Tampilkan postingan dengan label Summer. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Summer. Tampilkan semua postingan

Senin, 24 Maret 2014

SPF One-Sheet: American Summer Movie Posters vs. Their European Counterparts

The Art House

Summer has always felt like a bit of a fever-dream: a series of months bound by haze and heat that, by the end, paint a picture somewhat estranged from reality. Unsurprising, really, when you take a step back and look at the burden placed on a single season’s shoulders. We spend the majority of our year mulling forward, clinging to a few months that offer an elusive promise of getting away from it all. It’s not always possible, of course, and there are some years that are better than others, but even they have a way of making themselves somewhat memorable (if only through heatstroke). They’re allowed to occupy a place that stands in sharp contrast to the other eight or nine months out of the year, harboring on an ideal that’s often out of reach during the fall or winter when life feels tethered to a more narrow path.

That’s how I’ve always seen it and, call me crazy, it’s also how I’ve felt whenever I’ve dipped my toes into the oasis that is Eastern European poster art. There’s a similar sense of abandon mixed with a dreamlike sense of storytelling within it that couldn’t be further from the more rigid structures in much of the advertising from mid to late 20th century America. The imagery often exuded a personal, specific vision that played on a more lyrical level rather than literal, undercutting some of the more odious aspects of communist rule. Posters from the Eastern Bloc bordered on traditional art, imbued with an unmistakable energy, while their American counterparts (not without its charms) often housed itself in tried and tested methods of mass communication.

But energy isn’t necessarily always enough, and often times commonplace structures yield equally compelling work that speak more clearly to an audience than those thriving solely on one’s passionately personal interpretation. A poster is a film’s ambassador and has a responsibility to the audience it’s attempting to draw in: speaking honestly to a story and it’s themes shows a respect for the filmgoer to make a relatively informed decision for themselves about what they want to see. Tossing all that out in favor of something engaging yet tonally inappropriate places the viewer at a disadvantage, and you’re left with work that borders on art for art’s sake in arena aimed at having a conversation with those you most want to tell your story to. Regardless, there’s something captivating about those things that feel inseparable from a haze of abandon, existing to give hope to the creatively forlorn.

The way in which films were marketed both here and beyond the “iron curtain” gives a sense of that tension, with studio releases during the summer months in America allowing for a clearer picture to be displayed by two differing schools of thought. What better time of the year to see the full might of the US advertising engine pitted against techniques from overseas than in the sweltering months adorned by Hollywood studios?  But while the heat is great, it’s best to remember that there’s beauty in the crisp, autumn weather – even if the sky appears a bit dull.

“Innerspace” (left: US, John Alvin/Intralink, right: Poland, Andrzej Pagowski)

“Die Hard” (left: US, right: Poland, Maciej Kalkus)

“Ghostbusters” (left: US, right: Czechoslovakia, Petr Poš)

“Big” (left: US, right: Czechoslovakia)

“Jaws” (left: US, Roger Kastel, right: Czechoslovakia, Zdenek Ziegler)

“Alien” (left: US, Philip Gips, right: Czechoslovakia, Zdenek Ziegler)

“Escape from the Planet of the Apes” (left: US, right: Poland, Andrzej Mleczko)

“Airplane!” (left: US, right: Poland, Witold Dybowski)

“The Omen” (left: US, Tom Jung/Murray Smith, Poland: Jan Mlodozeniec)

“Rocky II” (left: US, right: Poland, Edward Lutczyn)

“Rosemary’s Baby” (left: US, Philip Gips, right: Poland, Wieslaw Walkuski)

“The Empire Strikes Back” (left: US, Roger Kastel, right: Poland, Jakub Erol)

“Zelig” (left: US, right: Poland, Wiktor Sadowski)

“Raiders of the Lost Ark” (left: US, Richard Amsel, right: Poland, Twardowska)

“Young Guns” (left: US, right: Poland, Jan Mlodozeniec)

“New York, New York” (left: US, right: Poland, Jan Mlodozeniec)

“Labyrinth” (left: US, right: Poland, Wieslaw Walkuski)

“Betrayed” (left: US, right: Poland, Wieslaw Walkuski)

“The Swarm” (left: US, right: Poland, Andrzej Pagowski)

“The Day of the Locust” (left: US, David Edward Byrd, right: Poland, Rene Mulas)

Categories: Columns

Tags: Brandon schaefer, Die hard, Ghostbusters, Jaws, Movie posters, One-Sheets, Polish Movie Posters, Rocky II, The Art House

Rabu, 19 Maret 2014

This Is the Trend: This Summer, Fame Is the Ultimate Movie Monster

this is the end

In “The Bling Ring,” Paris Hilton cameos but other glossy-mag staples appear without actually being in the room, ghosts in the media machine existing only in a particular set of minimally-differing iterations. In “This Is The End,” not even the celebrities can see themselves outside of how their comic personas have been defined; the movie can’t exist outside of the joke of seeing how those on-screen differ from or conform to how we already think about them. The shock (or at least novelty) of both films is how closely they train their primary focus on the idea of abstract celebrity, considering Los Angeles as a celebrity fishbowl from two oppositely gendered perspectives.

The idea of being famous for being famous isn’t entirely new: the surprisingly credible Wikipedia page on the topic plausibly names Zsa Zsa Gabor as the first non-socialite to be written about far more than her tangible level of achievement would suggest. Nonetheless, it’s clear celebrity culture as an industry with its own internal economy has developed exponentially in the last fifteen years (in 2011, “The New York Times” estimated the annual value of celeb gossip publications at $3 billion). “People” magazine’s first issue in 1974 had Mia Farrow on the cover and made room for an Alexander Solzhenitsyn excerpt, a feature on the wives of soldiers who’d gone MIA in Vietnam and some socialite profile softballs (“Gloria Vanderbilt: A fourth marriage that really works”). The magazine’s early innovations included a penchant for highlighting ordinary Americans who’d undergone some kind of horrific sickness or performed an unusual act of heroism.

In the early aughts, the magazine retooled itself to be much more aggressively/manically fixated on celebrity coverage (something its editors were so defensive about they went so far as to claim in 2006 that “the mix of celebrity and human interest stories has remained steady at about 53% to 47%, respectively, over the past five years”). This retooling came about in response to the emergence of competition from “In Touch Magazine” (founded in 2002), the decision in 2000 to change the focus of the previously industry-minded “Us Weekly” to a celebrity-fixated publication and other new competitors.

So it makes sense that the relatively scanty movies that take the idea of celebrity seriously are mostly confined to the last decade. This isn’t to be confused with movies in which the fame of their players is a strong subtext (like “Vanilla Sky,” in which the scenario is that Tom Cruise literally doesn’t live in the real world) or any old biopic, since those generally function as half-baked psychologically-minded biographies attempting to “explain” how someone’s past led to their cultural/social achievements, not tracts on fame itself. (This will be the only sentence in this article to acknowledge the existence of the 2004 movie “Paparazzi,” which attempted to get ordinary Americans really and truly outraged about pesky celebrity photographers; it didn’t take.) I’d be remiss (I suppose) if I didn’t also mention Woody Allen’s “Celebrity” or Gus Van Sant’s “To Die For,” though these mostly seem like warnings before the storm. Matteo Garrone’s “Reality” (released here earlier this year) is worth noting, because it’s about a guy who believes appearing on Italy’s “Big Brother” will validate his life, although a) “Big Brother” is a much bigger phenomenon abroad than here b) “Reality” mostly treats celebrity as a metaphor for/correlative with religion.

the bling ring

That leaves us with two movies that came out three weeks ago.

“This Is The End“‘s jokes depend on viewers being able to mediate between the person on-screen and what their understood personality is; otherwise, there’s simply no humor in meek Michael Cera as a cocaine-snorting monster of self-absorption or watching Danny McBride take his bumptiously obnoxious self-confidence to its logical conclusion. Watching famous people pretend to non-celebrity status onscreen is always mildly disorienting, requiring collusion and a mutual agreement to ignore the obvious; puncturing this hard-won illusion seems to make people nervous. Trying to find financing for “This Is The End” was tough because of the premise of Seth Rogen, James Franco et al. enacting distorted versions of themselves. “Everyone asked: ‘This apocalypse thing is great but do they have to play themselves?’” co-writer/-director Evan Goldberg recently explained. “Yes, they do, that’s the whole point!”

“The Bling Ring” is a movie in which the famous are visually inescapable without being physically present (read our full review here). Sofia Coppola’s totally committed to trying to visually represent the mental intake of a teenager whose primary media consumption is of images of celebrities. Large swaths of the film are scrolling screenshots of gossip blogs; at one point, all we have to look at is a video loop of Lindsay Lohan stalking into court in a white dress. (“While Lindsay Lohan used to be an actress, her main stage these days is the paparazzi-filled walk into the courthouse, where she struts her stuff in designer duds like it’s a catwalk,” the “New York Daily News” snorted earlier this year.) The movie’s teens believe that accessorizing like the stars can place them tangibly closer to fame. “I wanna have my own lifestyle,” says lead protagonist Marc (Israel Broussard), meaning that the goal isn’t to act/sing/perform/etc. in any capacity so that you can then enjoy the good things in life, but simply to exist as someone whose every appearance in the public sphere is compulsively hypnotic. The guys in “This Is The End” monetarily worry about whether they’re so insulated that they can’t even understand the apocalypse happening outside; the girls+guy of “The Bling Ring” aspire to that condition.

What’s funny about “This Is The End” is that it treats Rogen as the biggest celebrity around while four years ago he played the embarrassed/disposable assistant to Adam Sandler in “Funny People.” In that film, Judd Apatow (sort of) considered what celebrity does to a person by having Sandler’s comic confront his inability to come up with new material due to having been disconnected from reality so long. He needs Rogen’s struggling comic for inspiration (the cancer subplot is a red herring in a lot of ways), and “This Is The End” takes that idea to its logical conclusion by having Rogen as someone now so famous the only jokes that can emerge concern his direct existence. This is the end, indeed.

Categories: Features

Tags: Fame, Op-ed, Paris hilton, The Bling Ring, This is the End, Vadim Rizov

Sabtu, 30 Juli 2011

Wet Hot American Summer: 10 Years Later

“Hey, let’s all promise that in 10 years from today, we’ll meet again, and we’ll see what kind of people we’ve blossomed into.”

The absurdist comedy troupe known as The State earned a fair cult following with their ’90s MTV show of the same name, but not enough to get Wet Hot American Summer — directed by David Wain and starring many of the troupe’s members — more than a modest theatrical release and a middling critical reception in late July of 2001.

Thankfully, it seems that time has only been kinder to one of my favorite comedies from the past decade (no, maybe not one of the very best, but high among my personal faves). It’s an affectionate send-up of ’80s summer camp romps like Meatballs, not to mention the era’s regrettable fashion trends. The skewering of underdog sports clichés, horny teen staples, and Vietnam-trauma melodrama is long overdue and perfectly irreverent in execution.

Wain juggles an exceptionally game ensemble that includes Paul Rudd, Elizabeth Banks, Janeane Garofalo, David Hyde Pierce, Michael Ian Black, Michael Showalter, Christopher Meloni, Amy Poehler, and a then-unknown Bradley Cooper, and together, every last character thread is escalated to maximum effect.

Nice guy Coop (Showalter) is this close to getting the girl and instantly takes that too far, hearing wedding bells when she’s just looking for a fling. When teacher Gail (Molly Shannon) vents to her class about her own marital woes, one young boy in particular sagely consoles her … to the point where they announce their own January-May romance come the end of camp. And when camp manager Beth (Garofalo) falls for astrophysicist neighbor Henry (Pierce), they top everyone with an immaculate conception, just because.

When the counselors go on a day trip into town, they manage a crime spree and record amounts of substance abuse over the course of what we learn was a mere hour. Our narrator (played by Liam Norton, but voiced by Samm Levine) is lambasted for not having showered for all eight weeks of summer, but sadder/funnier still is the reveal that poor Arty’s been talking into an unplugged microphone the entire time. Ultimately, a falling piece of SkyLab threatens the fate of the campers (yes, really), and who saves the day but a socially awkward deus ex machina who just happened to have powers beyond belief.

It’s all so gleefully manic, alternately astute with regards to coming-of-age formula and utterly ridiculous. Rudd’s ultra-obnoxious routine is priceless, and if you can find a movie with a more quotable can of vegetables, then keep it to yourself. Even now, Wain and friends have floated the idea out there of doing a prequel that would see the whole cast return, now older than ever in roles that would require them to be younger. If they do manage to make it, I hope it doesn’t take an additional 10 years to get the gang back together, and then another 10 on top of that just to find its rightful audience.

In the meantime, I’ll be back at my bunk, fondling my sweaters.


Tags: american summer, amy poehler, blockbuster, bradley cooper, david wain, elizabeth banks, michael ian black, michael showalter, paul rudd, wet hot american summer

Minggu, 03 Juli 2011

FILM 500 DAYS OF SUMMER (2009)

FILM 500 DAYS OF SUMMER (2009)

Tanggal Rilis : 7 August 2009 (USA)
Jenis Film : Comedy | Drama | Romance
Diperankan Oleh : Zooey Deschanel, Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Geoffrey Arend

Ringkasan Cerita FILM 500 DAYS OF SUMMER (2009) :

Tom (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) adalah seorang pria yang memiliki kenyakinan bahwa setiap manusia terlahir berpasangan. Cepat atau lambat, dalam hidupnya pasti akan menemukan pasangan untuk menjalani kehidupan bersama. Di lain pihak, Summer (Zooey Deschanel), adalah wanita yang memiliki kenyakinan sebaliknya, yaitu tanpa keyakinan akan adanya cinta sejati. Summer sama sekali tidak percaya pada pria atau hubungan asmara. Namun nasib akhirnya mempertemukan mereka berdua yang memiliki beda keyakinan tersebut. Apakah yang selanjutnya akan terjadi ketika 2 kenyakinan tersebut bertemu?

[IMDb rating : 8.0/10]
[Awards : Nominated for 2 Golden Globes. Another 9 wins & 19 nominations]
[Production Co : Fox Searchlight Pictures, Watermark, Sneak Preview Entertainment]
[IMDb link : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1022603]


[Quality : BDRip]
[File Size : 700 MB]
[Format : Avi]


Download Single File

Download English Subtitle
Download Indonesian Subtitle

Bagi Pengunjung Baru klik di sini Cara Menggabungkan File Ekstensi .001 dan .002

Share


( klik " Like " Dan " +1 " jika kamu suka Film ini )

Kamis, 30 Juni 2011

Is the International Market Officially Dictating the Summer Blockbuster?

Once upon a time – not so long ago as it seems – the box office results ended with our American borders.   Oh sure, international dollars were counted, but they didn’t really matter.  They were icing on a delicious, successful, million dollar cinematic cake. A hit was measured purely by American dollars and the red, white, and blue butts in seats it equaled.

But that’s changed.  As of 2004, studios and producers were eying overseas gross, noting with some surprise that summer blockbusters did better internationally.  Often, the films flopped stateside, but succeeded beyond wildest projections overseas. At the very least, the international take helped staunch gaping wounds, and balance (and even cancel out) the film’s budget and marketing costs. Hollywood studios began wondering if they should tweak storylines to be more globally oriented, or perhaps devote more of the marketing budget abroad.

2011 would appear to be the summer that the experiment yielded major results. If you want to be really bold, you can follow in Forbes’ footsteps and declare 2011 to be the year America was “an afterthought” to studios, and the international profit was all that really mattered. It’s certainly the first summer that I can remember where every box office report featured “But [x] is a smash hit internationally” as the second paragraph’s topic sentence, instead of cramming in France’s cumulative gross as a casual closing factoid.

Cars 2

It’s also the first summer where studios admit their products were (and continue to be) shaped by international tastes.  “If we have storylines that at script-stage feel too U.S.-centric, especially with big action or science-fiction movies, we try to come up with solutions that will make the movie feel more global,”  Tomas Jegeus, co-president of Fox, told the AP.   Jerry Bruckheimer admitted that a star’s global appeal helped sway casting decisions in Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides, and Disney is quite open about Cars 2's storyline being shaped for a wider market. Cars, with its focus on small-town and retro Americana, didn’t connect with worldwide audiences. Japanese toilet jokes, Mater, and Michael Caine do. (We can always wonder why Larry the Cable Guy crosses all cultural divides, but the answer might undo all we know about the universe.)

Release dates are also being dictated by the global market. Thor opened overseas before it did in the U.S, earning $108 million worldwide before coming in to open American wallets, and neatly undoing the persistent belief that Marvel and DC heroes just didn’t translate well outside of America. Transformers 3: Dark of the Moon held its premiere in Moscow, which might be the glittery embodiment of Forbes’ claim that America no longer matters. Transformers is a franchise built on a toy. It may be the epitome of a corporate product.  And it had its premiere where the Bolsheviks marched, secure in the knowledge that Russia would generate more revenue than Americans, who are believed to be bored with blockbusters.

The new (not really) bankable behemoth raises some very interesting and perplexing questions about the state of cinema.  If Americans are supposed to be the consumers of loud, obnoxious, and thinly scripted movies, why are international audiences (usually believed to be the bastion of sophistication, intelligence, and taste) eating up what we reject?  Why did they like Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides, and we did not?  Isn’t its produced-for-a-paycheck mentality exactly what the world hates about America and its economic domination?  If the international audience flocks to movies because of the star power, why are we believed to be the most celebrity obsessed?  There are fascinating paradoxes at play here, and I don’t begin to understand them all.

And what does it mean for that ever weakening script if studios plot their films to an even wider demographic?  Cars 2 may be the harbinger of the future, a film stitched around cultural references, jokes, and the character who sold the most toys. Will future blockbusters feature token scenes in Japan, Brazil, and Thailand purely to scoop up buckets of money?  Undoubtedly. On the other hand, this may have positive effects for multiracial casting.  It’s been noted by numerous critics and columnists that Fast Five’s cast actually looked like the 21s century population.  A recognition that the world isn’t just made up of white people can only be a good thing, even if it’s purely mercenary.

It’s a bigger, hungrier world out there, and America is becoming smaller in the spending scheme of things.  It’s the worldwide butts that are going to keep the summer seasons going. We may find ourselves the last country to get any major movie release, which is definitely going to make us feel a little put out.  We may find ourselves in a world where Captain Britain (he exists!), Alpha Flight, Kamen Rider, Pikachu and Paddington are more profitable than anything tailored to American sensibilities.   Perhaps the originality (and the sheer desperation of being last in line to see anything)  of that – They’re … different than us! But the same! – will get us hungry to see movies again.

Senin, 13 Juni 2011

Review: All Hail Judy Moody, Queen of the Not Bummer Summer!

Judy Moody has gazed into the abyss, my friends, and she sees hope for her future and ours.

The fearless leader has a plan. We will no longer endure summers filled with boredom; rather, we will endure with a regimented points system, motivating us towards achieving fun. How does one accumulate Thrill Points? Moodists must set aside all doubts and subject themselves to the challenges of riding rollercoasters and walking tightropes and surfing waves and generally bucking against social complacency.

But more importantly, why does one accumulate Thrill Points? How else would the great Judy fend off the onset of sans-school doldrums? She is no longer the redheaded stepchild of unfulfilled expectations, armed to the teeth with trusty acronyms, glitter glue and newfound standards of accomplishment. Fun must be won, earned, dominated – it is only through competition that we Moodists may demonstrate our true worth to the fearless leader and her spastic cause, lest we forget her cries of freedom once her hand was no longer glued to a table in a ploy by the Establishment to prevent her from spreading the truth about the very real threat of summer bummerness.

Her struggle against societal norms has been captured well in the timeless cultural document fittingly titled Judy Moody and the NOT Bummer Summer. The animated asides, on-screen graphics and constant exaggeration of sounds are necessary to fully convey the hectic lifestyle of – and breathless progress made by – our fearless leader, and just as director John Schultz took his production design cues from the bravura likes of Bo Welch’s The Cat in the Hat, one would be wise to model their own domicile after the Moody home when not already modeling one’s behavior on Judy’s. (Even Schultz’ occasional use of Dutch angles accurately reflects the cock-eyed optimism that is her perpetual mindset.)

So find toads and let them pee upon your palms! Invite compatriots to spew blue puke in your face! Chase down Bigfoot! Hunt down Urkel! Sign up for Heather Graham’s “I Ate Something Gross” club! Plan your very own poop picnic! Allow antic aunts to get behind the wheel and drive down children in neighboring yards with little regard for human life! Defy convention, and disrespect your closest pals! Huff glitter glue and snort Pixy Stix! Don’t just be sick, be sick-awesome! And when all else fails, dance.

Lead your own thrilladelic life, my friends! Have your own super-cool, double-sweet goals! Dream the dream of Judy! Obey her every whim! It is only then that we may know the value of summer, and the purest definition of all-American glory.

Grade: F