Tampilkan postingan dengan label Things. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Things. Tampilkan semua postingan

Selasa, 11 Februari 2014

‘Where the Wild Things Are’ and James Gandolfini’s Defining Film Performance

where the wild things are gandolfini

James Gandolfini’s passing, to be expected, has brought out a wave of mourning online, but the most surprising aspect of the responses has been the sheer breadth of work mentioned as personal favorites. As Scott Tobias so rightly noted on Twitter, seeing nearly all of his roles mentioned as among his finest is one of the best tributes that could be made to the actor’s talent.

Of all Gandolfini’s memorable, show-stealing performances, my own favorite is one in which that iconic, imposing but charismatic image of his does not even make an appearance. I am talking of his voice role in Spike Jonze’s adaptation of Maurice Sendak’s “Where the Wild Things Are”. I haven’t seen the film since shortly after its home video release, but Gandolfini’s Carol has never left me since 2009.

The central Wild Thing encountered by the runaway Max, Carol is the most blatant projection of the human boy’s fear and loathing, the clearest indication that these beasts are the monsters of the child’s id-driven imagination, as well as the product of his quest for a relatable father figure. Scooping up Max as a king, Carol provides that paternal quality for the boy to replace the dad he lacks. But because Carol is also a reflection of the child’s inner mind, he does not have the maturity to correspond with his size and sense of power.

Look at this beautiful scene where Carol talks about the fate of the desert and Max discusses the eventual death of the Sun:

Neither has the wisdom nor maturity to give answers to their unsettling worries: Carol knows that the desert that formed from rock will eventually turn to dust but does not know what that will mean, while Max’s observation of the Sun’s limited lifespan is rattled off as it no doubt entered his head: merely a factoid he absorbed while paying half-attention in class. But Gandolfini’s voice betrays a sense not only of curiosity but disquiet: knowing that this bleak expanse of land will only get worse is hard enough to process, but the news of the sun. The illusion of Carol’s safety breaks down, only to be instantly re-inflated by braggadocio as he assures Max (and, no less so, himself) that a tiny thing like the Sun could never concern them. In an instant, whatever stability Carol offers is replaced by the awareness of his false shade, all from the subtle inflections of Gandolfini’s voice.

Even better is the terrifying scene in which Carol realizes Max is not all he’s made out to be:

The intervallic gaps of Carol’s mood swings, as well as the focus of his inchoate feelings, rely fully on Gandolfini’s vocal pitches. The clip starts with Carol raging at Max for not living up to his promise, the monster’s confidence in his king totally eroded. When Carol’s best friend, Douglas, finally says aloud what everyone but Carol knew all along, that Max is no king, suddenly his friend turns on him. Having himself come close to calling Max a fraud, Carol cannot handle hearing that doubt confirmed aloud. The anger turns to an aghast whimper, the voice of a child who has flirted with a swear word but blanches when he hears it actually spoken. “Don’t say that. How could you say that? Don’t you dare say that,” Carol rapidly replies.

Gandolfini puts the emphasis in different places in each sentence, mapping out a frenzy of emotions in less than five seconds. The inability to pick a specific target for his feelings of anger, rage, resentment, confusion and hurt, bouncing viciously between the person who wounded him and the person who dared to point it out, completely reverses the father-son dynamic of Max and his imaginary friend: now it is Max, the progenitor of this vision of the id, who has become the neglectful, deceitful father and Carol who acts out the boy’s feelings toward his own dad. This is, naturally, a thematic shift established by Jonze’s direction and the script, but it is Gandolfini’s voice, with its slow erosion of wisdom and its sudden escalation of hostilities, that truly communicates the change.

Celebrity voice casting is, by and large, a useless and money-wasting gimmick. (Look up nearly any interview with Billy West to get some idea of how voice actors view such stunt-casting.) Often, big-name talent get paid more simply to talk in their normal voices than voice actors who can perform a half-dozen or more fully fleshed-out vocal parts, all for the dubious reward of slapping a familiar name on a poster. But Gandolfini gives an honest-to-God performance, one that covers a broad emotional spectrum but is always real and raw, capable of extracting considerable amounts of fear and heartbreak from the flesh he places on the costumed-and-computer-animated fuzzball that puts a body to his voice.

where_the_wild_things_are_james_gandolfini

Gandolfini will rightly be remembered for Tony Soprano, unquestionably the most influential TV character of the modern era. That role built upon the actor’s live self over an extended period of time, hiding the mobster’s uninhibited macho id under a calculating superego that knows how to get what it wants without sacrificing an image of collected calm. As a part, Carol is the opposite of Tony: a disembodied presence that aggressively pursues what it has not even identified as a true desire. It’s the most visible example of how much Gandolfini liked to push himself, which can be seen in the acidic confidence he brought to a politically minded general in “In the Loop”, the “Oh, what next?” exasperation of his scandalized mayor in “The Taking of Pelham 123” and so much more.

Gandolfini never wanted for acclaim, but his work in “Where the Wild Things Are” is not merely a great performance but a defining one in its field of voice acting. The ultimate melancholy of the role makes it a fitting role to get stuck in my head at the moment, though that also makes the prospect of revisiting Gandolfini’s exceptional work in it too painful a task for the time being. The wrenching farewell scene that ends Max’s time with the Wild Things is not available online (or at least, it is not available as anything other than a repurposed music video), but if Gandolfini could play Carol as his own parent and child, the keening howl he creates for the monster’s goodbye makes an appropriately self-reflexive send off for himself.

This piece was originally published on Not Just Movies. It has been revised by the original author for the purposes of this republication.

Categories: Features

Tags: Jake Cole, James gandolfini, Max Powers, Spike jonze, Where the wild things are

Senin, 20 Januari 2014

Fanboy Meets World: 5 Things to Love About ‘After Earth’

Fanboy Meets World is a bi-weekly column that runs on alternate Mondays.

Listen: it’s not like “After Earth” is a good movie. But those of us with a fondness for comics, pulp adventure stories, gizmos, gadgets, gewgaws, fantasy realms and Fiend Folios ought not to turn up our noses. So it was more of a “Medium Willie” Weekend box office-wise, but for Fanboys there’s a lot to love in this unfairly maligned Scientology fable, er, I mean, tale of Father and Son facing obstacles. As a nerd, it is my job to list them.

1.) Smart Fabric

jaden smith after earth smart fabric

Jaden Smith isn’t running around in the woods in a onesie for no reason. He’s wearing “Smart Fabric” – unitards of the future that change color depending on the situation. At rest, you’re rockin’ something of a “burnt umber” color (if I’m remembering my Bob Ross correctly) but when trouble comes, your outfit turns black. That’s how you know sharp-toothed, stone-throwing monkeys are near. When you are freezing to the point of hypothermia and/or have a bloodstream pumped full of toxins from a mutant leech your clothes turn off-white and light blue, kinda resembling Tron Guy. Whether or not the new color will, you know, warm you up while you are cold remains unknown.

2.) 3D Holograms Everywhere

after earth

Will Smith spends most of the film behind a bank of computer screens monitoring Jaden on his quest to find the text-sending doohickey that be their rescue. In comics terms, he’s the elderly Bruce Wayne to Jaden’s Terry McGinnis. (Or the 7-Zark-7 to the G-Force Team if you want to go a little more hardcore.) Readouts with nifty fonts hover around him, making graphs and calculating survival rates as Jaden encounters setbacks. Best, though, are the peripherals that are ubiquitous in the future of “After Earth.” A gray, floppy rubber square is like a portable 3D holo-projectin’ Kindle Fire, making examining spreadsheets look just as cool as travelling faster-than-light. Speaking of which . . .

3.) Traveling

after earth spaceship

Okay, there’s an awful lot about “After Earth”’s backstory that’s a little vague (and I haven’t had a chance to dig into the paperback of collected prequel stories, even if one is written by my beloved Peter David.) Even though the Earth of “After Earth” was somehow destroyed by the recklessness of man (cue the CNN footage of storms!) humanity figured out a way to exeunt the pale blue dot and relocate to “Nova Prime.” Now, maybe there were generation ships, but the implication is that Mankind cracked the code of achieving superluminal speeds. We see it for a moment when Will Smith’s ranger Cypher Raige (yes! that name!) gives the order to “travel” to avoid getting pummeled by asteroids after a spacequake.

“Traveling” looked to me like an extrapolation of an Alcubierre Drive, a manipulation of spacetime that creates something of a warp bubble or mini wormhole. In the film, “traveling” is kinda like hitting a panic button. Without careful calculations you may wind up anywhere – but there’s no time to lose! – and that’s why our heroes end up on Earth.

4.) Cutlasses

after earth cutlass

The Rangers of “After Earth” are going to need a badass weapon, and that weapon is called the Cutlass. Cypher Raige’s version is called the C-40 Cutlass and it has 24 different settings. It’s a silver cylinder that pops out blades of varying shapes and sizes from either side, as if to say “screw you, Darth Maul, let’s see how many shapes YOU can make!” It is unclear if the Cutlass reads your mind or just knows when you need to change from a double-edged bastard sword a the humongous collection of sharp radio antennae-lookin’ weapons, but if it also has a leather punch it is the best Swiss army knife in this or any other universe.

5.) Ursas

After-Earth-Ursa

The big meanies of “After Earth” are fear-sniffing, pincer shooting mammal-chompers that look like a cross between “Starship Troopers”’s arachnids and Peter Jackson’s version of Tolkien’s Shelob. They have a giant eye in the middle with some other little eyes around it and a little gray fur. They skitter and they pierce and they flay and they generally make a mess of things. But if you are brave (stupid?) enough not to be afraid of them they will just walk on by without paying you no never mind. It is to M. Night Shyamalan’s credit that, when the music swells as Jaden Smith just lays there to let a two-ton tarantula walk over him, you don’t crack up that much.

Fanboys, pass up that cool, refreshing glass of Haterade. “After Earth” may be dumb, but it’s our kind of dumb. I’ll be accepting your submissions for “After After Earth” fanfiction at once.

Categories: Columns

Tags: After Earth, Fanboy Meets World, Jaden smith, Jordan hoffman, M. night shyamalan, Planet Fanboy, Will smith

Sabtu, 15 Juni 2013

Five Things the Oscars Could Learn from the MTV Movie Awards

The Academy Awards are still the definitive awards show (ostensibly), but the general consensus seems to be that they’ve grown a little stale. Or a lot stale. The general consensus seems to be that they’ve grown some degree of stale. And even though the Oscars recently celebrated their 85th annual occurrence, they’re still having trouble figuring out what works and what doesn’t – what it is that people want to see when they sit down to watch a celebration of the year in film.

The MTV Movie Awards, the latest edition of which airs this Sunday night, have never had that problem. While they occupy a very different place in the movie world, the more casual nature of the program has ensured that it’s consistently fun and playful (and short), and the folks over at the Academy might should probably pay attention if they want to avoid a repeat of this year’s debacle.

So with that in mind, here are five lessons that the Academy Awards could take from the MTV Movie Awards:

Be Flexible

jennifer-lawrence-house-at-the-end-of-the-street-horror

If there’s one thing that’s been constant about the MTV Movie Awards, it’s that they have not been afraid to evolve. Not just in terms of the types of films they respond to (though it’s hard to imagine that “JFK” and “Bugsy” were among the nominees at the very first MTV Movie Awards in 1992) but also in their ability to shake up categories. “Best Scared As Sh*t Performance” sounds gratuitously silly, but it’s a solid way to show appreciation for the teen horror genre that has been so popular with MTV viewers in the last decade. I’m not saying that the Oscars should be adding new categories every year and trying to sound cooler, but perhaps a small degree of flexibility? I’ve been going hoarse for years yelling about how the Original Score and Original Song categories need to be opened up to reflect the reality of the filmmaking process in 2013, but thus far, tradition has won out.

Honor Your Elders

Anchorman_140Pyxurz

In MTV’s case, that means Will Ferrell, as horrifying as it might be to contemplate that. He’s getting their “Comedic Genius Video Vanguard Artist of the Millennium Award” this year. The presentation will be held during the show, televised in full, and may or may not feature Ferrell in character as Ron Burgundy. But there it will be, for the entire viewing audience to watch.

The Oscars have taken to handing out their Lifetime Achievement awards at a separate ceremony, weeks before, away from the hustle and bustle of the real show. This has caused a good bit of consternation among Oscar fans, seeing it as a sign of disrespect to their elders. And, look, watching a Paramount executive speak for five minutes after accepting the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award is probably nobody’s idea of a good time, but if Jodie Foster at the Golden Globes proved anything, it’s that Lifetime Achievement awards can end up being the most TV-friendly moments of all.

Look At All Parts of the Moviemaking Experience

Best-Shirtless-Performance

I will admit that I am probably the only person who is advocating that the Oscars actually be a longer awards show, but I could probably name a half-dozen more categories they could include, if they really wanted to honor everything worth honoring the moviemaking business. Best Stunt Coordination/Performances. Best Casting. Best Trailer. If you’re going to be THE movie awards show, do it up right.

The MTV Movie Awards don’t go that deep into the moviemaking well either, but they do give a pretty good scan of the moviemaking experience that their demographic enjoys. That means onscreen badasses, shirtless performances, “WTF moments,” what have you. Because the MTV audience wants memorable moments that everybody was talking about. Those moments that transcended the fragmented spheres of genres and media and made everybody pay attention to the same thing. They’re serving their audience. The Oscars should serve theirs. Which reminds me …

Stay In Your Lane

Ted-Mark-Wahlberg-e1362571673504

The temptation when discussing the lessons that the Oscars should take from the MTV Movie Awards is that they should get younger, cooler, less stuffy and musty. I’m here to tell you that that’s all wrong. There’s something positively Cool Dad about when the Oscars try to feel hip. It’s very much like watching an adult say the word “hip.” The second it comes out of your mouth, you’ve lost it. MTV goes aggressively for the youth market because that’s who’s watching. They’re not watching the Oscars. Not in numbers that advertisers like to see. Which is a problem because of demographics and disposable income and yada yada. I get it. Economics. But nothing good has ever come of the Oscars pretending to be something they’re not (case in point: Seth MacFarlane).

Young people watch the MTV Movie Awards. Movie People watch the Oscars. Young people who grow up to be Movie People will watch the Oscars. Provided the Oscars are still about movies. That’s where “stay in your lane” comes in. Play to the audience you have. Don’t flail about looking for an audience and lose yourselves in the process. MTV isn’t scrambling to honor Michael Haneke just to look smarter than they are. The Academy doesn’t need to pretend to like “Ted” just to seem cooler.

Recognize the Utter Brilliance of Salma Hayek’s Performance in “Savages.”

Just saying.

MTV Movie Awards 2013Categories: Awards

Tags: Jennifer Lawrence, Joe reid, Magic Mike, Mtv movie awards, Oscars, Will ferrell