a light and breezy affair, a film anyone could have made, but Steven Spielberg did. But there are a lot of fun and poignant moments in it that could sprout in the right creative mind. At the tail end of the decade, it’s not impossible to see someone lightly paying tribute to this quirky film of bungled tourism, and combining it with the magic and otherworldliness of Spielberg’s early work. Wouldn’t you love to see a movie about a human stranded for a year on Terminal Alpha Centari, a stranger in a strange land, frustrated with interplanetary bureaucracy and a  world plagued by fear after the Pegasian-B terrorist attack? All they want to do is go home. But what kind of home will they find, now that they’ve incurred time-debt by waiting around for their passport to be stamped?

9.    ”This means something. This is important.”

Once again, I have to stress that I haven’t seen Super 8, so I don’t know how much Close Encounters is infused into it. But come on, another director can be inspired by the same film, and come away with a wildly different story. Someone out there is wondering what happened to Roy Neary once he climbed on board that ship. They’ve wondered for years and years, pouring the answer into a screenplay. Or they’ve wondered about the family he left behind, and whether they were ever told anything about where he’d gone. What would it be like to be the son or daughter of a man who had a close encounter … and who chose aliens over you?  That’s ripe stuff for a 30-something filmmaker, and Spielberg homage central. They could even feature a mashed potato Devil’s Tower, or find the end of their own journey there.

10.    ”Is this your first stay in a rest home, Mr. Bloom?”

When Spielberg remakes something, any homage to it is going to become mind-boggling meta. But his version of Kick the Can in Twilight Zone: The Movie is fascinating — it’s kinder than George Clayton Johnson’s original (Mr. Conroy isn’t left behind), it has a bit more of a bruised spirit (the reborn kids realize there’s a darker side to childhood), and a quiet acceptance of maturity (they choose to go back, realizing the spirit is what must remain young). We’re currently in a cinematic era that upholds arrested development. A canny young brain out there (who appreciates being an adult) could take Kick the Can and spin a story about a person getting their wish to remain young forever … and the heartbreak that ensues when you chase after someone begging not to be left behind.