Tampilkan postingan dengan label Twilight. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Twilight. Tampilkan semua postingan

Minggu, 18 November 2012

Dear ‘Twilight’: Thank You For Ending

The “Twilight” movie franchise has been so successful that even people who are not in its target audience of teenage girls and sexually frustrated middle-aged women have been consumed by it, overwhelmed by it, unable to escape seeing evidence of it at every turn. That includes those of us who work in the field of entertainment journalism (put sarcastic finger quotes around either or both of those words). Just as sports writers must pay attention to the WNBA occasionally and soccer every four years, entertainment writers must go where the stories are. And for the last five years, the stories have been in the “Twilight” zone.

But now we come to “Breaking Dawn — Part 2,” the fifth and final installment in a series that critics have hailed as “expensive” and “based on some books.” This is the last one. There will be no more “Twilight” movies (until the franchise is rebooted) (in eight years). It is the end of an era — not just for fans but for everyone who has seen its stars gazing blankly, Kardashian-like, from the cover of every magazine; for everyone who has been personally offended by the blasphemous notion of vampires that sparkle, as if the very idea exhumed Bram Stoker’s corpse and violated it; for every literate person who has condemned the popularity of Stephenie Meyer’s “awful” books, which they haven’t read; for every person in America who thinks that Robert Pattinson is odd-looking and who still only has a vague but unfavorable impression of what a “Taylor Lautner” even is.

It is the end of an era for us all. A bittersweet moment. As journalists, we say farewell to something we weren’t very interested in to begin with, yet we know in our hearts that we will miss Kristen Stewart’s facial expression (singular), and that we will fondly recall the pointless arguments between “Harry Potter” fans and “Twilight” fans. We movie bloggers will miss asking tough questions at red-carpet events, questions such as “Are Kristen and Rob back together?” and “Why won’t you comment on Kristen and Rob?” and “Will you take your shirt off?”

Most of all, we will miss the pageviews, the millions and millions of pageviews we got simply by mentioning something “Twilight”-related in the headline. So many glorious pageviews in exchange for so little effort! We will miss you a lot.

But overall, we are glad to see “Twilight” fade into the rearview mirror (which for some reason these vampires cast reflections in, don’t get us started). We’re tired of pretending that Taylor Lautner may one day be a legitimate movie star. We didn’t like being forced to admit that Robert Pattinson may have some talent. (For future reference, once we decide an actor is useless based on the movies he chooses to star in, please do not correct us.) We were briefly cheered when Kristen cheated on Rob, but the novelty quickly wore off. “Will this affect the box office for ‘Breaking Dawn — Part 2'?” was not a question we could ask with a straight face very many times.

Yes, we are relieved to have endured the last mumbly press junket, the last Comic-Con panel, and the last cacophonous outcry from Comic-Con stalwarts who don’t think “Twilight” belongs there. Never again will we be obligated to report with breathless astonishment that the latest “Twilight” movie has sold a lot of tickets!!!!!! and is popular among people who love “Twilight”!!!!! We’ve written the last of our “think pieces” about how “Twilight” reflects Stephenie Meyer’s Mormon faith, or how the popularity of the series is a statement on post-feminist America, or any of the other B.S. things we made up to fill space.

With “Twilight” out of the way, we can finally get back to important movie journalism, such as ranking the James Bond films and posting links to mashed-up trailers. No longer will controversial topics like Spider-Man’s new mask being the wrong thickness or Dan Aykroyd saying the word “ghostbusters” in his sleep be put on the back burner. Now, at last, we are done with “Twilight” and can turn our attention to something that really matters: blindly guessing who will direct the new “Star Wars” movie. Our future is bright, so bright it practically sparkles.

Categories: Features

Tags: kristen stewart, robert pattinson, The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn -- Part 2

Sabtu, 17 November 2012

‘Twilight’ Memories Or: How We Learned to Come Together and Love the Vampire

I remember the exact moment “Twilight” finally arrived on my radar. It was San Diego ComicCon 2008, and I’d just joined the line for Hall H. I can’t remember what panel I was queuing up for, but it was early, and the line seemed incredibly long for what was scheduled that day.

“What are all these people here for?” I asked, not really expecting an answer. But the lady in front of me turned around, and smiled with a mixture of smug knowledge, excitement and pity.

“Twilight, of course!” She stuck her hip out, and jerked her thumb towards her back. The back of her T-shirt was a riot of floating heads, all looking sorrowful, arranged around a title that baffled me: “Twilight.”

I still didn’t know what “Twilight” was. I wasn’t sure I wanted or needed to know. But it was too late. There was no ignoring “Twilight” after that. It’s as if the series jumped off that lady’s T-shirt and stuck to me. Suddenly, work demanded I had to write about “Twilight” – and write authoritatively about it – and I was studying my Cullens, Blacks and Volturi so I could not only induct newcomers to the cult, but pepper articles with references only a “Twilight” fan could appreciate. Every Comic-Con now found me found me yawning my way through “Twilight” press conferences (which had a nasty habit of being at 8 a.m.), too far away to see which werewolf or vampire was speaking so that my notes were filled with question marks.

I did what everyone else did: I snarked. Being thrust into the middle of an enthusiastic (and often hysterical) fandom that I didn’t really share irked me. Writing endlessly about it (and the news, photos, posters, rumors and rumblings never ceased) exhausted me. “Twilight” earned my disdain, and I enjoyed needling its fans whenever I could. Team Edward or Team Jacob? Please. Team Alcide Herveaux, thank you very much.

But before long, I realized picking on “Twilight” wasn’t fun anymore. Everyone was doing it, and it wasn’t productive. We did it to upset fans, they reacted predictably, we laughed and did it again. It didn’t add anything to the pop culture discussion. It didn’t lessen their fandom, and they couldn’t convince us to share in it. “Twilight” was here to stay until it had played out, and it wasn’t going to do that for years.

I even began to empathize with them. I knew how it felt when a writer dismissed or derided something I cared about. It felt terrible. Everyone was a fan of something, and that something deserved to be written about with respect and accuracy. It didn’t deserve to be mocked. While I was never going to be a fan of “Twilight,” I understood that level of enthusiasm and dedication. When I walked into the Comic-Con panels, and listened to the crowd shriek and cheer over footage, even my grumpy heart was warmed. They, of all the grim con attendees, were actually having fun. They were in love with what they were seeing. What was wrong with that?

But the thing I found sweet about “Twilight” fans – the “in love” bit – became the focus of well-meaning critics who began to decry the series as damaging to women. Women would spend their lives pining for an Edward or a Jacob, and ignore the guys in front of them. Bella taught girls they were nothing without a boyfriend, and that a boyfriend who hurt them was desirable. Bella taught women to be passive, Bella was a void, Bella was the worst thing to happen to literature and cinema ever. Now, I’m not saying these opinions had no merit, but why wasn’t that passionate criticism directed at other portrayals of women in media? Why weren’t those voices championing the strong female characters that did appear in film? For every furious tirade against Bella Swan, there was a photo gallery (often on the same site) that leered over a scantily clad Megan Fox or Mila Kunis. That wasn’t damaging to young women, but a lovesick heroine was?

Did critics really think women were so weak as to take “Twilight” seriously? Were we suddenly incapable of rational thought when faced with supernatural melodrama? Did they not realize we’d been reading, watching and thoroughly enjoying romantic pulp for decades? What did they think was underneath the covers of Harlequin novels? Recipes? Beauty advice? Poetry? Nope, and many a sturdy feminist has read one of them, enjoyed the moment when a Highlander or cowboy ripped off a bodice, and survived with her backbone, intellect and morals intact. To insist women and girls shouldn’t see or read “Twilight” for their own good was an ugly echo of those medieval relics who argued we shouldn’t even be taught to read or write because we’d ruin our moral fiber with love letters. Women, it seems, still can’t be trusted with the written word, and I didn’t like that insinuation.

I did what I never expected: I became protective and defensive of “Twilight” fans. I knew the phenomenon would pass, and young women would tire of Bella’s lovesick monologues, and seek out a heroine who offered more in the way of action and independence. I’ve seen that come true as girls swap Bella for Katniss Everdeen. It’s a cycle. People, young and old, need different fantasies for different moments in their lives.

Never fear. “Twilight” is over. The world survived. Women survived. I survived, and I won’t miss writing breathy love letters to Robert Pattinson or Taylor Lautner. (Sorry guys – I thought of Joe Manganiello the entire time.) I won’t miss the furious emails from Twi-Hards, screaming for my head because Edward’s “human birth” and “vampire birth” dates were swapped in an article. I won’t miss getting up at 6:30 in the morning to make that early Twi-junket, and I won’t miss standing in scorching lines to try and get into Comic-Con’s Hall H to witness the newest piece of Twi-footage. I won’t miss the headlines about whether Pattinson and Kristen Stewart did, didn’t or are doing it. I won’t miss the memes, spoofs and sarcasm that litters Facebook after every movie. I won’t miss the rants from critics and columnist lamenting what Stephanie Meyer has done to vampires, literature or feminism. It was all ridiculous and exhausting. I’m glad it’s all over. I’m thrilled this is the last thing I’ll ever write about “Twilight.”

But it’s been an interesting phenomenon to be caught up in. I never expected to actually grow as a person because of reporting on “Twilight,” but I did. I became more tolerant, and developed new outlooks on fandom and feminism. I remembered the embarrassing things I was into as a teenager, and when and how I snapped out of them. I even became more comfortable with indulging my own tastes in lurid romance, confident it didn’t make me less of a thinker. Who would think one franchise about mopey teens could do so much? Not I.

So, “Twilight,” we’re cool. We are. But we’re done, and I’m so happy. Good luck to you and yours. But try not to inspire any more S&M trilogies, ok? I don’t think I can take another round of this.

Supercut: Robert Pattinson Stares Intensely

Categories: Features

Tags: the twilight saga, The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn -- Part 2, The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2

Minggu, 11 November 2012

‘The Hobbit’ Tops ‘Twilight’ and ‘Skyfall in Online Ticket Sales

James Bond and Bella Swan just got beat up by a bunch of dwarves.

Online tickets are now available for “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey” (in no less than five different screening formats) and so far it looks like pretty much everyone on the planet is getting ready for a return trip to Middle-earth.

Tickets went on sale on Wednesday this week and Bilbo and friends are already shattering records. The film accounted for 33% of the day’s sales on Fandango, knocking “Breaking Dawn – Part 2? off the top spot, which had been at No. 1 since Oct. 1.

“The Hobbit” also beat advance ticket sales for “Skyfall,” which accounted for 31% of the day’s take on Fandango.

There’s no doubt that “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey” is going to be a box office hit. What remains to be seen is if the film has as much repeat business as its predecessors — without the “We need to do this or the world will die” stakes of the “Lord of the Rings” trilogy, “The Hobbit” could come across as unwarranted (and unearned) sound and fury … especially spread out over three installments. Let’s face it — Peter Jackson’s not the most subtle director on the block.

All will be revealed as we make our way to Lonely Mountain. “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey” opens Dec. 14.

Categories: News

Tags: Featured, The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey